By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Square-Enix using Nintendo to pay for Final Fantasy 13 etc?

The story of FFTA is so significantly less than Tactics', that only that is a major reason, I think the characters of Tactics are also much cooler. But if you talk about originality, then that's guite insignificant when a game or a product is really great. But of course you think FFT is not great.



''Hadouken!''

Around the Network
Ajax said:
The story of FFTA is so significantly less than Tactics', that only that is a major reason, I think the characters of Tactics are also much cooler. But if you talk about originality, then that's guite insignificant when a game or a product is really great. But of course you think FFT is not great.

I think FFT is good. Though not great. It's not that it's bad. It's just that compared to other games like Tactics Ogre or Final Fantasy Tactics Advance, it comes up lacking.

As for it's story not being good. FFTA's story was turned into a radio drama for Japan.

Which i don't believe ever happened for FFT. '

So... I'd guess most people don't agree with you.  I mean... could it really have such a bad story yet be turned into a radio drama?





Oh now you do think it's significant what the Japanese think, when I have heard you if I not making a mistake, talk more than once now, about how bad FFVII is, while the same Japanese people love it. So you only use their preference as an argument when it might help you? Not a bad tactic of course. But in this case, I don't think it works: how would you make a radio drama out of Tactics story? You can't make one out of Xenogears story, so out of your logic follows, that the Japanese like the story of FFTA more than Xenogears' story, cause Xenogears has no radio drama programme either..



''Hadouken!''

So that story having a radio show doesn't make it better than Tactics' story at all.



''Hadouken!''

Around the Network
Ajax said:
Oh now you do think it's significant what the Japanese think, when I have heard you if I not making a mistake, talk more than once now, about how bad FFVII is, while the same Japanese people love it. So you only use their preference as an argument when it might help you? Not a bad tactic of course. But in this case, I don't think it works: how would you make a radio drama out of Tactics story? You can't make one out of Xenogears story, so out of your logic follows, that the Japanese like the story of FFTA more than Xenogears' story, cause Xenogears has no radio drama programme either..

Actually the main point of it was... if it had a bad story it wouldn't have a radio drama.

Still the fact that your whole basis for thinking Final Fantasy Tactics is better relies soley on the story and that it was deficient in every other way says a lot.

How would you make a radio drama out of Tactics story? EAISLY. The whole thing pretty much follows through Ramza's footsteps. With a few cutscenes between other people. It'd be easy to do.

There isn't ANYTHING complicated in Final Fantasy Tactics at all.

As for Japan.  I'm using your critera you've used before to prove it to you.  That's simple.



Oyvoyvoyv said:
Bingoo said:
Oyvoyvoyv said:
Ajax said:
Kasz216 said:

The Final Fnatasy Tactics Advance games are better then the original Final Fantasy tactics.

lol, this must the most funny comment of the month.

 

 I agree. It is so funny when people do not agree.

Also, he's not alone. You use GR a lot, so I'll use it against you too.

Final Fantasy Tactics: 82.9%.

 Final Fantasy Tactics Advanced: 87.7%

 

Ajax said:
People bashed Squaresoft, for rereleasing games on the PSX. But now that they port games to the DS, it's all good and fun all of a sudden. In other words, 'now that these ports are coming to a console you like, it's good all of a sudden'.

 

Wait, WHO bashed Squareshoft? In the PSX era, there wasn't a lot of Internet forums you know. Your friends may have bashed Squaresoft, but that doesn't mean the VGChartz community should.

I call your bluff. Show me 1 single thread made in the PSX era that bashes Squaresoft.

 

Also, Di8, I know you read the whole thread, I was just making sure you understood what he meant (it took me quite some time to understand it).

 

 Ok first off you can compare reviews of a 10 year old game to a new game, completely DIFFERENT PEOPLE AND SITES REVIEWING IT.

also

Final fantasy tactics the lion war -88

Advance-87.7

look before you post.

 

Wow, interesting post.

First - you just compared games from different generations. Exactly what you complained about me doing.

Second - look before you post. What did Ajax say? "the original Final Fantasy tactics.". Correct. The Original, not the lion war. You did, for some obscure reason, try to turn this into a discussion about whether the ones on Sony or Nintendo platforms are better. I have no intention of getting into that.

Third - Okay, so we have no proof at all about whether FFT or FFT:A is better. How the heck could you then write "are you kidding me?" to another person's post, simply because he disagreed with you.

Even though you're on the Internet, being nice is allowed. You could act mean to others, but remember that you don't have to.

 

 

If you had played the lions war you would know it is the exact original, besides 2 bonus classes (one that has zero abilities and both are hard to get to), changed to better understand script and cutscenes, and like 2 bonus characters. Besides that the story, and everything else is the exact same. Heck the lions war even has the slow downs like the original, they didnt even fix that.

The gameboy advance is much closer to lions war then the original tactics. Also i was comparing both advances and the new one just came out.

I said are you kidding me because he displayed it as fact, i even said it in my post that its his opinion but it was stupid if he thought it was fact.

 



Owner of all consoles cept DS.....Currently in love with prototype!

I said FFTA's story is less than Tactics' story, and you replied that the story was turned in a radio show, and so you don't think many people agree with me. This means that those many people think the FFTA story is just as good or better than Tactics story, hence they don't agree with me you think. But you can not imo take that radio show to prove those people don't agree with me, cause you only know that so many people like the FFTA story, to conclude any thing more is 'unlogical'........ but you already saw this post coming I guess... anyway, it doesn't matter really, I like Tactics more and you T Advanced...



''Hadouken!''

Ajax said:
I said FFTA's story is less than Tactics' story, and you replied that the story was turned in a radio show, and so you don't think many people agree with me. This means that those many people think the FFTA story is just as good or better than Tactics story, hence they don't agree with me you think. But you can not imo take that radio show to prove those people don't agree with me, cause you only know that so many people like the FFTA story........ but you already saw this post coming I guess... anyway, it doesn't matter really, I like Tactics more and you T Advanced...

But story differences aside you do agree that Final Fantasy Tactics Advance is better in every other conceviable way correct?

Gameplay and such... and that you are placing the entire weight of your opinion on the simplified for the masses Ogre Battle story.



Ok dude.. I already know now what you think.. so after FFT, and FFVII, when are you gonna say Xenogears sucks or something like that? :D



''Hadouken!''