By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - Fable 2. I had no idea it was that involved.

bobobologna said:
endimion said:
doesn't mean it's peter's fault, my point is that everybody is saying he is not providing on what he promises. and I answer yes because we all know what he promises is often far beyond what the technology available has to offer. the real issue here is we have a guy with unlimited ideas and tech with limited possibilities... So peter's should shut up sometime, but the real problem in the outcome of his games is more often tech related than a bad development or a bad idea....

 

So if I promise that a game will have the best visuals ever and run at 1080p at 60fps, then when the game is released and it turns out it runs at 720p and 30fps, it's ok? Because the technology just wasn't there to accomplish my vision? Don't blame me for my lies, blame technology for not catching up to my lies.

You don't hype up features that are NOT in the game. Remember how trees were going to grow in Fable? Yea, I don't remember that in the game either. Peter Molyneux is notorious for hyping his games beyond belief. The good news for Fable 2 though, is that he's been pretty quiet on the hyping front, which bodes well (IMO) for the game. He's no longer promising all these outlandish features, but seems like he's just hyping what is already implemented in the game.

where are the lies, he said what he wanted to accomplished with fable from the beginning, people hyped it themself after.... any moron out there could have said it is impossible to do all that stuff on a game running on an XBox..... what i'm saying is what we get is far behind what he wants to do, it doesn't mean it's a bad game not the game expected

hell yeah I blame it on tech..... it's not the same fucking up a game because you have a bad idea or a bad dev team, and simply not being able to find a way to implement something because the tech is not ready.....

 

being on 720p is not excusable and even 30 fps with the tech we have available... not being able to have a growing natural environment on an XB 1 game is definitely excusable... without saying that it is an extra for a game and should not take back on its quality just eventually add up to it.... people were disappointed, because as usual they believe any messiah out there.... once again what i'm saying it's not molyneux not providing it's the tech that simply don't allow it... you can take it any way you want, the idea is there, dev are there the only thing missing is the tech so who is to blame... because it's not here peter should stop thinking for 10 years until it catches up maybe ????

 



Around the Network

When is the launch date of Fable 2? Will there be a Limited Collector's edition?



wiki it rock_on



And that's the only thing I need is *this*. I don't need this or this. Just this PS4... And this gaming PC. - The PS4 and the Gaming PC and that's all I need... And this Xbox 360. - The PS4, the Gaming PC, and the Xbox 360, and that's all I need... And these PS3's. - The PS4, and these PS3's, and the Gaming PC, and the Xbox 360... And this Nintendo DS. - The PS4, this Xbox 360, and the Gaming PC, and the PS3's, and that's all *I* need. And that's *all* I need too. I don't need one other thing, not one... I need this. - The Gaming PC and PS4, and Xbox 360, and thePS3's . Well what are you looking at? What do you think I'm some kind of a jerk or something! - And this. That's all I need.

Obligatory dick measuring Gaming Laptop Specs: Sager NP8270-GTX: 17.3" FULL HD (1920X1080) LED Matte LC, nVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M, Intel Core i7-4700MQ, 16GB (2x8GB) DDR3, 750GB SATA II 3GB/s 7,200 RPM Hard Drive

Peter Molyneux is a mad man. He over hypes like crazy. Read about the features for Fable 2, and then take away about 40% and you have the game.

Still, Black & White 1 and The Movies were wonderful games. The rest? Ehh...



Top 3 favorite games: Super Mario Galaxy, The Sims 2 (PC), The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker