X360 had Vampire Rain and Bullet Witch. The verdict is still out on Too Human it is a month from launch. Who knows how it will be accepted. One opinion does not speak for everyone.
X360 had Vampire Rain and Bullet Witch. The verdict is still out on Too Human it is a month from launch. Who knows how it will be accepted. One opinion does not speak for everyone.
I find this to be a little odd... Like people have said, there are games like Bullet Witch, Vampire Rain, Bomberman Act Zero, Hour of Victory, etc. that don't have near the finished look and feel that Too Human has. Unfortunately I think this game will get more critical reviews then if it had not gone through 10 years of development and had not been shown in 2006. It should be reviewed for what it is, not its history.
I only wish reviewers were more neutral coming into reviews and assessing things. Reviewers hand out 10's like candy to GTA, Halo, MGS, etc. From what I have seen so far, Too Human should be in the 8-8.5 range when it comes out. RPG fans should be on the high side and action fans on the low side.
Wow, fanboy hope that this game is an epic failure is astounding. The miserable reviews from Lair and Haze must really have cut deep to cause such hope of fail from a game that is coming from a fairly well-regarded developer -- just because it is on a competing machine.
can we please drop the two human threads now, they have had thier lair and haze.
time to move on
...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...
PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk
really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...
| NeoRatt said: I find this to be a little odd... Like people have said, there are games like Bullet Witch, Vampire Rain, Bomberman Act Zero, Hour of Victory, etc. that don't have near the finished look and feel that Too Human has. Unfortunately I think this game will get more critical reviews then if it had not gone through 10 years of development and had not been shown in 2006. It should be reviewed for what it is, not its history. I only wish reviewers were more neutral coming into reviews and assessing things. Reviewers hand out 10's like candy to GTA, Halo, MGS, etc. From what I have seen so far, Too Human should be in the 8-8.5 range when it comes out. RPG fans should be on the high side and action fans on the low side. |
The reviewers would be neutral. The game has serious issues that will prevent it from becoming the triple A game it could have been
While I won't make any serious predictions on this game, I will say that I really doubt that it is the "worst".
I would cite regulation, but I know you will simply ignore it.
I'm hoping the game is good. I really liked the concept. These growing reports are troublesome.
It's odd, though, that this sort of press didn't leak about Haze or Lair.
| steven787 said: While I won't make any serious predictions on this game, I will say that I really doubt that it is the "worst". |
Well I'd say the worst game I've played in the last 5 years was Zack and Wiki. It just depends on which games you play. That is odd, though, considering Eurogamer has to review bad games.
Any publicity is good for a game. i bet there are some people who have never heard of Too Human now have heard of it by seeing the threads on here. No publicity is the worst. Being unknown sucks.
*bleu-ocelot* said:
Highly unlikey.I did hope for this game to be great though. |
I meant that this would probably be the most polarizing game of the year! Not actual GOTY material...I'll be buying it, at least...
Playing: Borderlands(great co-op,HUGE amount of content),Too Human(better late than never lol),Saints Row 3(Penetrator ftw),Minecraft 360,Harry Potter Lego.
Patiently waiting for: Tomb Raider, Borderlands 2