I know thats how the game looks, but i'm not impressed, but the game itself sucked.  Being picked off by guys who are not even showing up on my radar, and killing me with two shots is not fun.  Not only that by they seem to be able to spot you lieing down in 4foot tall grass behind about 20 tress while you are not moving.  I'm also not impressed with Uncharted either, the camera does odd things and the guy does retarded stuff when you try to go from cover to cover.

Kyros said: If you excuse me I´m going to reinstall farcry... FarCry really had awesome graphics. (no wonder it was the predecessor of Crysis) but the gameplay sucked yah for that we should compare the multiplatfrom games because its the real battleground. No it isn't. Multiplatform games are the lowest common denominator of both platforms and normally the lead platform will look better.

Far Cry gameplay sucked? What you smoke? Far Cry gameplay is fantastic!!!!

The enemies only apear on the radar if you spot them with the binoculars, and getting down with two shots only happens if you are going in plain view... lol... and about the gameplay, well is more matter of taste...

have you played both uncharted and pdz? ive had both, pdz looks awful if you play it now, uncharted is a generation ahead of it, try it yourself.

and kameo looks good, but only in a colourful way, uncharted is superior to kameo and you know it, quit messing about.

Here are the slides from a lecture an Insomniac dev gave at MIT.

http://cag.csail.mit.edu/ps3/lectures/6.189-lecture16-games.pdf

It should give some of you at least a vague notion of what the cell is supposed to be is useful for gamming-wise and what it isn't (if you read between the lines a little). The vast majority of the pro PS3 comments and even more of the anti-PS3 comments have been so far off that they are "not even wrong". The article selnor posted from ign was so technically bad it gave me cancer. I guess the days of cgw --before they were bought out-- when you could actually get decent pop-sci information from a gamming magazine are well behind us.

The point is those games (on high settings) still look good and compare well to latest console games.  While the latest PC games (or PC versions of console games) leave console graphics in dust.  PC = cutting edge and at no point, even at launch, could any game on 360 or PS3 exceed the best graphics on the best PC games.

I'd say you console guys should never try and position console games as representing the graphics cutting edge as at no time ever has this been true.  I really like playing games on my PS3 and Wii but they sure don't look as good as games on my gaming rig.

Cherry picling at its best.

ok then people i think it is time to rap this up, check this out

Pretty big difference if you ask me, which you didnt, but I decided to chip in anyway.

The cars in GT 5 P look better than reality. Thats just my opinion. lol.