horrible horrible premise for a zelda game glad this is fake

And my point still stands, only 2 of those games were about saving Zelda. Escorting her out of the castle in the first 20 minutes of LttP doesn't suddenly make the 20 hours of game afterwards magically about saving her too.

@Soriku: SILENCE. Children should not dictate the future of Zelda.

I've been part of the series since the first game. I don't mind a futuristic take for even one game, and apparently Miyamoto wasn't opposed to it either.

So is this the first official rumour?

40 rumours and 2 years later we might actually get the first piece of information, at which point there will be millions of rumours and another 2 years before the game comes out.

wow this isn't even funny haha. Seriously people that think there joke threads are funny seriously should understand that the joke is on them.

But I guess, hypothetically speaking, a futurisitic zelda is possible in the series. I mean let's face it the game has no boundaries besides the triforce. Who's to say that the same triforce of courage isn't enfused into a teenage thousands of years in the future, considering it's an ongoing process. It's plausible with the series, but I doubt it'd ever happen becuase it's so awesome as a fantasy series.

I was talking about its always in the storyline that at some point you need to rescue her.. so it's not strange that people pretending like every game is about saving her..

And in the Link to the past she gets kidnapped again after you get the master sword.. so 15 hours afterwards are about saving her.. again.. and Hyrule ofcourse..

This falls into the don't fix what aint broke category. Changes to Zelda, could be good. Trying to fix something that isn't broke, definitely not good.

lol its a joke cuz its not a zelda game this ,this is just id say bad joke

i wouldn't mind the story so much if it actually was link....but Zelda being taken into the future might not be that bad