the solution for all the third parties devs that might lose is wiiware...here its dirt cheap to dev a game and you can be pretty loose with what you make...i mean we have seen what half a dozen until now unheard of studios produce some quality games?

True, maybe that is where we should look towards for quality now.

2 things will improve quality:

1. Since most of the big Nintendo exclusives are already out (Mario, Zelda, SSMB, Mario Kart etc.) 3rd party sales percentages will hopefully increase in the near future encouraging more 3rd party support, which should result in larger budgets and higher quality games.

2. Good games will take longer to develop, especially when you're trying to incorporate something as unique as the Wii remote. I expect we'll see a couple quality 3rd party titles late fall.

3rd party support is going to take a while no question. Firstly Nintendo's in-house developers had the most exposure to the various intracasies (sp?) of the Wii concept. I find many 3rd party developers absolutely struggling to get control concepts fluid. Also the haste to put a title out there I'm sure has dampened the quality of Wii games thus far.
Cost in software is an additional factor. Wii is obviously an economic platform an appeals to gamers who actually want to be able to afford games and stuff for their system and not just have it sit there and become a glorified DVD player, then get on the forums and bitch about how much they hate Nintendo fans. Ahem, at any rate, with an onslought of titles debuting for $20-$30 production costs will obviously be cut because they arent making as much per sale.
I think the greatest boost though in quality 3rd Party support will come from titles such as Guitar Hero World Tour. When a 3rd party can step in and demonstrate that the nay-sayers are wrong about the aledged limitations of the Wii and can make something fantastic on it a groundswell could be in the making. Also Nintendo is coming off of a big slump from the last generation. Many developers probably abandoned Nintendo after the Gamecube and now are probably considering throwing their hat back in the ring.

It doesn't matter.

1. Publishers are content to publish sub-peak games that are easy to port for both HD consoles & PC and rake in profits.

2. Publishers are content to see lower revenues but higher profits on Wii, knowing that they can release crappy-to-mediocre games.

For the rest of the generation we will see very few good core games for Wii from third parties (This is not a prediction, but by this I mean something like: +/-1 90% & +/-3 85% metacritic third party games per year for '09 and '10 for Wii). I stick by my theme though:

There are more good (75%) core games for any one console than almost all gamers will have time to play or can afford.

Good stats. I'll add that among those lower numbers for Wii, most of those are Nintendo games. We had a thread a few weeks back that showed that the Wii is getting a higher percentage of "shovelware" than the PS2 did, as well (I forget the exact percentage used to define shovelware, but obviously it was quite low).

Despite the Wii's success/install base and the PS3's struggles, the Wii has only 2 more third party million sellers than the PS3. The highest selling one has Mario in the title (Sonic at the Olympics), and another one was a million seller on PS2 (RE4). That's kind of telling if you ask me.

I think it is effin ridicules that we are getting shit games. I mean there are a ton of games that are only made for the ps360 and all we get is crap like dogz and crap like that. We have a control scheme that could make a great games. like a shooting games with the wii zapper. We can have sword fights and pretend we are using it as a weapon. The list goes on and on with different ways to use the Wiimote. All of the devs are just lazy asses and the surprising thing is all they do is make video games. So you mean to tell me that they can not make a game that goes on the ps360 to the Wii right. If they would at sales (any sale site like vgchartz) they will see Wiis are flying of the shelf. So if they make a decent games and utilize it with an already popular game they will make a million sales easy! Like Half life would sell like hotcakes if on the Wii. Look at deadly creature that is being made for the Wii. I can bet you over 1.5 million people will buy this game and it will show if you make a good game they will sell. That is why devs are complaining that we are bitching at they and they are like we know what you like dogz.

I say if they are going to exclude the Wii with good games and make shit, then they deserve to go bankrupt.

wii ware....and they shall make moneyies

Who doesn't expect a lot of casual crap to be announced for the Wii?  If Ubisoft announced 13 games for the Wii and all except two are budget crap and has 7 games for the 360/PS3 but they're all quality games does that mean the Wii has won with that company when it comes to third party support?  That is what blue-ocelot is talking about when he mentions the majority of third party support .  For those who claim that quality is subjective, I agree. but it's pretty obvious what we're talking about when it comes to quality and ridiculous to pretend that it's difficult to tell the difference.

Topic is still going, :)
We've kinda strayed from the negatives of developer financial trouble, oh well...