By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - does smg beat every last gen game in graphics?

brute on 07 June 2008
sc94597 said:
THey do look great, but don't compare to SMG. ALl of those screenshots show only one graphical areaa comparing, then everything else looks like crap. For example ninja gaiden black has a good polygon count, and lighitng, but the textures,and shaders are horrible. The same thing could be said for everything else. ANd most of those pictures are upscaled. 

 


those are pc pictures thats why they look upscaled



tag:"reviews only matter for the real hardcore gamer"

Around the Network
brute on 07 June 2008
Dno said:
Ill never aggree to what any of you are saying i think some games look better and thats my opinion...... and if by the last Screen shot you are telling me SMG lookd better then riddick i really dont care...... wii fanboys just admit that xbox can push wii graphics......... and it has..... 3-4 years ago

well ofcourse that is just your opinion,but you cant tell me that wii will never have better graphics then xbox



tag:"reviews only matter for the real hardcore gamer"

Dno on 07 June 2008
sc94597 said:
Dno said:
brute said:
Dno said:
http://www.pcreview.co.uk/images/articles/97/1.jpg
This is what riddick looked like in case you forgot

http://cache.kotaku.com/assets/resources/2008/02/ninja_gaiden_black.jpg
http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2005/137/928401_20050518_screen006.jpg

keep in mind that mario is 480p in all the screen shots and some of these xbox games might not be
ninja gaden black

halo 2 map
http://www.bungie.net/images/Games/Halo2/Screenshots/Halo2_TombstoneGallery.jpg

i mean i can go on but this games rival to the fullest mario if not beat it.

they look really great but i dont think they beat it,ridick drops in frame rate sometimes which hurts it


of course they look good.. just face it some games last gen looked just as good as you wii.....

THey do look great, but don't compare to SMG. ALl of those screenshots show only one graphical areaa comparing, then everything else looks like crap. For example ninja gaiden black has a good polygon count, and lighitng, but the textures,and shaders are horrible. The same thing could be said for everything else. ANd most of those pictures are upscaled. 

 


http://www.gamer.hr/recenzije/riddick/velike/cor_09.jpg

this alone to me looks better then SMG.... sorry



sc94597 on 07 June 2008
Dno said:
http://www.gamer.hr/recenzije/riddick/velike/cor_09.jpg
this one is from xbox... and i think its way more real looking then SMG

 Cool you show another pic of the PC version. Let's show some pics of the xbox version.

See More The Chronicles of Riddick: Escape from Butcher Bay Various at IGN.com

See More The Chronicles of Riddick: Escape from Butcher Bay Various at IGN.com



brute on 07 June 2008
Dno said:

http://www.gamer.hr/recenzije/riddick/velike/cor_09.jpg

this alone to me looks better then SMG.... sorry


the textures on that game dont look good



tag:"reviews only matter for the real hardcore gamer"

Around the Network
d21lewis on 07 June 2008

Fatal Frame is looking GOOD!

On topic, my girlfriend thinks Super Mario World looked better than Mario 64. "It's just a bunch of blocks", she said. Who's to say she was wrong. Does "technically superior" equal better? Nah. It's in the eye of the beholder.

Some people will be turned off by SMG's cartoony style. Some think Wind Waker's graphics were weak. Other's think Gears of War was bland and drab. Opinions differ. What I do know, is this: Mario Galaxy presented what it was trying to present PERFECTLY. No amount of horsepower would've made it look any better, in my opinion. There are 360 games (Mass Effect, for example) that blow SMG away. At the same time, they fail to accomplish what they're trying to achieve. Mario achieves. Mario triumphs.



TheRealMafoo on 07 June 2008

No, SMG has great style. The graphics side of it is rather poor. I would say the force unleashed on the PS2 will look a lot better then SMG, along with the many x-box and PS2 games listed above.

Also, I think there are a dozen Wii games that look better then SMG.



brute on 07 June 2008
sc94597 said:
Dno said:
http://www.gamer.hr/recenzije/riddick/velike/cor_09.jpg
this one is from xbox... and i think its way more real looking then SMG

 Cool you show another pic of the PC version. Let's show some pics of the xbox version.

See More The Chronicles of Riddick: Escape from Butcher Bay Various at IGN.com


wow that doesnt really look that good,i think it looks better then that though but not as good as SMG



tag:"reviews only matter for the real hardcore gamer"

brute on 07 June 2008
TheRealMafoo said:
No, SMG has great style. The graphics side of it is rather poor. I would say the force unleashed on the PS2 will look a lot better then SMG, along with the many x-box and PS2 games listed above.

Also, I think there are a dozen Wii games that look better then SMG.

graphics arent only about technical,artistic design matters alot



tag:"reviews only matter for the real hardcore gamer"

sc94597 on 07 June 2008
brute said:
Dno said:

http://www.gamer.hr/recenzije/riddick/velike/cor_09.jpg

this alone to me looks better then SMG.... sorry


the textures on that game dont look good


 He is full of bullshit. He is showing the pc versions of the games.