Taken from evolutionoftruth.com:
 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, . . . ( Prime numbers, for example) | So, while radio astronomy seeks for years to find a non-random signal from space that shows intelligence, genetics tries to decipher the most complex code known to man and we chalk it up to chance. | 
DNA |
And thus we come to the brilliant "scientific" (?) conclusion: |
A simple non-random code, if discovered with a radio telescope, will prove another intelligence. It's just a matter of time until we find it. | | A complex non-random code, already discovered with an electron microscope, must be due to chance. No need to look for intelligence here! |
Unfortunately, many scientists today use science to PROVE what they already want to believe (whatever their pet theory is), not to look for real answers.
And legend11, my point is that the word design, by definition implies intelligence- I even posted the definition.
I never said that Richard Lathe as trying to prove God, I wasn't even citing his theory. I don't see why that was even relevant. I was making the point that the vast number of factors that work together to create a hospitable environment for life are HIGHLY UNLIKELY to all happen at the same time by chance, and that it is HIGHLY UNLIKELY for life to form without intervention. I'm not saying anything PROVES the existance of intelligent design, just that it strongly suggests intelligent design. Nothing of this complexity that happened before anyone was around to record it can be definitively proven. We all offer no more than educated guesses. Because of that, it takes some level of faith no matter how you belive the world came about.
There are inherent errors in science because there are inherent errors in human logic. We will never have all the answers.