That's a pretty subjective list. Not in terms of the games being significant to the video game market, but to say that those were superior on the PS3.

Burnout Paradise was the only one generally regarded as superior based on what I've read.

GTAIV was a bit of a wash visually although it does run at a lower resolution than the 360 version.

DMC4 was a wash although the nitpickers seemed to think it looked better on the 360 by examining still shots, which is important since everyone likes to play their action platform games frame by frame, right?!

Assassin's Creed... I have no intention of finishing this on one platform, let alone two. PS3 version supposedly had more glitches, but I have yet to experience a single one personally.

CoD4, as far as I can tell are so similar as to be essentially the same. Neither one is better.

I bought 3/5 of those for the PS3.

Still waiting on the verdict for which version to buy for Grid although DiRT, using the same game engine, looked and played better on the PS3.

quite an arguement you got there... greenmedic00 is probably right. The point is this is hardly an issue anymore. If someone just has a PS3 and wanted Quake, they would get it. It's their first port to PS3. The 2nd time around is far easier and everone else is getting it right. IW did it the first time with CoD4.

Really?!?

Burnout Paradise City - minor advantage

Devil may Cry 4 - same!

COD 4 - same!

Assassins Creed - 360 is better.
Gamespot - Xbox 360 Versus PlayStation 3 Graphics Comparison: Round 3 - Assassins Creed
http://www.gamespot.com/features/6191251/p-1.html?sid=6191251&page=1
"The game looks beautiful on both systems, but we did notice that the Xbox 360 has sharper textures with better 3D-depth simulation readily noticeable in the flat cobblestone streets. Edges look great in both games, as do graphical effects such as shadows, smoke, and lighting. The extra time it takes to install the game on the PlayStation 3 doesn't seem to give the console any benefits over the Xbox 360 in initial or subsequent loads of the game."

GTA IV - 360 is better.
360 - native 720p, AAx2
PS3 - 640p, no AA

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=46242&page=26

Gamespot - Xbox 360 Versus PlayStation 3 Graphics Comparison: Round 3 - GTA IV
http://www.gamespot.com/features/6191251/p-3.html
"The PlayStation 3 has a nearly 10-minute-long installation sequence, which helps slightly in terms of in-game loads. However, saved games take equivalent periods of time to load on both machines. If we had to definitively pick a version, we'd go with the 360's rendition of the game for its crisper visuals"

Videogamer - GTA 4: Xbox 360 vs. PS3 - 360 Wins

http://www.videogamer.com/features/article/29-04-2008-389.html
"if you own both consoles and want to buy the best version, we'd have to recommend the Xbox 360 game. While both games are more or less functionally the same, the Xbox 360 game looks significantly sharper to our eyes and features more natural lighting"

Eurogamer - PS3 GTA IV almost certainly 630p
http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=134736
"The PlayStation 3 version of Grand Theft Auto IV almost certainly runs in 630p ... However, Eurogamer's Face-Off compiler and resident big-brain Rich Leadbetter says that while the PS3 version may be a touch blurrier, it's not necessarily inferior. Far from it, in fact ... the PS3's lower resolution serves to mask a lot of the nasty after effects"

ETQW is OpenGL, not DirectX. id Tech 4 is OpenGL.

I'd blame Z-Axis / Activision Underground for the bad port. Nerve did the X360 version. However, while the PS3 version is technically inferior, the X360 is inferior gameplay-wise. Nerve dumbed down some features from the original PC version. I think they are both bad ports (haven't tried though) but the game itself is awesome.

Sony had to try and be clever didnt they, with their cell processor....damn it!

all them games u listed were ports and games that were lead developed on 360. nothing to do with ps3 not being able to handle them

the console doesnt struggle at all, look at cod4 that was identicle to 360 version simply because they were both developed in tandem.

as far as i have seen ps3 can do grafix better than 360, on multiplatform games that were lead developed on 360 then ported to ps3 obviously the game is gonna take a hit.

its funny you mentioned unreal tournamnet 3 on 360, trying to make people belive 360 multiplatforms are better, thats not a port it was developed seperatly, although it has some added extras like split screen, it doesnt have an open mod support

The PS3 version has a higher score for lasting appeal for some reason.

Skeeuk: nice job.

i laugh at people comparing games that are identical.