| *bleu-ocelot* said: Aren't the reviews suppose to be 3 different ones.I only see one review,by one person. |
yes theres supposed to be 3 different reviews
| *bleu-ocelot* said: Aren't the reviews suppose to be 3 different ones.I only see one review,by one person. |
yes theres supposed to be 3 different reviews
WOW!!! B+!!!....no...wait....DUH!!!!
| SpartanFX said: the official reviewer from EGM said no review till the july issue. |
does the july issue release around june?
this fake review probably caused thousands of fanboy heart attacks, i wish if could see one lol
I am so sick of reviews now, if any game doesn't get 9.0+ it is considered bad, we put way too much importance on it now, it's really starting to piss me off.
First Scan says: (Paraphrased) they didn't provide score or full review because they didn't want to be forced to abide by the rules Konami had imposed on them.
I would cite regulation, but I know you will simply ignore it.
how many times do we have to go through this? The reviews are not until the issue AFTER the current one (GeOW2 cover). That article is pretty much a round table discussion about their hand-ons time with MGS4. B/c Konami didn't want any spoilers or important gameplay elements revealed yet, EGM played it safe and will fully review the game next month with tons of spoilers on it.
i hate EGM , they always prefer arcade PES over FIFA...
mgs 4 should have a A or A+ not b+,
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.



