I'll only say this one:

MICHAEL BAY IS THE WORST FILMMAKER IN HOLLYWOOD.

Not as bad as Uwe boll but...ok maybe very close.

He's like a bad magician that uses tons of explosions and lot of smoke to stun the audience because he can't make good magic tricks.

His editing is terrible. Don't give me that "nobody gets it" crap. ANYONE with any good taste for FILMS couldn't LOVE that shit.

He doesn't give a damn about characters except for how much he can explit them.

He gives corny patriotic messages to give a fake depth.

The only people that like Michael bay's movies are teenagers with their hormones too high or retarded people. Sorry but that's the true.

GOD PEOPLE! what's wrong with you?" there are lots of better filmmakers in the whole wide world, why you support him?!

@jalsonmi
of course i meant cameron circa aliens and the terminator movies. after that its all downhill. but i believe he has the vision still.
its really sad there arent that many good sci-fi directors around. most are 40 something man-childs who feel technology can compensate for a shit plot
spielberg even took classic material(war of the worlds) and mauled it
look at kubrick, made one sci-fi movie and hit the bulls-eye with it
im not looking to defend star wars, i cant
i know as movies they have numerous shortcomings,i just found them entertaining
and i personally feel the same applies for indiana jones movies too
enormously entertaining ,but a masterpiece, no friggin way
i might get a bit of hatin for it, but does anyone else here feel that blade runner is waaaay overrated?just something i feel

 Cool beans on the film school. Can't wait til you rock the world and show George Lucas how it's done. I'll probably be the king of Egypt around the same time.

Yeah it's fairly overrated. Alien, on the other hand, is not. Great, great film.

No, Raiders isn't a masterpiece, just a fantastic piece of filmmaking (I might say Jaws is a masterpiece though. Best film he ever made. But I'm not a huge Spielberg fan either, actually).

And I know you meant circa the good stuff with Cameron, I'd just hope he still has it in him is all. I guess we'll see what Avatar is like.

There are some good sci-fi directors out there, but yeah it's few and far between. I think Serenity is a damn fine movie and Joss Whedon a pretty good director, but I don't know if he'd be right for Metroid. In actuality, despite what I just said, Spielberg might be a good choice to direct it. I think he could do that tone.

I loved Ratatouille.  I think it was a really well made film.

EDIT: Yea it got a 95% on Rotten Tomatoes.  Definitely not considered a bad film by any means.

Source: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/ratatouille/

I wrote "can't follow", not "don't understand". There is a difference.

EDIT: As for the "get faster eyes", that was rude, but the fact is that a lot of people can follow his films.

And you thinking only the effects are worthwhile is just your opinion. It does not mean he fucks up the plots. It just mean you think so.

This is another thing I can't stand about bashing him. You people seem to forget your opinions are just opinions when it comes to his work, even when you admit other things are just your opinions. 

So as you can see, they are pretty evenly split

VideoGame movies from 2000-2010 = 49

SuperHero movies from 2000-2010 = 45

but wow anyway... I think we will see twice as much in the next 13 years... I'm not complaining, some if not most of these movies were pretty good

@jalsonmi
spielberg?
i really doubt it that he can pull it off,if his past few efforts are any indication
i still stick to james cameron, or maybe ridley scott, though he doesnt do sci-fi any more
or maybe martin scorsese. "You talkin to me ,Ridley? im the only one here."
michael bay, and john woo, for that matter ,are the people who definitely should not get the reins(top is uwe, as expected)
metroid really deserves good treatment,as the basic plot can spawn pretty good scripts,if the right people are on it

on the surface it sounds great.. and i think it could work for some games.. but i think a movie usually needs multiple characters.. and the whole idea of her being alone being the theme of most of the games would be hard to reproduce.. I think if they made a movie, it needs to be about how she becomes a bounty hunter.. and start right from the start, when she was born and ridley killing her parents.. then the movie has a purpose - revenge

Well Cast Away worked with just one person for most of the film. And there are a few older films focusing on just one character alone someplace.