Blue Dragon and LO? WTF?
And their suggestion is Eternal Sonata over Blue Dragon? DID THEY ACTUALLY PLAY BOTH GAMES AT LENGTH?
Jeez.
I think the issue with the list is that the idea of disappointment is merely relative to what some idiot thought a game would be.
Lair, Haze, Assassin's Creed (at the top of my head) were all immensely hyped games that were totally DOA in terms of what the promise was. What exactly did LO and BD promise? I can't really remember people saying they'd be some sort of re-invention of JRPGs, and no one said they'd be some sort of insanely ambitious projects either. LO was hailed as a FF-Killer, and by most accounts, the fans that have bought LO have compared it to a FFX sequel...Definitely not bad in my book.
Likewise, BD has some disappointments in it, but not relegated to actual content, but merely voice acting (Maro)...Hardly a knock against the game considering it's a cartoony JRPG.
Yes, I'm defending 360 games, but it's merely the idea that neither game was really hyped to all heaven (but definitely anticipated by the JRPG crowd). Eternal Sonata did NOT deliver as much as BD did. And why in God's name are they recommending Mass Effect for LO fans? That doesn't make a lick of sense, IMO.
My biggest letdown? Next Gen sports games...Madden and NCAA have seen no quantitative increase in features. Backbreaker is the TRUE next-gen evolution for Football...And it's taken 3-4 years!
Hmm. Other 360-focused letdowns: Two Worlds. Eternal Sonata (in a way. Story was the biggest fraud I've ever seen. Here I thought it'd involve Chopin's life in some sort of way, and it totally ruins the core idea behind why I bought the game)...Can't think of any others. I went into most games with very low expectations this generation, and either got blown away, or it met whatever standard I had.