True. IGN is the only place left. Other sites reps have been tarnished too much to accept a review from them. Gametrailers may have been an honest mistake, but it's re has been tarnished so we need to take it with a grain of salt.

When it comes to reviews, I tolerate Edge and agree with 90% of what Yahtzee has to say. Everything else is a waste of space IMO.

yeah game informer is definitely biased against the wii. 90% of the previews and reviews and articles are on hd games. and not having the two person kart isn't a big deal at all. the only reason it was good was because of the specials so you could balance out the specials any way you wanted. i always use dk for his defensive banana, and a koopa troopa for their offensive 3 shelled attack. (now taking out the specials i do think was a big mistake).

and yeah that little insult to ssbb in the sales chart section was just retarded.

i also liked how with the shovelware article they tried to make it seem like the wii has by far the worst software lineup when it should be clear to anyone that has a wii that isn't true at all. granted it has tons of shovelware which comes with the territory of blowing the other systems out of the water, and it has weak 3rd party support which comes from the developers not thinking the wii would be popular so they weren't working on any games until last year. but many wii games have gotten scores a bit lower than they should be cuz a lot of reviewers are biased because they care more about high-end graphics. (like mario kart! should've easily bee a 9 out of 10, although mario kart games are all for some reason rated way lower than they should be i guess reviewers don't like mario kart while everyone else does)

I have despised GI since December, I feel that nearly every Wii review is totally biased and/or they just don't know how to play Wii games.

They reviewed Medal of Honor Heros 2, gave it a 6.75 and critized it not being as great on multiplayer as "the big boys" WTF? They also claimed controls were crap and only gave the review about an eighth of a page in the magazine.

No More Heros they gave a 6 to, claiming "combat controls never get passed button mashing" and "Making boss fights needlessly long to try the player’s patience".

To add some perspective, other games (non nintendo platform) they gave higher than a 6 to: NBA: Ballers Chosen One 6.75; Bee Movie 6.5; The Spiderwick Chronicles 6.5; Lost: Via Dominus 6.75; Jackass: the Game 6.25.

I mean seriously, how does No More Heros score half a point less than fricking Bee Movie?

Bias confirmed.

 Can you linky the article?  I'd love to read it.  

GI was as good as dead to me after they gave Paper Mario TTYD a 6.5 because it was "teh kiddiez".

Could some people try to dig up some other retarded articles?

Apparently, Assasin's Creed is as good as SSBB.

@DJmeisterJ

Sorry, I have a policy of not proliferating my own site links without valid consent from the owner. I'm sure you can find it with a Google search.

To be frank, almost ALL of the major video game media outlets, online and print, are either biased against something or favor a leading financier.

There are very few journalistic integrity watch groups for the video game media industry and they've taken serious advantage of that; the media and publishers.

Couldn't find it.

Fun Fact: While googling for it, a VGChartz thread was a link.