By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - JAWA - The early N64 Wii Game!

macross on 17 May 2008

 

 

 

 

 

This ain't Wiiware!

Em... Wii Developer: Wii ain't better than PS2, GC, Xbox, PS1, N64....This is what we thought, It just better than Atari 2600 SNES with motion-sensing!

 

 

Wii is just 2 SNES duct-taped together! Ain't Wii?

 

 



Poor PS3 Sales Means Smaller Losses

"Actually, because the number of units sold was not as high as we hoped, the loss was better than our original expectation," Quotes from Sony’s CFO Nobuyuki Oneda.

Around the Network
SaviorX on 17 May 2008

What in the world?........



Leatherhat on July 6th, 2012 3pm. Vita sales:"3 mil for COD 2 mil for AC. Maybe more. "  thehusbo on July 6th, 2012 5pm. Vita sales:"5 mil for COD 2.2 mil for AC."

__XBrawlX__ on 17 May 2008

WTF



 

 

 

Guitar Hero 3/ Smash Hits
ssj12 on 17 May 2008

amazing looking game



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453
 
Cougarman on 17 May 2008

must buy for me, i like the lack of effort and eye bleeding graphics



Wii/Mario Kart Wii Code:2793-0686-5434
Around the Network
HappySqurriel on 17 May 2008

I had a professor in University and ran what was called the "Media Lab" (if I remember correctly) and he did work on videogames (among other things). There were two core rules he taught to everyone he could:

  1. Always have a demo. Someone always wants to see what you're working on and it is (much) better to have a stable build from a couple of days ago than to show off some buggy code that you're currently debugging.
  2. Always implement something in its simplest form, with as little investment in unnecessary elements, because it is much easier to change if you come accross a problem.

If I were "King of EA" I would probably have a handfull of teams that are made up of a handful of really creative people making fleshed out games that look like this in the hopes of finding something unique and fun. If you produce an adventure game that looks bad but people really enjoy playing it, it is probably worthwhile to spend the money to upgrade its visuals to a level to make the game a blockbuster; at the same time if the game is a dud you only lost 6 months of work of 10 develolpers (roughly $500,000) which is a fraction of the cost of making a full game that is a dud.



Grey Acumen on 17 May 2008
HappySqurriel said:

I had a professor in University and ran what was called the "Media Lab" (if I remember correctly) and he did work on videogames (among other things). There were two core rules he taught to everyone he could:

  1. Always have a demo. Someone always wants to see what you're working on and it is (much) better to have a stable build from a couple of days ago than to show off some buggy code that you're currently debugging.
  2. Always implement something in its simplest form, with as little investment in unnecessary elements, because it is much easier to change if you come accross a problem.

If I were "King of EA" I would probably have a handfull of teams that are made up of a handful of really creative people making fleshed out games that look like this in the hopes of finding something unique and fun. If you produce an adventure game that looks bad but people really enjoy playing it, it is probably worthwhile to spend the money to upgrade its visuals to a level to make the game a blockbuster; at the same time if the game is a dud you only lost 6 months of work of 10 develolpers (roughly $500,000) which is a fraction of the cost of making a full game that is a dud.

This needed to be quoted for truth

HappySqurriel said:

I had a professor in University and ran what was called the "Media Lab" (if I remember correctly) and he did work on videogames (among other things). There were two core rules he taught to everyone he could:

  1. Always have a demo. Someone always wants to see what you're working on and it is (much) better to have a stable build from a couple of days ago than to show off some buggy code that you're currently debugging.
  2. Always implement something in its simplest form, with as little investment in unnecessary elements, because it is much easier to change if you come accross a problem.

If I were "King of EA" I would probably have a handfull of teams that are made up of a handful of really creative people making fleshed out games that look like this in the hopes of finding something unique and fun. If you produce an adventure game that looks bad but people really enjoy playing it, it is probably worthwhile to spend the money to upgrade its visuals to a level to make the game a blockbuster; at the same time if the game is a dud you only lost 6 months of work of 10 develolpers (roughly $500,000) which is a fraction of the cost of making a full game that is a dud.

in fact, it deserved to be quoted again

 

 



Seppukuties is like LBP Lite, on crack. Play it already!

Currently wrapped up in: Half Life, Portal, and User Created Source Mods
Games I want: (Wii)Mario Kart, Okami, Bully, Conduit,  No More Heroes 2 (GC) Eternal Darkness, Killer7, (PS2) Ico, God of War1&2, Legacy of Kain: SR2&Defiance


My Prediction: Wii will be achieve 48% market share by the end of 2008, and will achieve 50% by the end of june of 09. Prediction Failed.

<- Click to see more of her

 

Untouch on 17 May 2008

looks great, the fact that I just about dug my eyes out with a spoon makes it sold.



Miyamotos Opinion on M$


sc94597 on 17 May 2008

Hey I wonder how long it took to make that game. 2hrs?



FJ-Warez on 17 May 2008

I read Java and I got really excited, now after looking at the pics I'm kinda confused... maybe I need some sleep...



By me:

Made with Blender + LuxRender
"Since you can´t understand ... there is no point to taking you seriously."