I think we have far too many gaming geezers on these forums. I am talking about those geezers who have a hard time remembering blemishes in the past, and fixate on only the most positive aspects. The hindsight when it comes to Rare is frustratingly myopic.
Rare was and still is a wonderful developer. Despite the common misconception based on the ratings they are still about as good a developer for the 360 as they were for the 64. Bullshit you say he has to be lying through his pointy teeth. Based on IGN reviews Rare averages 8.4 for 360 games, and averages 8.7 for 64 games. By all means go do the math yourselves.
How could this be you might ask. The reality is while you fixate on Goldeneye, Banjo, Conker, and other highly acclaimed titles. You have forgotten that Rare also passed some very poor games through that Nintendo seal of Quality. Games such as Mickey's Speedway, Killer Instinct, and even Jet Force Gemini.
Ironically Rare has become a more consistent developer under Microsoft. Not only do they have a high average on the 360, but they are far more consistent. Which basically means that BK3 will probably rate no less then a 8.5/10. Which happens to be a very good score. I would dare say given the teams performance in the past that the game will probably score around a 9.5/10.
Can we move past this I am skeptical of Rare nonsense. Otherwise your basically saying you are overly skeptical of all developers everywhere in the world. Even Nintendo isn't averaging as well as Rare this generation scoring 8.2 rounding up. Damned those games used to move peripherals. So unless your going with the caveat that Nintendo is a shitty developer down on its luck. Then you have to basically concede that Rare is a very good developer.











