By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Greed or sense?

NinjabreadMan said:

Surprisingly enough I own a Wii.

Most people have read only my original post, which i'll admit wasn't a very good statement of how it is.

Still, my main gripe is with no intention of reducing the price over time like the traditional model of console business. It's true that this can be done to stimulate sales when demand falls, and demand for Wii certainly hasn't fallen. Was the model for the Wii designed around a potential low sale scenario? It could be this, and thus would allow Nintendo to still make a sizeable profit despite low numbers, ala GC.

I'd be interested in knowing exactly how much Nintendo makes on each console sold, and whether or not the manufacturing costs have fallen very much since launch.

I'd admit that Nintendo have done something useful in the form of developing the first decent motion controller for main stream consoles, but i'm still not happy with the machine itself.

At the end of the day, it's fantastic for the business, but no so great for the consumers in my view - even if they are willing to pay inflated costs on eBay etc. Clearly there must be excess demand that Nintendo is not tapping into at the moment.

I'd like to see someone post something to do with the Economics that doesn't resemble the "if demand falls, price will fall" argument I see here. It's not totally explained by this.


Price drops aren't the kind of thing you talk about. You do them, or you don't. If you talk about them, sales immediately drop as potential buyers speculate about the forthcoming price drop. Now, you have to drop the price to move the production that was selling fine before you started blabbing about price.

So Nintendo will deny the probability of any price drop, right up until they drop the price. It will happen eventually, but likely not this year. It doesn't serve Nintendo's interests to sell a limited number of Wiis at a high price when they could make more money selling software to a larger userbase.



"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event."  — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.

Around the Network

A succesfulcompany is not a greedy one, someone earlier said that sega is a nice company and nintendo is evil, they are only basing this logic on the fact that one sold better due to better marketing.



No price cut because its not needed, production can take months to incraese, and it can take months before hand to gain an accurate prediction of wether production must be incraesed.



Manchester United 2008-09 Season - Trophies & Records

Barclays Premier League 2008-09: 1st // UEFA Champions League 2008-09: Finals (Yet To Play) // FIFA Club World Cup: Winners // UEFA Super Cup: Runners-up // FA Cup: Semi-Finals // League (Carling) Cup: Winners // FA (Charity) Community Shield: Winners
Records: First British Team To Win FIFA Club World Cup, New Record for No. Of Consecutive Clean Sheets In Premier League, New English & British League Records for Minutes Without Conceding, New Record For Going Undeafeated In Champions League (25 games ongoing), First British Team To Beat FC Porto In Portugal, First Club To Defeat Arsenal At The Emirates In European Competition, First Team In English League Football History To Win 3 Titles Back To Back On Two Seperate Ocassions
NinjabreadMan said:

Surprisingly enough I own a Wii.

Most people have read only my original post, which i'll admit wasn't a very good statement of how it is.

Still, my main gripe is with no intention of reducing the price over time like the traditional model of console business. It's true that this can be done to stimulate sales when demand falls, and demand for Wii certainly hasn't fallen. Was the model for the Wii designed around a potential low sale scenario? It could be this, and thus would allow Nintendo to still make a sizeable profit despite low numbers, ala GC.

I'd be interested in knowing exactly how much Nintendo makes on each console sold, and whether or not the manufacturing costs have fallen very much since launch.

You still don't get it, do you?   There is no sales model that suggests price drops durig high demand.   Doing so is corporate suicide.  You're investors will bail out and your stock will tank. Do I seriously need to explain this to you? 

 

You mentioned GC in tha they remained profitable despite low sales.  Guess what, GC got price drops.  Do you know why?  Because it sold poorly.   To entice more demand, push stock out the door, get retailers to buy units...you cut the price.   If demand is already up, if stock is already going out the door, if retailers are already buying units, you don't cut prices.

 

Forget it, you're just trolling and regardless of how much we tell you, I could write and MBA thesis on the subject matter and you'd still gripe, moan and complain that Nintendo should drop their price.



The rEVOLution is not being televised

luinil said:
/sigh need I comment? sure... I will bite.

Companies need profit to stay open. Its all supply and demand in this issue. Demand is still as high or higher than supply. If you lower the price the demand will increase to an even higher level, thereby further outstripping the supply... Short-sidedness is not something that business can thrive on. They know what they are doing, trust Iwata.

hey so what's shakin these days yO?



Around the Network

lol, what complete and utter stupidity.
Forgive me my harshness, but I hope you never ever get hired by a company.
Maybe government and NGO's are better suited towards you (I have nothing against those btw).

I've seen quite some insane remarks on this site but accusing a company of making money should be very high on the list.



Makes sense, should only lower price if sales fall a lot.