Probably not. I'm the condemned condemning the condemned.

In any case though, it's just weird seeing the same few people following Starcraft everywhere he goes. I understand he's going over the deep end big time with GTAIV, but others are going right in after him and BCN's sole purpose on this site at the moment is following Starcraft into every topic he enters. Hopefully in two days we can all go to just playing the game and leave this GTAIV nonsense behind us because every single topic about it in the last two days has said the exact same thing IGN said in their review, and reliving the same arguments over and over is getting mightily old.   

 there we go <3<3

 nah, the word Hypocrisy might apply here.

The truth is, Starcraft comments on the most heated, the most controvesy topic regarding PS360, and that is where most sony fans post too, I don't see it as anything more than a 'debate' forum.

Of course, it's not as creepy as "flipping through all your recent post". no? ;) 

Read my first sentence. How did you not get hypocricy out of that? I'm sorry I didn't spell it out, but that sentence doesn't have multiple meanings.

Starcraft also comments on topics that aren't heated, where he doesn't start arguments and the same people still show up to trash him. I actually feel sorry for him regarding GTAIV because I know it hit a nerve that the PS3 got a superior AAA multiplat title and he just doesn't know how to take it. If it were only about GTAIV, I would have chalked it up to coincidence. If there's some sort of moral issue you have with people being able to view eachother's recent topics, you should really talk to ioi about disabling the feature. 

 Frankly, I don't feel sorry for starcraft, much like I don't feel sorry for Carzzy or Leo-J. Why? Because sometimes they invite trouble by starting those flamebait topics themselves.

Onyxmeth, you are a xbox fan, why aren't you top of those "number 1 fanboy" list? Because you don't go out looking for trouble. Can't say the same for starcraft. 

Actually I start tons of trouble sometimes, but it's always aimed in different directions. I've been called a PS3 fanboy, an Xbox fanboy and a Wii fanboy by different people at different times. I guess I just can't make up my mind which one I want to be a fanboy of. I know it's against your ethics, but if you enter my profile, you'll see Rock On 2008 call me a Sony fanboy and then Soriku defend me by saying I prefer Nintendo.

well, nobody really takes what Rock_on seriously anyway. ;)

But you can't deny that you aren't a xbox fan, much like I can't deny that I'm a Sony fan.

nevertheless, I don't throw "you are a fanboy, that's why you are trolling here" pathetic excuse in any debate, it's for those who can't come up with anything constructive to say.

As for Starcraft, I believe the fact he denies the fact he's a Microsoft fan really pissed a lot of people off.

Hello

I don't believe there is a significant difference between the two titles (GTAIV), as evidenced by the near-identical scores (which ironically are currently only different due to lower Xbox Magazine scores), however the PS3 version is marginally technically superior. That of course, doesn't mean it will be the better version, as the Xbox 360 invariably has better online and will have exclusive episodic content. So I wouldn't consider myself to have "gone off the deep end."

OT: KingofWale, this is becoming something of an obsession. I understand that this thread has hit a nerve, as you clearly genuinly believed that everyone thought you justified in labelling me a fanboy, and that noone thought the same of you. Obviously it has to feel like a bit of a cold shower to realize that is not the case. However, this does not justify continuing your allegations with an ongoing lack of any evidence whatsoever. You must admit, when you cannot demonstrate any perpetual existence of subtle trolling, which you routinely accuse me of, and your main supporter in a thread such as this is BCNR, it doesn't make you look very good.

Try to take a more measured approach to to your posting, understanding that someone disagreeing with you isn't necessarily acting without logic, they may simply feel that their logic and evidence is more substantial and accurate then yours.

self-obsessed much? I don't remember labeling you a fanboy here and frankly, I have no problem being labeled a fanboy, And since two of your main assumptions are now false, all of your arguments are out of the window.