By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Nvidia reveals DLSS 5 , essentially applies AI filter to games in real time.

CaptainExplosion said:
sc94597 said:

Desperation.

Glossing over tragedy caused by AI.

Yes, what should be done? What are you doing? Lead by example please. 



Around the Network
sc94597 said:
CaptainExplosion said:

Glossing over tragedy caused by AI.

Yes, what should be done? What are you doing? Lead by example please. 

I'm refusing to use generative AI and speaking out for victims of AI, while you're treating teen suicides caused by AI as something we should just forget about and use even more AI. It's like you hate humanity so much that you're hoping AI causes more teen suicides, droughts from taking away drinking water, and releases even more harmful chemicals into the atmosphere, just so long as humanity is destroyed.

Makes me glad that game devs are speaking out against generative AI, and that the lawsuit filed against OpenAI over Sewell Setzer III's death was allowed to proceed.



CaptainExplosion said:
sc94597 said:

Yes, what should be done? What are you doing? Lead by example please. 

I'm refusing to use generative AI

So you never bought a game that uses DLSS?



sc94597 said:
CaptainExplosion said:

I'm refusing to use generative AI

So you never bought a game that uses DLSS?

I didn't know they used DLSS.

If you're trying to make AI sound not so bad you're failing at that. ChatGTP basically gave two teens a gun to put against their heads and told them to pull the trigger.

If Donkey Kong Bananza, Kirby Air Riders and Metroid Prime 4 were made with DLSS, then why do they bother crediting dozens of HUMANS?



sc94597 said:
CaptainExplosion said:

I'm refusing to use generative AI

So you never bought a game that uses DLSS?

I mean I have played quite a few games with DLSS, and I still oppose generative AI and avoid using it as much as I can.

Within the system we have set up, ethical consumption is essentially impossible, everything you purchase or consume has some level of unethical conduct at some point in its production and supply chain. That doesn't mean we can't advocate for positive change.

It's like that old chestnut: (Don't take this a personal jab btw, it's purely just an example)

Last edited by curl-6 - 2 days ago

Around the Network
curl-6 said:
sc94597 said:

So you never bought a game that uses DLSS?

I mean I have played quite a few games with DLSS, and I still oppose generative AI and avoid using it as much as I can.

Within the system we have set up, ethical consumption is essentially impossible, everything you purchase or consume has some level of unethical conduct at some point in its production and supply chain. That doesn't mean we can't advocate for positive change.

It's like that old chestnut: (Don't take this a personal jab btw, it's purely just an example)

Finally someone else who makes sense.



CaptainExplosion said:
sc94597 said:

So you never bought a game that uses DLSS?

I didn't know they used DLSS.

If you're trying to make AI sound not so bad you're failing at that. 

If Donkey Kong Bananza, Kirby Air Riders and Metroid Prime 4 were made with DLSS, then why do they bother crediting dozens of HUMANS?

Fair enough. Nintendo is probably going to use DLSS going forward. I sympathize with the anxiety about losing jobs. I think it is a big risk for everyone. I think the real problem is the system, not the technology it uses, but we are probably more aligned than we think. 



curl-6 said:
sc94597 said:

So you never bought a game that uses DLSS?

I mean I have played quite a few games with DLSS, and I still oppose generative AI and avoid using it as much as I can.

Within the system we have set up, ethical consumption is essentially impossible, everything you purchase or consume has some level of unethical conduct at some point in its production and supply chain. That doesn't mean we can't advocate for positive change.

It's like that old chestnut: (Don't take this a personal jab btw, it's purely just an example)

I don't disagree, but if there is a huge difference between believing humanity is going to be killed by a technology and "ethical consumption is impossible." Human extinction is pretty much a red alarm for how you should act in the world.



sc94597 said:
CaptainExplosion said:

I didn't know they used DLSS.

If you're trying to make AI sound not so bad you're failing at that. 

If Donkey Kong Bananza, Kirby Air Riders and Metroid Prime 4 were made with DLSS, then why do they bother crediting dozens of HUMANS?

Fair enough. Nintendo is probably going to use DLSS going forward. I sympathize with the anxiety about losing jobs. I think it is a big risk for everyone. I think the real problem is the system, not the technology it uses, but we are probably more aligned than we think. 

Well how do we keep AI from destroying the economy? It's not like other tech innovations where we got new jobs fixing new machines as they were adopted on a bigger scale.



sc94597 said:
curl-6 said:

I mean I have played quite a few games with DLSS, and I still oppose generative AI and avoid using it as much as I can.

Within the system we have set up, ethical consumption is essentially impossible, everything you purchase or consume has some level of unethical conduct at some point in its production and supply chain. That doesn't mean we can't advocate for positive change.

It's like that old chestnut: (Don't take this a personal jab btw, it's purely just an example)

I don't disagree, but if there is a huge difference between believing humanity is going to be killed by a technology and "ethical consumption is impossible." Human extinction is pretty much a red alarm for how you should act in the world.

I don't believe AI wipe out humanity, personally. Advocating against something is itself an action; many who believe climate change is an existential threat to humanity advocate against it but stop short of say sabotaging an oil refinery.