By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - The Trump Thread

Zkuq 19 hours ago
CaptainExplosion said:
KLXVER said:

It should have been the end after his first term. This one has been kind of a disaster. I still find him funny, but I dont think its worth it for that anymore.

And now this.

Last I checked the CEO of Paramount is a spineless Trump ally, meaning with Paramount acquiring Warner Bros. we'll see the likes of DC, Looney Tunes, CNN and Cartoon Network turned into far right propaganda bullshit.

Now America is at war with Iran, and when you attack a country like Iran you're at the very likelihood of being nuked in retaliation.

All this is happening because Fred Trump didn't use protection.

Nuked in retaliation? By who? Iran doesn't have them and even if they did, I don't think they have the capability to strike the US anyway.



Around the Network
CaptainExplosion 19 hours ago
Zkuq said:
CaptainExplosion said:

And now this.

Last I checked the CEO of Paramount is a spineless Trump ally, meaning with Paramount acquiring Warner Bros. we'll see the likes of DC, Looney Tunes, CNN and Cartoon Network turned into far right propaganda bullshit.

Now America is at war with Iran, and when you attack a country like Iran you're at the very likelihood of being nuked in retaliation.

All this is happening because Fred Trump didn't use protection.

Nuked in retaliation? By who? Iran doesn't have them and even if they did, I don't think they have the capability to strike the US anyway.

They'd still try, that's a big enough risk.



Zkuq 16 hours ago
CaptainExplosion said:
Zkuq said:

Nuked in retaliation? By who? Iran doesn't have them and even if they did, I don't think they have the capability to strike the US anyway.

They'd still try, that's a big enough risk.

Who and with what? You can't nuke anyone when you don't have any nukes to start with.



CaptainExplosion 6 hours ago
Zkuq said:
CaptainExplosion said:

They'd still try, that's a big enough risk.

Who and with what? You can't nuke anyone when you don't have any nukes to start with.

They had nukes last time I checked, and they've got backup from Russia.



SvennoJ 6 hours ago
CaptainExplosion said:
Zkuq said:

Who and with what? You can't nuke anyone when you don't have any nukes to start with.

They had nukes last time I checked, and they've got backup from Russia.

Checked what?

If Iran had nukes they would have threatened using them to prevent what's happening right now.

If Iran had nukes Trump would not have bombed Iran.



Around the Network
CaptainExplosion 5 hours ago
SvennoJ said:
CaptainExplosion said:

They had nukes last time I checked, and they've got backup from Russia.

Checked what?

If Iran had nukes they would have threatened using them to prevent what's happening right now.

If Iran had nukes Trump would not have bombed Iran.

Yes he would because he's stupid enough to do that just to distract from the Epstein files.



SvennoJ 4 hours ago
CaptainExplosion said:
SvennoJ said:

Checked what?

If Iran had nukes they would have threatened using them to prevent what's happening right now.

If Iran had nukes Trump would not have bombed Iran.

Yes he would because he's stupid enough to do that just to distract from the Epstein files.

Checked what? What is your source for Iran having nukes.



Zkuq 1 hour ago
CaptainExplosion said:
Zkuq said:

Who and with what? You can't nuke anyone when you don't have any nukes to start with.

They had nukes last time I checked, and they've got backup from Russia.

Nothing I've ever seen supports that, so unless you have credible sources, you checked poorly. Russia most definitely isn't willing to nuke anyone over Iran, let alone the US. They can't even threaten anyone with nukes about Ukraine anymore, because China would get mad about that, and that's something Russia has much deeper interest in.

Last edited by Zkuq - 1 hour ago