Sony and Nintendo both make video game consoles, so surely they are competition for each other right?
Well I've had conflicting thoughts on the matter. In some ways they definitely are in competition, and in some ways they are not. So I'm going to lay out my for's and against's and see if a conclusion can be made.
Arguments in favour of the notion that Sony and Nintendo are in competition.
1) Both companies make video game hardware, and want you to spend time in their closed garden enviroment.
2) Money for most is limited, and you can only spend so much disposable income on video games. So you need to pick who you are spending it with.
3) There must be "Core" gamers on both systems. Otherwise why would games like Skyrim or the Witcher 3 be on both systems?
4) Many people are limited by time and storage space, so they pick one system to own and thats it.
Arguments against the notion that Sony and Nintendo are in competition.
1) Metallica and Taylor Swift are both in the same business. Selling music and concert tickets, but serve different parts of the market. Sony and Nintendo do the same.
2) Many "Core" users buy both systems anyway and spend time and money in both walled gardens.
3) Switch is treated as a portable system that gamers use when away from the home, where as the PlayStation stays in front of the big TV and is used when gamers are at home.
----------
After reflection, I think the answer is actually very nauanced and very much depends on what sort of user we are talking about. Young/adult, causal/core, income, etc. All of these change per person, but very much reflect if the user actually has to make a dollar choice between the two systems.