I suppose all the Germans who admire Adolf Hitler and flock to the far-right AfD have got it all wrong.
Legend11 correctly predicted that GTA IV will outsell Super Smash Bros. Brawl. I was wrong.
I suppose all the Germans who admire Adolf Hitler and flock to the far-right AfD have got it all wrong.
Legend11 correctly predicted that GTA IV will outsell Super Smash Bros. Brawl. I was wrong.


| Shaunodon said: It's not difficult at all to see why people who align with the liberal or socialist left, can so easily fracture and radicalise as Orwell detailed. Since they only think of the revolution for selfish ideals and not the following real world consequences. Rather than theories and concepts, I only attribute beliefs to what has actually been proven to lead people to prosperity. The freest country in the history of mankind is also the most capitalist country in the history of mankind. Abandoning what has verifiably been the most effective model for leading poor undeveloped countries to prosperity, for a social and econcomic concept that has proven to be disasterous every time, is textbook insanity. |
@underlined: not according to that 5 hour video you shared. Practically argues that groups = socialism, which means that everything is actually socialism.
"Freest country" and "most capitalist" - how do you measure these things?
By one very objective measure, the US is one of the least free. We have one of the highest per capita prison populations in the world.
How do you measure most capitalist? Most of the successful countries have mixed economies that mix private and public services.
"is textbook insanity."
What was the best model, before capitalism? Would you have argued before that happened, that it would be textbook insanity to abandon - I don't know let's say feudalism?
The horse has been the most effective model for transportation for literally thousands of years, it would be absolute insanity to even think about using anything else.
Those early attempts at airplanes were such a disaster, why would we try anything else?
Last edited by the-pi-guy - on 18 September 2025the-pi-guy said:
@underlined: not according to that 5 hour video you shared. Practically argues that groups = socialism, which means that everything is actually socialism. "Freest country" and "most capitalist" - how do you measure these things? By one very objective measure, the US is one of the least free. We have one of the highest per capita prison populations in the world. How do you measure most capitalist? Most of the successful countries have mixed economies that mix private and public services. "is textbook insanity." What was the best model, before capitalism? Would you have argued before that happened, that it would be textbook insanity to abandon - I don't know let's say feudalism? The horse has been the most effective model for transportation for literally thousands of years, it would be absolute insanity to even think about using anything else.  |
Did I say for 'anything else'? I clearly meant socialism.
If you don't understand why America is the most free country in history, it means you don't actually understand the constitution and how American rights are actually protected.
| Shaunodon said: You weren't even comfortable watching an easily accessible YouTube video, but you want to recommend a book that's practically harder to find than first prints of the bible. G.D.H Cole was the leading voice on 'Guild Socialism'-- Such a fringe off-shoot that I can't find anyone who even reviewed the particular book you mentioned. What is seemed to boil down to is barely any different from the original concept of the soviet collective shared economy that the Soviet Union was meant to be, which was very easily co-opted by the Bulshevik's under Lenin's authoritarian cult-of-personality and quickly became a death cult. Of course not only can socialists never actually agree on what their real socialism is, even the few voices from this fringe branch couldn't agree just how much state intervention would be necessary to actually force their goals. G.D.H Cole in particular seemed to lean towards Anarchism, problem being in a state-less economy with no one to actually tell people they all have to equally share their rights and income, why would anyone who creates the source of production want to share their profits with people who perform more basic tasks. ... |
What are you attempting to achieve with this post? The scope is pretty wide and all over the place.
The original topic was about the connection between Socialism and Fascism.
G.D.H Cole's sympathies to Guild Socialism are irrelevant, because in his five volumes he covers many other ideas of socialism, some directly opposed to what he believed in. Besides Guild Socialism was probably one of the more popular currents in the Anglosphere in the 1900's-1920's.
The point of bringing up the fact that G.D.H Cole had to write five volumes, each hundreds of pages on the topic, was that -- that was necessary to cover the whole ideological breadth that fell under the "socialism" umbrella. That's why you are seeing many socialists disagree on what is "truly socialist."
But one of the main themes of the book (and others that attempt to summarize the socialist movement as well) is that what connects them all is that all socialists aim to solve the social question and answer it with the transformation toward a classless society where wage-labor is not the principle relationship of production. The Nazis (and other fascist movements) rejected the social question, instead choosing to naturalize class and promote so-called "class collaboration." It is that which makes them non-socialists as the word was mutually understood between say 1840 and today.
People who might have known me on here ten years ago, would know I was a hardcore heavily ideological anarcho-capitalist for about five years. Before then I was more aligned with mainstream Republicanism. I voted for Ron Paul in 2012, as an example. I've read plenty of Mises, Hayek, Rothbard, Karl Hess, etc and use to profess their views.
For example, even today I still think Rothbard said a lot right in his Confiscation and the Homestead Principle.
And of course Karl Hess' essay he was responding to is even more on-point -- Where are the Specifics of [Libertarianism]?
|
Much of that property is stolen. Much is of dubious title. All of it is deeply intertwined with an immoral, coercive state system which has condoned, built on, and profited from slavery; has expanded through and exploited a brutal and aggressive imperial and colonial foreign policy, and continues to hold the people in a roughly serf-master relationship to political-economic power concentrations. Libertarians are concerned, first and foremost, with that most valuable of properties, the life of each individual. That is the property most brutally and constantly abused by state systems whether they are of the right or left. Property rights pertaining to material objects are seen by libertarians as stemming from and as importantly secondary to the right to own, direct, and enjoy one’s own life and those appurtenances thereto which may be acquired without coercion. Libertarians, in short, simply do not believe that theft is proper whether it is committed in the name of a state, a class, a crises, a credo, or a cliché. This is a far cry from sharing common ground with those who want to create a society in which super capitalists are free to amass vast holdings and who say that that is ultimately the most important purpose of freedom. This is proto-heroic nonsense. |
So no, I am not in some ideological bubble here. I can appreciate right-wing thinkers who at least put in the work to educate themselves, and who have excelled much beyond that. I think they're wrong and disagree with them, but their arguments are a lot better than garbage YouTube Auth-Right propaganda.
| Shaunodon said: If you don't understand why America is the most free country in history, it means you don't actually understand the constitution and how American rights are actually protected. |
I genuinely cannot fathom how anyone can look at recent US events (let alone the country's history) and actually think this.

Americans in this thread "We don't feel very free right now."
People from Oceania, "The U.S is the freest country in the world!"
Meanwhile,

Hell even if we use the right-wing libertarian Cato's freedom index, the U.S was 17th in 2024, and probably will drop from there going forward.
https://www.cato.org/human-freedom-index/2024
Using a graph that says I'm living in the freest country in the world. That tells me everything I need to know about your 'verified sources'.
Half our country doesn't even know what most of the streets are named. The media is a one-sided propaganda machine. Academia completely infiltrated. Mandatory language training and colonialist apology sessions. Now we can barely keep ourselves from slipping into third-world country status with the economy swirling the drain.
Dame Jacinda sure left some kind of revolution. Keep the revolutions in your head next time.
| Shaunodon said: Using a graph that says I'm living in the freest country in the world. That tells me everything I need to know about your 'verified sources'. Half our country doesn't even know what most of the streets are named. The media is a one-sided propaganda machine. Academia completely infiltrated. Mandatory language training and colonialist apology sessions. Now we can barely keep ourselves from slipping into third-world country status with the economy swirling the drain. Dame Jacinda sure left some kind of revolution. Keep the revolutions in your head next time. “it suffices to say that the artificial establishment of equality is as little compatible with liberty as the enforcement of unjust laws of discrimination. (It is obviously just to discriminate—within limits—between the innocent and the criminal, the adult and the infant, the combatant and the civilian, and so on.) Whereas greed, pride and arrogance are at the base of unjust discrimination, the driving motor of the egalitarian and identitarian trends is envy, jealousy and fear. “Nature†(i.e., the absence of human intervention) is anything but egalitarian; if we want to establish a complete plain we have to blast the mountains away and fill the valleys; equality thus presupposes the continuous intervention of force which, as a principle, is opposed to freedom. Liberty and equality are in essence contradictory.â€
― Liberty or Equality: The Challenge of Our Time |
You mean the right-wing libertarian American think-tank Cato is wrong? Did they not read enough Mises? Do they not understand the U.S Constitution? What a joke.
sc94597 said:
You mean the right-wing libertarian American think-tank Cato is wrong? Did they not read enough Mises? Do they not understand the U.S Constitution? What a joke. |
https://www.cato.org/blog/trumps-unimpeachable-reputation
https://www.cato.org/commentary/nationalist-threat-liberty#
What a shock.
Your obssession with 'academically approved' qualifications over what I have literally seen and experienced with my own eyes. And it's just more people with TDS.
This thread spending a whole week being unable to show the slightest bit of humanity after such a shocking event, yet constantly trying to preach how much they care about the struggles of social classes, is the real joke.
It's just discrimination re-branded with your new favourite coat of paint.
You have no idea how much this attitude has furthered the divide in Western society.
This thread isn't for serious people.