By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Trump talks out of both sides of his mouth like usual. He says that it's up to Greenland to join the USA, then sentences later he say they'll join the USA one way or another. This is yet another five-alarm fire. Trump is almost surely going to leave NATO. Now look, I'm not NATO fan. But I also view Russia's invasion of Ukraine as unjust and know the USA should not align itself with Putin. I don't want war with Russia, but it's not time to have a bromance with a dictator.
If Trump leaves NATO and invades Greenland, I only see a few outcomes
1. Greenland accepts it under immense duress, not wanting bloodshed. The USA is sanctioned heavily by NATO nations and many others.
2. Greenland fights back and gets the help of NATO. The USA could theoretically win, but Greenland and NATO countries have enough numbers relative to how much Trump wants Greenland. It would be a long-drawn out war.



Lifetime Sales Predictions 

Switch: 161 million (was 73 million, then 96 million, then 113 million, then 125 million, then 144 million, then 151 million, then 156 million)

PS5: 115 million (was 105 million) Xbox Series S/X: 40 million (was 60 million, then 67 million, then 57 million. then 48 million)

PS4: 120 mil (was 100 then 130 million, then 122 million) Xbox One: 51 mil (was 50 then 55 mil)

3DS: 75.5 mil (was 73, then 77 million)

"Let go your earthly tether, enter the void, empty and become wind." - Guru Laghima

Around the Network

Musk states "the fundamental weakness of Western civilization is empathy". Charles Darwin, who actually researched this stuff, showed it was empathy, specifically, that enabled humanity to flourish.

[image or embed]

— Dave Vetter (@davidrvetter.bsky.social) 5 March 2025 at 09:57


"Your CHIPS Act is a horrible, horrible thing," Trump said during a joint address to Congress on Tuesday night. "You should get rid of the CHIP Act, and whatever's left over, Mr. Speaker, you should use it to reduce debt, or any other reason you want to." That landed with a thud among the Republicans who backed the sweeping legislation two and half years ago.

"I have to admit, I was surprised," Sen. Todd Young of Indiana, the Republican co-author of the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act, told reporters on Wednesday morning. "It's been one of the greatest successes of our time."

The bill included $39 billion in subsidies for chip manufacturing in the US, plus $13.2 billion for semiconductor research and workforce development. The goal of the legislation was to make the US less reliant on chips manufactured in Taiwan, create US manufacturing jobs, and bolster competition with China — something that was especially important for national security-minded Republicans.

It passed both chambers on a bipartisan basis, garnering the enthusiastic support of then-Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, plus the support of 16 other GOP senators and virtually all Democrats.

Trump Wants Republicans to Kill CHIPS Act. They May Just Ignore Him. - Business Insider

Less than an hour after President Donald Trump finished his joint address to Congress on Tuesday, lawyers cited his words as evidence in a lawsuit challenging Elon Musk's role in the administration's drastic cuts to federal spending, workers and services.

Lawyers representing a group of nonprofits and unions that are challenging the legality of the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, included an excerpt from the speech in their filing Tuesday with the U.S. District Court for Washington, D.C., to argue that more information is "urgently needed to ascertain the nature" of the budget-slashing group.

The White House has represented that DOGE is run by acting administrator Amy Gleason, rather than by Musk. However, during his address before a joint session of Congress Tuesday, Trump clearly identified Musk as the person running DOGE, seemingly contradicting his own administration.

Lawyers Use Trump's Speech Before Congress In Suit Against DOGE - ABC News

Some "Russian Warship" vibes here from a tiny fed'l agency.

via Brett Murphy:

The African Development Foundation (budget ~$40 million) is putting up a fight and denying DOGE + Pete Marocco — the State Dept official dismantling USAID — access to their building:

[image or embed]

— Jesse Eisinger (@jeisinger.bsky.social) 5 March 2025 at 17:20



Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is not open to lifting Canada’s full package of retaliatory tariffs if US President Donald Trump leaves any tariffs on Canada in place, according to a senior Canadian government official.

Trudeau’s government is cool to the idea of a “middle ground” settlement in the trade war floated by US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. In particular, any scenario where Canada has to fully rescind its retaliatory tariffs in return for a partial rollback of American tariffs will be rejected by the Canadian prime minister, said the official, speaking on condition they not be identified.

Canada Won’t Scrap Tariffs Unless Trump Lifts All US Levies, Official Says - Bloomberg

Senators Tell Elon Musk DOGE Federal Cuts Must Be Approved By Congress

Sen. Graham says he's in line with Rand Paul's push for DOGE cuts to be voted on in a rescissions package "There's a political element to this we're missing… We're losing altitude here" Says he thinks Musk was surprised to learn of rescissions process. Musk pumped his fists. Graham also said he could understand why veterans would get "rattled" by reading press reports about 80k layoffs at the VA. Said he didn't want to be reading about it in the press & wants to hear from Doug Collins directly on it

Also Graham.



China issued a warning on Tuesday night that it stands ready for any "type of war" with the United States in the aftermath of tariffs imposed hours earlier by the Trump administration. A spokesperson for the Chinese foreign ministry said the tariffs would not lead to a resolution of U.S. concerns about fentanyl originating in China.

"If the U.S. truly wants to solve the fentanyl issue, then the right thing to do is to consult with China on the basis of equality, mutual respect and mutual benefit to address each other's concerns," Chinese spokesperson Lin Jian said at a press conference late Tuesday. "If the U.S. has other agenda in mind and if war is what the U.S. wants, be it a tariff war, a trade war or any other type of war, we're ready to fight till the end," the spokesperson added.

China Says It Is Ready For 'Any Type Of War' With US - BBC News

President Donald Trump's plan to use the U.S. naval base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, to detain 30,000 immigrants has been hitting major legal, logistical and financial hurdles ever since he surprised many in his own administration by announcing it. Now, as agencies spar over responsibility for operations there and over blame for what has gone wrong, there is a growing recognition within the administration that it was a political decision that is just not working.

Among the major issues, especially as the Trump administration works to slash spending throughout the government, is the cost. Taking detained immigrants to Guantánamo means flying them there, and the administration has sometimes chosen to use military planes that are expensive to operate. The Defense Department calculates the cost per flight hour to operate a C-130 at $20,756, so for a trip of five to six hours, it cost the Pentagon $207,000 to $249,000 round trip, or $23,000 to $27,000 per detainee.

Trump Admin Rethinking Guantánamo Immigrant Detention Plan

The U.S. Department of Agriculture must reinstate 5,900 fired employees for at least 45 days, per an order issued Wednesday by the Merit Systems Protection Board, an agency that handles federal worker complaints. These firings were likely unlawful, the board ruled. Probationary workers can only be terminated if their performance or conduct demonstrates they're unfit for their jobs.

USDA Ordered To Reinstate 5,900 Fired Probationary Workers

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Department of Veterans Affairs is planning an "aggressive" reorganization that includes cutting 80,000 jobs from the sprawling agency that provides health care for retired military members, according to an internal memo obtained by The Associated Press.

The VA's chief of staff, Christopher Syrek, told top level officials at the agency that it had an objective to cut enough employees to return to 2019 staffing levels of just under 400,000. That would require terminating tens of thousands of employees after the VA expanded during the Biden administration, as well as to cover veterans impacted by burn pits under the 2022 PACT Act.

Trump Administration Plans To Cut 80,000 Employees From VA | AP News

She responded: “We have a fiscal responsibility to use taxpayer dollars to pay people that actually work. That doesn’t mean that we forget our veterans by any means. We are going to care for them in the right way, but perhaps they’re not fit to have a job at this moment, or not willing to come to work.”

Habba Says Veterans Aren't 'Fit' For Work



Around the Network

I try to either read conservative threads or even try talking to conservatives to try to understand where they're coming from. 

There are plenty of things that I understand, even if I think these things are more complicated. Like yeah I can understand the appeal of lower taxes.

I personally just want the best system. If private industry could handle roads in a fair way for cheap, I would be fine with that. I am generally pretty left wing, but I'm not set on a specific system if that makes sense. I generally believe that private industry isn't going to be what works best when there is a conflict of interests. If US healthcare was able to cover everyone and do it cheaper than anyone else, I would be thrilled with that.

I just want a system that's the best it can be. Which can be tricky because sometimes you're just picking different pros and cons. But I want to have those conversations. 

There are left wingers who talk about anarchism, there are left wingers who think there needs to be some sort of system to prevent abusers from creating a system of abuse. Maybe some of these systems (or lack of systems) are too idealistic. I don't know, I'm not attached to the idea that things have to work a certain way, again I just want to work towards whatever works best for everyone. Not just the top 1%, not just the majority. 

But there are a lot of things I just can't understand. There are plenty of conservative talking points that pretty much require denying reality. I just saw a Facebook post where literally thousands of conservatives were liking comments about how "America is respected again". I don't know how you can look at most countries and feel that we are respected again. A lot of countries are rightfully abandoning our crap and looking for other leadership. 

I'm so terrified of where we are at right now. I have no clue what we can do. How do we do the right thing, when so much of the country would rather not? 

How do we have a conversation when people would rather rationalize insanity?

I feel like if AOC said 2+2=4, a lot of these people would call her an idiot - maybe for saying something so obvious. While if Trump said 2+2=5, these people would twist themselves into a pretzel and explain that he's playing 4D chess to make himself look dumber so he's underestimated on the world stage. Or that he's just kidding. Or that he's actually a genius because sometimes 2+2 really is 5.  

I am legitimately scared of what the future holds. 

I am scared for Ukraine. 

I am scared for the recession that is sure to come up. 

I am scared for climate change. 

I keep feeling like the best shot is to have conservatives go through with what they're doing. And once it starts hurting enough people, that there will be a shift. But I wish there was a better way. 

Last edited by the-pi-guy - 3 days ago

French Senator Claude Malhuret:

"Washington has become Nero’s court, with an incendiary emperor, submissive courtiers and a jester high on ketamine... We were at war with a dictator, we are now at war with a dictator backed by a traitor."

[image or embed]

— Adam Schwarz (@adamjschwarz.bsky.social) 5 March 2025 at 15:47

Malhuret comes from the centre-right in France. This is part of a trend we're seeing across Europe and Canada. Centre-right politicians and media are not merely abandoning Trump as a phony ideological ally, but are now strongly denouncing him as the malign tyrant of a former ally turned rogue state.

— Adam Schwarz (@adamjschwarz.bsky.social) 5 March 2025 at 17:25


Full Speech

Mr. President

Mr. Prime Minister,

Ladies and Gentlemen Ministers,

My dear colleagues,

Europe is at a critical juncture in its history. The American shield is slipping away, Ukraine is in danger of being abandoned, Russia strengthened.

Washington became the court of Nero, an incendiary emperor, submissive courtiers, and a jester on ketamine charged with purging the civil service.

This is a tragedy for the free world, but it is first and foremost a tragedy for the United States. Trump's message is that there is no point in being his ally since he will not defend you, that he will impose more tariffs on you than on his enemies and will threaten you with taking your territories while supporting the dictatorships that invade you.

The king of the deal is showing what the art of the deal is all about. He thinks he will intimidate China by lying down in front of Putin, but Xi Jinping, faced with such a shipwreck, is undoubtedly accelerating preparations for the invasion of Taiwan.

Never in history has a president of the United States capitulated to the enemy. Never has one supported an aggressor against an ally. Never has anyone trampled on the American Constitution, issued so many illegal decrees, dismissed the judges who could prevent it, fired the military staff in one fell swoop, weakened all checks and balances and taken control of social networks.

This is not an illiberal drift, it is the beginning of the confiscation of democracy. Let us remember that it took only one month, three weeks and two days to bring down the Weimar Republic and its Constitution.

I have confidence in the strength of American democracy and the country is already protesting. But in one month, Trump has done more harm to America than in the four years of his last presidency. We were at war with a dictator, now we are fighting against a dictator supported by a traitor.

Eight days ago, just as Trump was putting his hand behind Macron's back in the White House, the United States was voting at the UN with Russia and North Korea against the Europeans demanding the departure of Russian troops.

Two days later, in the Oval Office, the draft dodger gave moral and strategic lessons to war hero Zelensky before dismissing him like a groom and ordering him to submit or resign.

Last night, he took another step in infamy by stopping the delivery of weapons that had been promised. What to do in the face of this betrayal? The answer is simple: cope.

And first of all, not to make mistakes. The defeat of Ukraine would be the defeat of Europe. The Baltic States, Georgia and Moldova are already on the list. Putin's goal is to return to Yalta, where half of the continent was ceded to Stalin.

The countries of the South are waiting for the outcome of the conflict to decide whether they should continue to respect Europe or whether they are now free to trample on it.

What Putin wants is an end to the order put in place by the United States and its allies 80 years ago, with the first principle being the prohibition of acquiring territory by force.

This idea is at the very source of the UN, where today Americans vote for the aggressor and against the aggressed, because Trump's vision coincides with Putin's: a return to spheres of influence, with the great powers dictating the fate of small countries.

Greenland, Panama and Canada are mine, Ukraine, the Baltic States and Eastern Europe are yours, and Taiwan and the China Sea are yours.

In the evenings of the oligarchs of the Gulf of Mar-a-Lago, this is called "diplomatic realism".

So we are alone. But the narrative that Putin cannot be resisted is false. Contrary to the Kremlin's propaganda, Russia is in trouble. In three years, the so-called second largest army in the world has only managed to snatch crumbs from a country with a population three times smaller.

Interest rates at 25%, the collapse of foreign exchange and gold reserves, and the demographic collapse show that it is on the brink of the abyss. The U.S. push to Putin is the greatest strategic mistake ever made in a war.

The shock is violent, but it has a virtue. The Europeans are coming out of denial. They understood in one day in Munich that the survival of Ukraine and the future of Europe are in their hands and that they have three imperatives.

Accelerate military aid to Ukraine to compensate for the American abandonment, so that it holds, and of course to impose its presence and that of Europe in any negotiations.

It will be expensive. The taboo on the use of frozen Russian assets will have to be ended. It will be necessary to bypass Moscow's accomplices within Europe itself by a coalition of the willing countries alone, with of course the United Kingdom.

Secondly, to demand that any agreement be accompanied by the return of kidnapped children, prisoners and absolute security guarantees. After Budapest, Georgia and Minsk, we know what the agreements with Putin are worth. These guarantees require sufficient military force to prevent a new invasion.

Finally, and this is the most urgent, because it is what will take the longest, we should build the neglected European defence, in favour of the American umbrella since 1945 and scuttled since the fall of the Berlin Wall.

It is a Herculean task, but it is on its success or failure that the leaders of today's democratic Europe will be judged in the history books.

Friedrich Merz has just declared that Europe needs its own military alliance. This is to recognize that France has been right for decades in pleading for strategic autonomy.

It remains to be built. It will be necessary to invest massively, to strengthen the European Defence Fund outside the Maastricht debt criteria, to harmonise weapons and ammunition systems, to accelerate the entry into the Union of Ukraine, which is today the leading European army, to rethink the place and conditions of nuclear deterrence based on French and British capabilities, and to relaunch the anti-missile shield and satellite programmes.

The plan announced yesterday by Ursula von der Leyen is a very good starting point. And much more will be needed.

Europe will only become a military power again by becoming an industrial power again. In a word, the Draghi report will have to be applied. For good.

But the real rearmament of Europe is its moral rearmament.

We must convince the public in the face of the weariness and fear of war, and especially in the face of Putin's cronies, the far right and the far left.

Yesterday in the National Assembly, Prime Minister, they pleaded again before you, against European unity, against European defence.

They say they want peace. What neither they nor Trump are saying is that their peace is capitulation, the peace of defeat, the replacement of de Gaulle Zelensky by a Ukrainian Pétain under Putin's thumb.

The peace of the collaborators who have refused any help to the Ukrainians for three years.

Is this the end of the Atlantic Alliance? The risk is great. But in recent days, Zelensky's public humiliation and all the crazy decisions taken over the past month have finally made the Americans react.

The polls are falling. Republican elected officials are greeted by hostile crowds in their constituencies. Even Fox News is becoming critical.

The Trumpists are no longer in majesty. They control the executive, parliament, the Supreme Court and social networks.

But in American history, the supporters of freedom have always won. They are starting to raise their heads.

The fate of Ukraine is being played out in the trenches, but it also depends on those in the United States who want to defend democracy, and here on our ability to unite Europeans, to find the means of their common defence, and to make Europe the power it once was in history and which it is reluctant to become again.

Our parents defeated fascism and communism at the cost of all sacrifices.

The task of our generation is to defeat the totalitarianisms of the twenty-first century.

Long live free Ukraine, long live democratic Europe.

"We Are Fighting Against a Dictator Backed by a Traitor" – A French Senator Speaks Out

Video is better translated.

Last edited by Ryuu96 - 3 days ago

Comparing our latest quarterly data with the last poll prior to Donald Trump’s re-election, favourable attitudes towards the United States have fallen by between six and 28 percentage points. In Great Britain, Denmark, Sweden, Spain and Italy, these are the lowest figures for USA favourability since we began tracking this question.*

More than half of people in Britain (53%), Germany (56%), Sweden (63%) and Denmark (74%) now have an unfavourable opinion of the USA. Italy proves to be the only country in which the number of people with a negative view of the US do not outnumber those with a positive view – but even here Italians are divided 42%-42%.

European Favourability of the USA Falls Following the Return of Donald Trump | YouGov

It's not been a good few weeks for Donald Trump in the eyes of those Britons who support Reform UK. In the past two and a half weeks, during which the US president has completely changed his country's approach to the Ukraine war and publicly rowed with Volodymyr Zelenskyy, his favourability rating in the UK has dropped from 22% to 15%.

Eight in ten Britons (80%) now have an unfavourable view of Donald Trump, up from 73% two weeks ago, while the number of Britons with a positive view of the US president has correspondingly fallen seven points to 15%. Donald Trump’s favourability has taken such a knock that he is now unpopular overall among Reform UK voters. The proportion with a negative view of the president has risen fully 25 points to 53% since mid-February, while the number with a favourable view has fallen from a commanding 66% to just 45% now.

By contrast, Volodymyr Zelenskyy has increased in popularity, with the proportion of Britons with a favourable view of the Ukrainian leader increasing from 64% to 71%. Again, the shift is largest among Reform UK voters, among whom he is now more popular than Donald Trump. The number with a favourable view of Zelenskyy has increased from 49% to 62% over the last fortnight, while those with an unfavourable view has declined from 37% to 27%.

Reform Voters Turn on Farage's Friend Trump | Politics News | Sky News



Meanwhile, Russia has gone from 80% unfavourable opinion of America to an 90% favourable opinion of America!

Lul. Jk. They're still making videos about nuking America. Their State TV is still edging at the thought of slaughtering all Americans. The Russian leadership still hates Americans with everything they have but at least Donald Trump is selling out America to them.

Last edited by Ryuu96 - 3 days ago