By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

It's getting closer.  5 days closer for some.



...to avoid getting banned for inactivity, I may have to resort to comments that are of a lower overall quality and or beneath my moral standards.

Around the Network
DroidKnight said:

Just showing off how slow I roll.  Completed the campaign on Veteran, barely level 51 Barbarian.  Now to begin some of the endgame stuff and maybe get another class started.

Here are the stats from the How long to beat Diablo IV page.

There needs to be a WTF? section added for mine.

I'm also level 51 on my Sorcereress, but I'm not even through act 3 yet on the main story. I've been exploring each district of the map fully and finding all altars of lilith in each, doing about half of each districts side quests, and doing a few of the side dungeons, as I go through each district as the main story takes me there. Just got to the left bottom map disctrict in act 3, and I've only done a single side quest and a single side dungeon there so far, still have to go find all of the altars in that map. Then after that I still have the bottom right district to fully explore and do side quests in as well. Going to take me more than a week to finish the main campaign at this rate.

Last edited by shikamaru317 - on 02 July 2023

Ryuu96 said:

If I stepped down from Mod, would people feel less comfortable as Xbox fans on this website or about the same? To be honest, there's only two reasons why I'm holding onto the position at this stage and this thread is one of them, I'm conflicted and unable to make a decision, Lol.

100% i dont think you should step down. Your view is always sound you explain your opinions well. Heck your one of the best mods on the site.





We haven't talked too much about the Statement of Issues from New Zealand, but they also think that Nintendo does not compete with Sony or MS:

We do not currently consider that the merged entity would have the ability or incentive to foreclose Nintendo in any market. Nintendo focuses primarily on its own first-party games such as the popular Mario franchise. As a result, it does not appear to compete closely with Sony or Microsoft, and instead is marketed as a more family-friendly, casual offering.

Source: Idas

Guess it really is The Five Eyes vs The Rest of the World

Won't be surprised if Canada, Australia and New Zealand join the block soon as a last ditch effort to support UK.

Last edited by Ryuu96 - on 03 July 2023

Around the Network
Ryuu96 said:

We haven't talked too much about the Statement of Issues from New Zealand, but they also think that Nintendo does not compete with Sony or MS:

We do not currently consider that the merged entity would have the ability or incentive to foreclose Nintendo in any market. Nintendo focuses primarily on its own first-party games such as the popular Mario franchise. As a result, it does not appear to compete closely with Sony or Microsoft, and instead is marketed as a more family-friendly, casual offering.

Source: Idas

Guess it really is The Five Eyes vs The Rest of the World

Won't be surprised if Canada, Australia and New Zealand join the block soon as a last ditch effort to support UK.

Yeah, they are purposefully ignoring that companies find niches in markets all the time, it's not uncommon, yet they are still considered part of the market. Also the number of non-exclusive titles by far eclipses the number of exclusive even on the Switch. Nintendo is still responding to gamers' needs and if they did not exist their users would most likely resort to buying an Xbox/PS.

Also, Nintendo's Number of exclusives and Sony's are very much on par there's only Microsoft that features way less than both others. In that way, and since we are responding to a dumb market definition we could make one for ourselves and view both Sony and Nintendo as a duopoly that accepted to separate the market along different appeal for first-party content while MS try to challenge both established juggernaut mostly with 3rd party support and doing so are trying to compete more closely with PlayStation first. Then blocking this deal is a win for the established duopoly.

What's even more silly with this definition is even if we accept it's true, the merger still does not place MS anywhere near a dominant position over Sony the likes Sony enjoys over Xbox currently even without deals MS offered. So those authorities are not protecting consumers from anti-competitive behavior, they are preventing competition from increasing in a market that lacks a proper level of it. The worst is we know all those challenges are tied to high levels of communication between those different authorities trying to coordinate efforts so that one circumvents the legal limits of the others and artificially increases 'credibility' in a bid to hide what's is only an anti-big-tech stance without actual merits.

Last edited by EpicRandy - on 03 July 2023

shikamaru317 said:

I'm also level 51 on my Sorcereress, but I'm not even through act 3 yet on the main story. I've been exploring each district of the map fully and finding all altars of lilith in each, doing about half of each districts side quests, and doing a few of the side dungeons, as I go through each district as the main story takes me there. Just got to the left bottom map disctrict in act 3, and I've only done a single side quest and a single side dungeon there so far, still have to go find all of the altars in that map. Then after that I still have the bottom right district to fully explore and do side quests in as well. Going to take me more than a week to finish the main campaign at this rate.

I sped up my campaign play-though because the world monsters stop leveling up at level 50.  I didn't want to be OP for the final acts.



...to avoid getting banned for inactivity, I may have to resort to comments that are of a lower overall quality and or beneath my moral standards.

If Nintendo doesn't compete with the others then it does mean Sony's dominance is huge if MS is the only competitor. It would also mean that MS bringing Activision games to Nintendo could be a start to let Nintendo compete with their platform because it wouldn't be only about first party games anymore if Nintendo platforms would also get good third party support, right? RIIIIGHHHTT?

I can look at it from any perspective but I just never find a good reason why this merger needs to be blocked from a consumer or competitive perspective.



ice said:

Alright guys, let's all join a pact to buy neptunia physical day 1

I better see you and the other person who liked this post buy nep nep day one

Unless it was Ryuu, than nvm. 

I don't need a pact to buy Japanese games on Xbox. BANG BANG. 

@Goatseye hope to see you buy nep nep on xbox as well. @NobleTeam360 and you.



https://www.trueachievements.com/gamercards/SliferCynDelta.png%5B/IMG%5D">https://www.trueachievements.com/gamer/SliferCynDelta"><img src="https://www.trueachievements.com/gamercards/SliferCynDelta.png

Noble & America's bday tomorrow. Iconic.

Yall need to get noble something.



https://www.trueachievements.com/gamercards/SliferCynDelta.png%5B/IMG%5D">https://www.trueachievements.com/gamer/SliferCynDelta"><img src="https://www.trueachievements.com/gamercards/SliferCynDelta.png