Wilkinson: it's not essential input. Big difference between being necessary as the case law says and "wonderful" etc.
— Florian Mueller (@FOSSpatents) June 30, 2023
Much more content because of suscription services, everyone would like to own the Bond franchise but only 1 owns. Doesn't mean others aren't successful.
🧵152/X
Now Microsoft points out that FFXVI only on PS not Xbox.
— Florian Mueller (@FOSSpatents) June 30, 2023
No consumer is entitled to have the exact content they want. But in this case there's lots of competitors.
🧵154/X
FTC: if we had that document, we wouldn't have filed the case.
— Florian Mueller (@FOSSpatents) June 30, 2023
Judge Corley interrupts, but FTC insists: case law does not require they show something is a "must have", trying to point to $70B as evidence of scarcity
🧵156/X
Judge points FTC to the fact that without the merger Activision wouldn't put CoD on a subscription service.
— Florian Mueller (@FOSSpatents) June 30, 2023
FTC trying to argue an independent Activision would do deals with multiple services.
🧵158/X
Judge looking at FTC, says different evidence where very difficult to divest. Here, the parent-subsidiary relationship. She says if we stop the merger, there are some private equities, that's why we're here in such a rush.
— Florian Mueller (@FOSSpatents) June 30, 2023
🧵160/X