By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Ryuu96 said:
coolbeans said:

It's funny how much better off MS would be - quality wise - if they'd just made moves for Thunderful, Remedy, IO Interactive, & 11 bit Studios. Never have to deal with this international headache and didn't have to give Kotick a golden parachute.

Add Sega + Paradox.

I know you weren't talking financially but I did want to talk about it though, I don't know how Microsoft will reach their goal of doubling their Gaming revenue to $30bn by 2030 without ABK...That seems like a very lofty goal, Imo. Even with ABK, I think they'll need a few more studios or maybe one more publisher.

I know what you mean, but you're muddying up my point.  I'm trying to emphasize just how 'little' ($$$ wise) your acquisition aims need to be in order to impress me more than the current Acti-Blizz deal.



Around the Network

This is very interesting.

The CMA wants to delay the hearing to October 2nd:

The CMA submits that the Application has been made as a last resort to protect the public interest in ensuring that the CMA is able fairly to defend the decision at any substantive hearing, and so that the CMA can provide effective assistance to the Tribunal. If the hearing were adjourned to 2 October 2023, the CMA considers it would be able to prepare and present its case.

It really seems like the CMA is feeling the pressure now; they don't think that the case can be prepared for the end of July:

"The position has now been reached in which First Treasury Counsel's view is as follows: it is not possible for the case to be prepared and presented effectively on behalf of the CMA on the current timescales with the hearing at the end of July (ie four weeks away). The case involves very important points of principle; and a subject matter of considerable importance to the public interest. It is enormously detailed and complex, especially given the very large volume of new factual and expert evidence adduced by Microsoft as noted in paragraph 6 above. Even if a third suitable KC were now to be found, it would not be possible for the necessary preparation to be done effectively."

The CMA says that if the hearing happens on July 28th it wouldn't be proportionate:

The CMA, supported by Prevett 1, contends that the existing hearing date would not be in the interests of justice or proportionate. To the contrary, it would result in prejudice and injustice to the CMA and the public interests it seeks to represent.

On the other hand, it sounds like MS/ABK are seriously challenging the draft final order (as MLex said) and the CMA will likely need more time with it:

"There have been a range of other developments in relation to the proceedings which either have already, or will soon, divert significant resources of the CMA away from the preparations for the hearing. These include an increase in the scale of work that will be involved in relation to a consultation procedure on a final order in relation to the CMA's merger decision in this case. These developments mean that senior staff who have subject matter expertise in relation to the decision challenged in these proceedings are unlikely to be able to provide sufficient assistance to the CMA's representatives at the times when it will be required if the hearing is to start at the end of July."

So, now time is of the essence for everyone: MS, ABK, the FTC and the CMA.

If MS wins the FTC, this will add even more pressure to the CMA. Could that open a window for a settlement? 🤔

Extremely fascinating times ahead.

Source: Idas



Good to see CAT doing it's job. Tell the CMA to piss off





Ryuu96 said:

This is very interesting.

The CMA wants to delay the hearing to October 2nd:

The CMA submits that the Application has been made as a last resort to protect the public interest in ensuring that the CMA is able fairly to defend the decision at any substantive hearing, and so that the CMA can provide effective assistance to the Tribunal. If the hearing were adjourned to 2 October 2023, the CMA considers it would be able to prepare and present its case.

It really seems like the CMA is feeling the pressure now; they don't think that the case can be prepared for the end of July:

"The position has now been reached in which First Treasury Counsel's view is as follows: it is not possible for the case to be prepared and presented effectively on behalf of the CMA on the current timescales with the hearing at the end of July (ie four weeks away). The case involves very important points of principle; and a subject matter of considerable importance to the public interest. It is enormously detailed and complex, especially given the very large volume of new factual and expert evidence adduced by Microsoft as noted in paragraph 6 above. Even if a third suitable KC were now to be found, it would not be possible for the necessary preparation to be done effectively."

The CMA says that if the hearing happens on July 28th it wouldn't be proportionate:

The CMA, supported by Prevett 1, contends that the existing hearing date would not be in the interests of justice or proportionate. To the contrary, it would result in prejudice and injustice to the CMA and the public interests it seeks to represent.

On the other hand, it sounds like MS/ABK are seriously challenging the draft final order (as MLex said) and the CMA will likely need more time with it:

"There have been a range of other developments in relation to the proceedings which either have already, or will soon, divert significant resources of the CMA away from the preparations for the hearing. These include an increase in the scale of work that will be involved in relation to a consultation procedure on a final order in relation to the CMA's merger decision in this case. These developments mean that senior staff who have subject matter expertise in relation to the decision challenged in these proceedings are unlikely to be able to provide sufficient assistance to the CMA's representatives at the times when it will be required if the hearing is to start at the end of July."

So, now time is of the essence for everyone: MS, ABK, the FTC and the CMA.

If MS wins the FTC, this will add even more pressure to the CMA. Could that open a window for a settlement? 🤔

Extremely fascinating times ahead.

Source: Idas

MS gonna shove ABK down the UK's throat once they're done with the FTC lol



Around the Network

CMA is just learning from the best (FTC) that when you don't have a case, delay, delay, delay, until the other guy drops out.



Baldur's Gate 3 moving forward on PC to August 3rd and the PS5 port to......September 6th. Interesting caption here Sony taking shots at Starfield's console framerate?



EspadaGrim said:
Ryuu96 said:

Since Jim Ryan's statement, 2 publishers have came out in SUPPORT of Game Pass, haha.

They saw their name in the top 17 and want that M$ Money lol, getting bought by Xbox would actually help this studio though.

Lmao, were they really on that list?

Get that bag devs. 



https://www.trueachievements.com/gamercards/SliferCynDelta.png%5B/IMG%5D">https://www.trueachievements.com/gamer/SliferCynDelta"><img src="https://www.trueachievements.com/gamercards/SliferCynDelta.png

gtotheunit91 said:

Baldur's Gate 3 moving forward on PC to August 3rd and the PS5 port to......September 6th. Interesting caption here Sony taking shots at Starfield's console framerate?

Just a 6 day delay isn't bad.  I'm really looking forward to this one as well.  



...to avoid getting banned for inactivity, I may have to resort to comments that are of a lower overall quality and or beneath my moral standards.

gtotheunit91 said:

Baldur's Gate 3 moving forward on PC to August 3rd and the PS5 port to......September 6th. Interesting caption here Sony taking shots at Starfield's console framerate?

Damn get rekt Midfield  



https://www.trueachievements.com/gamercards/SliferCynDelta.png%5B/IMG%5D">https://www.trueachievements.com/gamer/SliferCynDelta"><img src="https://www.trueachievements.com/gamercards/SliferCynDelta.png