By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Russia and Ukraine flashpoint

And I hate to say it but I'm about 99% sure that Ukraine won't be joining NATO for a minimum of 10 years because there's too many cowards in the West. How long does Ukraine have to wait for the West to grow some balls? Sadly, a pessimistic side of me thinks that Ukraine may not even join NATO in my lifetime, NATO can talk shit about Ukraine "will join NATO" all they like, when Ukraine has already been waiting for 16 years.

All it takes is one country to veto, if it's not Orban it will be Scholz, if it's not Scholz it'll be Fico, if it's not Fico it will be Harris (or Trump). France and Germany are trending rightward towards parties that love Russia, as will UK in about 4-5 years from now if Labour doesn't pull off a miracle. You may say that Orban, Scholz, Biden/Harris/Trump, Fico will be gone soon, but it's almost equally as likely that someone replaces them with their exact same stances.

For Ukraine to join NATO the war is going to have to finish (will be years), then, if Ukraine has reclaimed its territory, great, but if Ukraine has lost territory then to join NATO they'd have to officially surrender it so that Ukraine isn't currently in conflict, then they'd probably need a period of peace, then we'd need a number of politicians with completely different mindsets to takeover in the West and if Russia is still lobbing missiles across the border at Ukraine or still do minor border raids then they sure as shit aren't joining NATO.

Which is why Ukraine joining was never the issue, because Ukraine was nowhere near joining NATO because as long as Russia had Crimea and sent cause a little regional conflict in the Donbas, NATO was never going to allow Ukraine in. Literally all Russia needs to do is lob a missile across the border at Ukraine every month or so and NATO wouldn't go anywhere near letting Ukraine in. It was always that simple to scare off the likes of America/Germany.

But I've refrained from saying this because it's one of Ukraine's aspirations and I want to support them but I don't believe it's happening within the next 10 years at a minimum, Ukraine probably thinks it's not happening at least for a few years though. So they're not saying "PUT US IN NATO TOMORROW" but at least give them assurances they will be in NATO rather than vague, useless words that they've said for the past 16 years. If they can't have those assurances then they'd have to find ways where UKRAINE can assurance its own defence, one of those ways is sadly, nukes. Something Trump pretends to care about, so Zelenskyy is playing to that.

Last edited by Ryuu96 - 5 hours ago

Around the Network


BFR said:

Georgia and Moldova ain't nowhere near joining NATO but I suppose Bosnia and Herzegovina will come before Ukraine.

Actually Moldova hasn't even applied, not that it matters with the issue of Transnistria, they'd be voted no too. 

Last edited by Ryuu96 - 5 hours ago

During a press conference with NATO Secretary General Rutte, President Zelensky asserted that Ukraine is already functioning as part of NATO, emphasizing that Ukrainian soldiers are on the front lines equipped with weapons from various countries, including the USA, Turkey, and Canada. He clarified that Ukraine is not pursuing nuclear weapons but is seeking security guarantees instead.

Zelensky warned that Putin will not cease his aggression unless he is stopped, describing the Russian leader as a war enthusiast. Rutte noted that China is now a factor supporting Russia's war in Ukraine and stated that there is no evidence of North Korean military involvement in the conflict. He also highlighted that NATO is increasingly collaborating with Ukraine, moving it closer to membership in the Alliance.





Around the Network



The optics are bad, always looks like America + Western Europe treat Eastern Europe like a child, it's about time that a Eastern European country had a place in these secret meetings between America, UK, France and Germany. Which is funny, considering Poland is the highest % of GDP spent on their military of all NATO countries, other eastern European countries met that 2% target before France and Germany and they're some of the strongest supporters of Ukraine. When Eastern Europe is left out it always gives me the feeling of like America + France + UK + Germany being in an exclusive club when it's Eastern Europe most at risk of Russia, they 100% deserve a seat at the table of ANY discussion relating to security matters.

Last edited by Ryuu96 - 5 hours ago



I mean, yeah. Putin, Shoigu, Gerasimov, Medvedev, Patrushev, etc...They all need a bullet.



Ryuu96 said:

I mean, yeah. Putin, Shoigu, Gerasimov, Medvedev, Patrushev, etc...They all need a bullet.

The average Russian seems to want putin to flex his military and gain territory.  The oligarchs however have repeatedly expressed a dislike of this war because it is cutting into production and profits.  If the oligarchs view holds, then we may see a more liberal and less militaristic leader after Putler.