Summary .

PS5 version has the most stable frame rate in both quality mode (4k) and frame rate mode.

The resolution of the two modes is the same on both consoles.

Textures, shadows, and draw distance are the same on both consoles.

PS5 version has the fastest load time.

When I made a Skyrim thread the other day, the response to the difference in loading time was more than I expected, so now I've made a comparison thread for another game. However, this is a network test version. It is highly likely that the performance will be improved by launch.

Well this is a much bigger difference than Skyrim, and I guess as it's a Japanese game it's to be expected that much more effort will be put into PS5.

12 seconds vs 6 seconds loading times is a bit more significant than 4v2, and the higher framerate at same resolution (or even higher resolution in dynamic performance mode) for ps5 is a clear better performance.

Xbox Series X also disables visual effects like motion blur on frame-rate mode yet still plays at a lower dynamic resolution and lower framerate. Definitely optimised better for PS5.

This looks like one of the few games with a more substantial difference in PS5 vs XSX at this stage.

Let's think about it. BF 2042 should perform a bit better on PS5. Bethesda, despite being an American company, did not create any advantages for the Series X version.

And don't companies like EA and UBI favor the Xbox? When a North American company has a good performance on Xbox, would you say that extra effort is being paid?

UBI was a French company. But they basically make their games in Canada, and their base is mainly North American gamers.

They do comparison videos now for beta code on games close to 3 months away from release? A lot of these media outlets really seem to be scraping the bottom of the barrel for content these days

I'm not really into souls-like games, but man, Elden Ring sure looks beautiful.

This video has been played more than that BF2042 comparison . I guess a lot of people played the test.