RaptorChrist on 27 November 2019
I can see this backfiring in several potential ways:
The past couple years had a "family-friendly" meta, in order to get ads with a high pay-out. It would be ironic if those same "family-friendly" channels started posting profanity in order to ensure that they aren't categorized as a kid-friendly channel. The problem is that you have some legit 6 year olds that have been watching the family-friendly channel and then get exposed to profanity. It's a lose-lose.
It is quite bullshit that a website that requires the user to 13 years old or have consent can still be subject to this egregious money-grab. At least that's the way it appears to me, with my limited knowledge (which was probably biased when being fed to me).
