89.
If it is deserving of more, it will be held back by people who are skeptical of the concept. If it is deserving of less, it won't score lower because it is Kojima.
89.
If it is deserving of more, it will be held back by people who are skeptical of the concept. If it is deserving of less, it won't score lower because it is Kojima.
My guess is 83, a bit lower than most because there are going to be a lot of "bad" or troll scores by reviewers who got too confused or some shit.
OTBWY said: I will go with a 98. Margin of error, 96-98. |
Good luck with that.
I'll go with 85. The game will be quite divisive, with a lot of praise and 100 and a lot of people that don't see the point of the game.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.