Deviation59 said:
The PSX was still a system for hardcore gamers so no, you did not see the same type of bitching about the PSX that you see about the Wii. |
Actually, it was a hardcore system only later in it's life, while Saturn and N64 were considered hardcore systems from the start. And when you look at it, they ended up being more hardcore systems than PSX. When PSX came out, it had nothing but shovelware and casual games, while all the "real" games were on either Saturn or N64. There were only a few "hardcore" games, from which PSX is remembered as "hardcore" systems. Me and my brothers had N64 and PSX (we got PSX because of the droughts N64 had), and it was a problem to find decent games for PSX, while you could get games extremely cheap, 1,70€ for some new games from the store. Those were complete crap, but sold well because of their cheap price.
The thing is, that Wii is doing exactly like PSX, with the difference that Wii actually has good games too. Or actually the whole gen is going like the fifth. Everyone was waiting for Nintendos super-powered console to come out and wipe the floor with the competitors, while no-one expected PSX to live any longer than the point N64 comes out, but it turned out that the inferior console, with a better deal for developers, was the one to wipe out the competition.
@Topic: Some things never change. The difference decade ago was, that today we have internet where we can argue, sales are easier for anyone to find and what's most important, fifth gen started from position, where there weren't a clearly dominant console, so there weren't similar change in dominance for anyone as there is between 6th and 7th gen.
But i think mrstickball pointed out one fun thing; no matter what Nintendo does, it's always going to be blamed (although, a sign about the "hardcores" interest).
@Ajax: RPG:s on PSX were pretty lame when compared to RPG:s on SNES.