GOWTLOZ said:
Supporting devs for their business practices isn't really fun. Amazing is subjective but a game with a more positive consensus is more likely to be it. If you already have various clients, why not another one. Metro looks like a once in a gen game, probably the first game of this style since Metro Last Light but with some cool new features. It looks like the Arkham City, pun intended to its predecessor. |
Supporting devs that actually make good games I enjoy, games that aren't riddled with MT's and locked to a storefront that is utter garbage for the user is more fun.
And yet there are 7+ billion people on this planet, with not everyone thinking what you think in terms of "greatness". See, just because a percentage of one populous thinking one thing is great, does not make it a "fact", or "objective" greatness, no, because then you have to ask and account for everyone else, and who on earth is going to waste their entire lives to ask all 7+ billion people?. Would you just easily assume everyone likes what you like, in order to make appear as if it were objective?.
Because I don't want to use more clients than the ones I already use?. Why can't THQ just sell the game on the storefronts I already use?. Why can't they sell their game on GoG?, oh that's right, because it uses DRM, I almost forgot about that anti-consumer part...
It looks "once in a gen" to you, but not to me, which in turn doesn't make it objectively a "once in a gen game", it's your opinion and I'll keep pointing this out, until you lot say "imo", because that's what it is.
Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.
