By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - November NPD 2018 Thread

JSG87 said:
colafitte said:

Wow, those numbers prove to me that PS4+XBO are more impressive than what Switch is doing, or that Switch is not that impressive as you could think. Let me explain:

1. PS4 and XBO launched at the same time at way higher prices, fighting for the same kind of cosumer (COD, NBA2K, FIFA, BF, .....)

2. XBO had to fight against its own annoucement disaster.

3. Both had to fight too against their own previous consoles because during 2014, a lot of games still had a lot of sales on X360 and PS3.

4. I can only think about one new game with huge sales and 90+ metacritic in that period of time in XBO and PS4, being The Witcher III. And probably GTA V and TLOU Remastered were the best games on PS4 prior to that, both games from the previous gen.

5. Meanwhile, Switch probably had the best 12, 18, 21 first months of a new console ever, launching with a GOTY game, a Mario Kart game, a Super Mario 3D game, a huge recent new IP in Splatoon 2, all in a period of less than 9 months, and in the next 12, Switch launched new Pokemon and Smash (being this one probably the most succesful Nintendo game ever at launch) games. Nintendo went all in, and did their best possible. Compare that to Microsoft and Sony 1st party exclusive during the same period....no contest.

5. Both consoles used its launch months during holiday season so they wasted that, selling everything they couldp've roduced during a period used to buy products and gifts. In my opinion, launching in March, like Nintendo did with Swith, is way better to have better sales during its first 12 months, because at launch, if you produce 2M, 3M consoles all of them are going to be sold quickly, and then you have the holiday season months after to have another huge amount of sales.

 

So, despite all of this, Switch with its best 1st party lineup ever, is barealy ahead of both PS4 and XBO in USA. It is accepted that the first 20 months of PS4 were poor, with the "PS4 has no games" tagline. At the end of the day, poor PS4 first two years equally the same than best 2 first years of any Nintendo console ever in relation to sales . That's why i think Switch won't come close to Wii in lifetime sales. Wii in the same period just had way more sales than Switch. I won't be surprised if the best years of Switch in the end are cosnidered its two or three first years..., like what happened to N64 and Wii. That's why i think Switch after 2019 wil start a decline in sales (if it doesn't happen already in 2019).

I want to add, that Switch numbers are very good, is just that Switch is considered like something historical in most gaming forums when at the moment still has not been that yet, just saying that.

 

At the end there you do say that Switch numbers are good but I'd classify them as great. It's beating xbox & ps4 which even if you don't find it impressive is still impressive considering where their consoles are now.

 

Switch doesn't even get half the 3Rd party support that those two consoled get so saying that the sales aren't that impressive when Nintendo is doing the majority of these sales off their own back, is just stupid.

I called it "very good", if you prefer the term "great", is fine by me too. And what i said is i find more impressive what PS4 and XBO did than Switch and that Switch is not that impressive as some people say, but that doesn't mean Switch sales are not impressive too. Is just that they're not as impressive as Wii or PS4....in just my humble opinion, nothing stupid in that.



Around the Network
Intrinsic said:
flashfire926 said:

Doesnt matter. Still gonna reach 80 million without a doubt. I'll bet on it. Its tracking ahead of the 3DS by a good margin, and will never fall behind it, so it get to 80M off that alone.

Yes motion control is what sold the wii. However it was pushed by nintendo's games itself. Wii Sports, Wii Fit, Mariokart, Smash Brawl, Galaxy, etc. Wii Sports and Fit in particular, the wii wouldnt have been such a success without them.

Wii U was horribly botched with bad marketing and a confusing name that made it seem like some tablet add-on. It didnt help the casual market migrated to mobile, either.

The difference with the Switch is that we're seeing a unified first party that when are combined, can absolutely do 80 million without a doubt. Keep in mind this is the first home console with mainline pokemon on it, something that will sell north of 15 million copies (we just saw a taste of whats to come with lets go). 

First I will like to thank you for speaking objectively. This is a very touchy subject to most people. 

With the Wii.... yes nintendo made games for it. As they d fr all their platforms. But it sold primarily for motion controls. And primarily to the casual crowd. And alt of companies not just nintendo tried to partake of that crowd.

A troubling thing however is if you look at the overall game output of nintendo platforms. This ca usually be tied directly to how successful they were. eg...

DS had 4000 games. 3DS had 1700.

Wii had  2800 games. WiiU had 367.

To put it into perspective every console that has old upwards of 80M has had more than 1000 games made for it. With the best consoles havin as much as 2500+ games made for it.

This is the basis of my argument as to why i say the NS cannot do this on the back of nintendo software alone. Right now the NS is at round 100 games.

NS is like 1400 games



When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.

zorg1000 said:

NS is like 1400 games

You talking abut games in the store? Or physical releases.

I am talking about physical releases. As that is what VGC tracks.

And as I said before..... digital only (usually indie games) are not sale drivers. They sell t an already existing market base. Those aren't the games you see advertised on TV or plastered across walls at brick and mortar stores.



Intrinsic said:
zorg1000 said:

So you think Switch will only sell as much as 3DS despite handily outperforming it thus far?

Yes. I think it will sell really well for about 3 to 4 years. But then those sales will crash because at that point every major IP would already have an iteration on the switch and any sequel will not move as many consoles. As is the case with every IP ever.

My reasoning is that nintendo IP alone can't drive sales like that. Especially when you consider most of those IPs come in 2019 and 2020. 

The exact same thing could be said for 3DS and it sold an additional ~25 million (~33% of LTD) after year 4.



When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.

Intrinsic said:
zorg1000 said:

NS is like 1400 games

You talking abut games in the store? Or physical releases.

I am talking about physical releases. As that is what VGC tracks.

And as I said before..... digital only (usually indie games) are not sale drivers. They sell t an already existing market base. Those aren't the games you see advertised on TV or plastered across walls at brick and mortar stores.

Well that's a terrible comparison then because a majority of those 2800 Wii & 4000 DS games would be digital only if they released now.



When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.

Around the Network
Intrinsic said:
Agente42 said:

Nintendoom again? Each generation has appropriate rules. The new generation has begun and the Switch already has more than 20 million ahead of Sony and Microsoft. We need know better about the new Sony and Microsoft consoles.

This is not nintend doom. And its unfortunate that if spoken against the viability f the platform, no matter how constructive it wuold be taken as such. I have said before I expect the switch t do well. I expect it to do at least 60M. Thats not doom when that puts it along their best selling consoles.

We already know exactly what the next sony/ms consoles will bring to the table. Its the same thing they have done for the last 4 generations. Same way we know nintendo no longer competes in using that same business model.

You guys have t make up your minds abut the NS, so now you are saying its a 9th gen console and as such already 20M ahead or is it a very late 8th gen console. I was of the impression it was n 8th gen console. 

zorg1000 said:

Right now it is positioned as a home console that can be taken on the go since it costs a similar amount and can handle a decent amount of PS4/XBO games. But what about 3 years from now?

Will it still be marketed that way or will they adapt? Will it have a couple price cuts and revisions and start to be positioned more as a handheld that can hook up to a TV?

Will a hypothetical $199 Switch Mini really be affected by $399-499 home consoles? Were GB/GBA/DS/3DS affected negatively by the far stronger and more expensive home consoles from Sega/Sony/Microsoft?

You question whether or not Switch can reach 80 million but seem to ignore that 3/4 of their handhelds accomplished that while the 4th will only end up a few million short of that mark.

And you hit the nail on the head. Portable home console versus dockable portable console. 

I see it as a jack f all and master of non. Which ultimately I feel will affect it. As a home console, the time is coming that the games people play at home simply will not run on it. And all that will be had are nintendo games. But how may nintendo home consoles have ever sold more than 50M riding primarily on nintendo games? 

As a handheld.... look at the 3DS. There is a reason nintendo sought out to do more with the NS than just make  handheld. They were smart enough to see that in the present day and age its near impossible to be just a handheld device when any $50 7 inch tablet running android can not just do more and more appeal than your hand held. The rise of cheap tablets and super basic games n the app store has pretty much sucked out that super casual crowd nintendo sold their handhelds to primarily.

I guess we will see where it goes.

flashfire926 said:

Yes, the first party games alone can carry this to 80 million. You think ports of Skyrim and Fifa is whats selling the switch? You're mistaken.

Lets be honest here then....... how many nintendo consles (that aren't handhelds) has sold more than up to r more than 80M?

One.

And that one wasn't selling for "the games" it was selling simply for what it was; motion controls and some sort of cultural shift. Evident in what happened with the WiiU when a nintendo home console was asked to sell for nothing but the games.

But lets look at the handhelds.... As i have already explained, the world we live in today is very different from the world where those handhelds sold upwards of 70M. Again evident by what happened with the 3ds.

So yes..... I don't think 3rd party games sell nintendo hardware. And thats my point. I d not believe that nintendo IPs alone will take the console to 80M. Because it never has. Nintendo platforms always sell because they create a market and claim it for themselves. Thats always been their way. Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't. Everytime they have tried competing in the same market with anyone else (or one they didnt pretty much create)they have lost. 

So the real question is that is this hybrid console thin that new market? And how big is it? This is why its hard making comparisons of nintendo platforms and how well they did in the past; they all usually bring something different to the table. But we can compare form factors though. There are really only like 15 to 20M die hard nintendo fans out there. People that will buy a nintendo platform no matter what. Probably a lot less really. Going off the performance of the WiiU. So the NS will sell not because of nintendo games (people just end up buying those after they have bought into whatever new form factor nintendo is pushing) but rather sell on the novelty of its hybrid nature. 

And does anyone here (myself included) really know how big a market that is? 

zorg1000 said:

It baffles me that people still think AAA ports are what determines the success/failure of Nintendo platforms

No... thats not what I a saying at all.

Nintendo won 2? Generations with nes & snes I believe and then with the Wii.



colafitte said:
JSG87 said:

 

At the end there you do say that Switch numbers are good but I'd classify them as great. It's beating xbox & ps4 which even if you don't find it impressive is still impressive considering where their consoles are now.

 

Switch doesn't even get half the 3Rd party support that those two consoled get so saying that the sales aren't that impressive when Nintendo is doing the majority of these sales off their own back, is just stupid.

I called it "very good", if you prefer the term "great", is fine by me too. And what i said is i find more impressive what PS4 and XBO did than Switch and that Switch is not that impressive as some people say, but that doesn't mean Switch sales are not impressive too. Is just that they're not as impressive as Wii or PS4....in just my humble opinion, nothing stupid in that.

 

But I would say they are more impressive than ps4 because of the missing 3Rd party support. Not as impressive as Wii though because that thing was a phenomenon.



zorg1000 said:
Intrinsic said:

You talking abut games in the store? Or physical releases.

I am talking about physical releases. As that is what VGC tracks.

And as I said before..... digital only (usually indie games) are not sale drivers. They sell t an already existing market base. Those aren't the games you see advertised on TV or plastered across walls at brick and mortar stores.

Well that's a terrible comparison then because a majority of those 2800 Wii & 4000 DS games would be digital only if they released now.

Smh.... pls lets not move posts here. I didn't add digital only games to all the other platforms. Can you imagine how big the number for the PS4, PS3, XB1, 360....etc would be like if we added digital games.

Or if we started hypothetically re-releasing games from previus gens now and makin them digital titles too?

This observation is a simple one look at the physical (which are usually the bigger/mainstream titles of their respective gens) and that paints a picture. That applies to every single platform..... nintendo or otherwise.



Intrinsic said:

First I will like to thank you for speaking objectively. This is a very touchy subject to most people. 

With the Wii.... yes nintendo made games for it. As they d fr all their platforms. But it sold primarily for motion controls. And primarily to the casual crowd. And alt of companies not just nintendo tried to partake of that crowd.

A troubling thing however is if you look at the overall game output of nintendo platforms. This ca usually be tied directly to how successful they were. eg...

DS had 4000 games. 3DS had 1700.

Wii had  2800 games. WiiU had 367.

To put it into perspective every console that has old upwards of 80M has had more than 1000 games made for it. With the best consoles havin as much as 2500+ games made for it.

This is the basis of my argument as to why i say the NS cannot do this on the back of nintendo software alone. Right now the NS is at round 100 games.

Your numbers are laughably wrong.

First of all, here are the actual lifetime numbers for physical releases:
https://www.nintendo.co.jp/ir/finance/historical_data/xls/number_of_titles_e1803.xlsx

And here are the number of physical releases after each console has been out for seven fiscal quarters:

DS Japan: 213
DS America: 135
DS Other: 125
Average: 157.7
https://www.nintendo.co.jp/ir/pdf/2006/060724e.pdf

Wii Japan: 169
Wii America: 283
Wii Other: 270
Average: 240.7
https://www.nintendo.co.jp/ir/pdf/2008/080730e.pdf

3DS Japan: 166
3DS America: 146
3DS Other: 157
Average: 156.3
https://www.nintendo.co.jp/ir/pdf/2012/121024e.pdf

Wii U Japan: 58
Wii U America: 99
Wii U Other: 91
Average: 82.7
https://www.nintendo.co.jp/ir/pdf/2014/140730e.pdf

Switch Japan: 172
Switch America: 234
Switch Other: 232
Average: 212.7
https://www.nintendo.co.jp/ir/pdf/2018/181030e.pdf

Switch is second only to Wii despite the explosion of digital games over the last generation.

Also, what happened to arguing that the form factor is what sells the console, not the games?

Intrinsic said: 

So the real question is that is this hybrid console thin that new market? And how big is it? This is why its hard making comparisons of nintendo platforms and how well they did in the past; they all usually bring something different to the table. But we can compare form factors though. There are really only like 15 to 20M die hard nintendo fans out there. People that will buy a nintendo platform no matter what. Probably a lot less really. Going off the performance of the WiiU. So the NS will sell not because of nintendo games (people just end up buying those after they have bought into whatever new form factor nintendo is pushing) but rather sell on the novelty of its hybrid nature. 

According to you, the Switch won't sell because of its Nintendo games, but it will sell based on an arbitrary amount of third party games that it gets over its lifetime. Logic at its finest.


Intrinsic said:
zorg1000 said:

Well that's a terrible comparison then because a majority of those 2800 Wii & 4000 DS games would be digital only if they released now.

Smh.... pls lets not move posts here. I didn't add digital only games to all the other platforms. Can you imagine how big the number for the PS4, PS3, XB1, 360....etc would be like if we added digital games.

Or if we started hypothetically re-releasing games from previus gens now and makin them digital titles too?

This observation is a simple one look at the physical (which are usually the bigger/mainstream titles of their respective gens) and that paints a picture. That applies to every single platform..... nintendo or otherwise.

I dont think your numbers are accurate to begin with.

Wii officially had just over 1200 retail games in North America & DS had about 1800.



When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.