FreeTalkLive said:
Resident_Hazard said: I can't believe some of you are dismissing this game just because AN EASTER EGG THAT IS NOT EVEN REMOTELY PART OF STANDARD GAMEPLAY WAS CUT. That is beyond stupid.
|
You are such a meanie. I am not gonna pick up the game at full price (unless it is priced under $40) now because it was removed. I stand by my choice. |
Well, seriously, this is complaining about an Easter Egg that was never really confirmed to be in the game in the first place--they only thought about maybe doing it. Without the head-tracking gimmick the game is being extremely well received early on with reports from IGN stating that they went back to play it several times at Nintendo's Media Summit--and so did just about everyone else. Mean or not, I stand by my post which essentially stated that it's downright stupid to dismiss this game just because an easter egg--one that the vast majority of people likely wouldn't be able to use anyway--is not implemented into the game.
I'm sure the game will be $50 brand new. It's EA after all with Steven Spielberg of all people in tow. They'll charge full price. I'm not saying they won't give us some serious bang for our buck (again, we have Spielberg here and he likes to spend a hefty buck, but also loves to deliver some serious bang), especially with the reported user-generated content the game has available and likely online mode(s), but it won't be a discount title. I just can't see that. IGN referred to it as one of the best 3rd party titles on the Wii. It'd be stupid to dismiss it because an easter egg few people would even be able to use isn't in the game. Silly.