(Not sure how this thread is going to go)
The best threads are the ones where everyone controls their emotions and at the same time do not criticize a person or person's opinion. Sadly though, many users succumb to at least one of these every now and then.
Even giving back-up to claims for a certain opinion doesn't do any good if the user giving the back-up to the claim is criticizing someone. This has the potential to turn any participant in an argument into a troll no matter how intelligent or self-controlling that individual is. Sad to say I've fallen into that myself a couple of times. The slightest name-calling, fad, or wording in any topic can trigger a flame war.
No matter how right you think you are, it should be a priority to never criticize anyone. If your opinion gets criticized, remember that you should never take it personally.
One thing many users take to a personal extent is the difference between a statement like "Nintendo is a company" and an opinion like "I enjoy racing games more than fighting games". Both of these in their respective literal structures are in their own correct forms. However, that doesn't mean when a person says "Racing games are better than fighting games" is an actual fact. It's in a statement form which in the literary sense is a factual form, but it's still an opinion regardless because it revolves around self preference.
Take me for instance, I love RPG's more than any other genre. Does that make RPG's the best genre if I say "RPG's are better than any other genre"? No, but in my opinion it is and other users should already acknowledge it's an opinion if I happened to say that exact statement.
Now what if someone says "Company A is the greatest developer because....*supplies back-up*" and the back-up is legit, does that make him/her right? Not even close. It's all personal preference. Video games are in the entertainment industry. Because of this, agreement is divided on what is best in each category. The majority of agreement is not enough either because it's still an opinion and opinions cannot be proven even WITH legit facts. There are too many definitions on how to determine the greatest <insert entertainment producer here> that it's impossible to put one above another in a factual stance.
My number 1 rule about an opinion: You can't prove one, but you can agree with one. If a majority agree's with an opinion, it isn't fact because agreement relies too heavily on factors that are not constants. Factors such as where a person lives, how a person grew up, education etc. All of these have an impact on an opinion and if were changed would change the person's opinion.
This will only take a moment of your time. *steals your watch*










