starcraft said:
SpartanFX said: one thing to starcraft:
you keep mentioning metacritics score
but any human with a brain that goes through the metacritics reviews, will see some UNknown websites which reviewed the game,,and there is a high possibility that MS moneyhats those unknown websites to do a bad review for competitors and good reviews for their games(unfortunately it's true ) so their metacritics review means nothing to me .So stop with the metacritics as it does not do justice of how good a game is
I know using their numbers works better for your false claims ,,but it's BS
The only website I accept is IGN and that's it ,,so we can argue about their reviews but not a bunch of website I ve never heard or know if they have even played the game or not.
|
There is just as high a possibility Sony moneyhats those sites. Lets not forget Sony snuck DRM into CD's without telling people, and made laptop batteries that blow up. Don't pretend they are ethically untouchable.
But I just want you to remember forever something you said here. "I know using their numbers works better for your false claims." You just admitted that an aggregate score website works better for the 360 than the PS3. I want you to always remember that. |
There is possibility for sony as well but most of these unkown revie- websites are US based and like 360 better.So they are highly critical of any PS3 game ,,for example,we even have a member here that's a game reviewer (on this website) with extreme bias against PS3(and no I m not gonna name who but most poeple already know),,so PS3 can easily get lower grades for this mater unitll they pass the 360 user base in US.
@ bolded part:
I don't know what you mean ,,but I can see 360 has number of games above 90 in metacritics site I am not blind,,and I am not saying they don't deserve it,,cause I love most of those games my self,,,but PS3 also has some AAA excluisves but due to reason explained those unkown websites have dragged the score lower than 90.