By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Harvest Moon: Light of Hope Special Edition releasing PS4 and Switch in May

DonFerrari said:
JRPGfan said:

Dont think any xbox users are actually sad this isnt heading there way.
Doubt there will be many PS4 or Switch users that get this.

Imo badly made mobile games should stay there, and not get ported to consoles lmao.

It's probable that there are more sad ps4/switch owners about this gaming going to their consoles than X1 owners sad about not getting it.

 

But the remark was just due to people always assuming that if a game isn't on a system it must have been bought out.

I usually see that remark when it's a 3rd party company only releasing said game towards PS4 and nothing else. 



               

Around the Network
Chazore said:
DonFerrari said:

It's probable that there are more sad ps4/switch owners about this gaming going to their consoles than X1 owners sad about not getting it.

 

But the remark was just due to people always assuming that if a game isn't on a system it must have been bought out.

I usually see that remark when it's a 3rd party company only releasing said game towards PS4 and nothing else. 

So you missed the memo that Sony paid Capcom to keep MHW from Switch only, cause of reasons.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

DonFerrari said:
Chazore said:

I usually see that remark when it's a 3rd party company only releasing said game towards PS4 and nothing else. 

So you missed the memo that Sony paid Capcom to keep MHW from Switch only, cause of reasons.

It's on multiple platforms.



               

Chazore said:
DonFerrari said:

So you missed the memo that Sony paid Capcom to keep MHW from Switch only, cause of reasons.

It's on multiple platforms.

Yes it is, but for some reason some Nintendo fans defend that Sony paid for it to be out of Switch, exclusively.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

DonFerrari said:
Chazore said:

It's on multiple platforms.

Yes it is, but for some reason some Nintendo fans defend that Sony paid for it to be out of Switch, exclusively.

Not sure about paying to keep it off, but I can see that they have paid for top treatment above the other platforms it's releasing/released on. 



               

Around the Network
Chazore said:
DonFerrari said:

Yes it is, but for some reason some Nintendo fans defend that Sony paid for it to be out of Switch, exclusively.

Not sure about paying to keep it off, but I can see that they have paid for top treatment above the other platforms it's releasing/released on. 

Not sure what the added benefits were, but sure it's possible that they paid for the Horizon skin or marketing.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

DonFerrari said:

Not sure what the added benefits were, but sure it's possible that they paid for the Horizon skin or marketing.

Beta support, exclusive DLC, marketing rights etc.