I'm going to ask you the same thing, how many much police and military intervention for you to realize that it is a violent system that is sustained through force and coercion?

I find people who say capitalism is flawed should remember so is socialism.

Any system taken to the extreme is flawed and imo the best countries in the world are capitalistic and socialist-minded at the same time.

I don't waste my time listening to socialist blablabla. There's no point in debatinig with people like you. I just call you what you are and there's only 2 options: a complete idiot or a sadistic psychopath.

Moderated ~ CGI

OK, I won't waste my time with you either.

" That doesn't really make capitalism to be at risk." -> "You mean governments that wanted to keep their power gone and intervened???"
You just proved my point.

Revolution happens when society cannot take it anymore, violence becomes a viable solution. When you try to shove issues like inequality or exploitation under the rug like it's nothing, all it says to me is that capitalism can no longer solve these problems so their supporters choose to ignore them. 

I disagree with your premise given the evidence I've provided so I don't think we can go further than this.

I can't tell if you're joking or serious.

All right, I'll bite.

You think that socialism will remove the need for police and military? How would that work, exactly? Under socialism, people will not commit crimes? Countries will no longer struggle against one another for all of the various reasons countries have, throughout all human history?

The police and military are tools of class conflict, in order to keep the class differences. Of course there will still be problems in socialism, we're not looking for a perfect society, we're looking for a better society. Also, socialism is an internationalist movement.

I didn't claim that socialism was perfect. And yeah, VGC is a good example of capitalism, ioi barely ever shows up here yet makes the ad money while the moderators who put a ton of effort into the site don't make a penny.

With respect, you're slinging dogma at me -- not discussing anything real. "Tools of class conflict"? "An internationalist movement"? The actual history of such socialist countries which have existed tells me that there will still be class distinctions within them, and divisions between socialist governments. Every socialist government has had a police force, and made terrible use of them besides. There have been wars between socialist governments, and of course there remains the potential for conflict between socialist governments and non-socialist governments. (Because you describe something as "international" does not mean that the world will conform to your theory; it's a good bet that not everyone on the planet will subscribe to your ideology.)

Look at the history of socialist countries and tell me whether or not they are "better societies." I'd say that the evidence points in the other direction: that socialism destroys economy, liberty and life. And, in general, I'd advise that you read the applicable histories, because you currently speak like someone who is steeped in propaganda but without any understanding of how any of this has worked in practice.