zorg1000 said:
Intrinsic said:
Are you kidding me now?
This was a three way vote. Not a two way vote.
55% PS4
28% NSW
15% XB1.
And somehow the NS was the minority? Only if you decide to pool PS4 and XB1 votes together against the NS, but by that twisted reasoning.... you might as well pool the vots of the PS4=NS of those that thought it would win. Which would give you 80%+....... oh look... still higher than you own pool.
Stop the BS... its a 3 way vote. A contender getting more than half the votes of the winner doesn't make it a minority.
|
Why wouldnt we pool PS4 & XBO in this scenario?
I was replying to you saying some thought Switch would dominate so its not NSW vs PS4 vs XBO, its NSW vs PS4/XBO in this particular case.
Also just because someone thought it would win does not mean they thought it would dominate. If only 25-30% of people thought it would win than you are probably looking at less than 10% saying it would dominate.
So yes your original statement that some thought it would dominate is likely true, it seems weird to single out what a small minority thought.
|
I don't get what or why you feel the need to be doing or saying what you are right now.
I said some people though/expected the switch to dominate. Thats a fact. Which alludes to the switch simply winning NPD . Cause in this case thats what dominating means. You win instead of the other two winning.
28% voted that the NS will win november. Thats also a fact.
28% was not the minority of 3 voting pools. Thats also a fact. That award of minority goes to those saying the XB1 will win.
So i really don't get what the issue is here... have i said something wrong or factually inaccurate? or is it that you just don't like how it sounds?