Acevil said:
I wonder how many of those posts were before this thread was made. I imagine just one, but apparently enough to make this thread. |
I know what im writing in the next media create thread xD
Pocky Lover Boy!

Acevil said:
I wonder how many of those posts were before this thread was made. I imagine just one, but apparently enough to make this thread. |
I know what im writing in the next media create thread xD
Pocky Lover Boy!

| AngryLittleAlchemist said: Lmao I love how Lawlight is saying people need to get moderated for taking this thread off topic... while literally taking this thread off topic by defending Kerotan to the last breath.
We can take the opportunity right now to make everything after this comment on topic. |
Someone has to tell those people what they’re doing. I wouldn’t have to if mods were doing what they were meant to do.
VGPolyglot said:
When his title is in quotations, it is implying that he is referencing a specific post. If the post in question does not exist, then there was no point at all for this prompt. |
Even if he was talking about specific posts, you’re still asking him to go through hundreds of posts. To what end? Who know. What will you do if he links to those posts?
FloatingWaffles said:
And how exactly is my post trolling, apparently? |
Hmm... maybe because you’re attacking on the TC instead of the topicat hand.
Lawlight said:
Hmm... maybe because you’re attacking on the TC instead of the topicat hand. |
I didn't 'attack' anyone first of all. I pointed out that not only is there no discussion to be had on the topic since Kerotan already made up his mind on it before even starting the thread, but also that a topic didn't need to be made about it in the first place and how hypocritical it was considering what Kerotan with his posts about Sony/PS4 but now that there's one that he doesn't like because it goes against Sony/PS4 he decides to make a thread about it? There was absolutely no point. He would be saying the same exact thing if the situation was reversed.
Pointing out something is very different from 'attacking' someone.
Last edited by FloatingWaffles - on 01 December 2017FloatingWaffles said:
I didn't 'attack' anyone first of all. I pointed out that not only is there no discussion to be had on the topic since Kerotan already made up his mind on it before even starting the thread, but also that a topic didn't need to be made about it in the first place and how hypocritical it was considering what Kerotan with his posts about Sony/PS4 but now that there's one that he doesn't like because it goes against Sony/PS4 he decides to make a thread about it? There was absolutely no point. He would be saying the same exact thing if the situation was reversed. Pointing out something is very different from 'attacking' someone. |
He has his opinion and you’re free to say why you disagree. I don’t even one person has done that so far.
Lawlight said:
He has his opinion and you’re free to say why you disagree. I don’t even one person has done that so far. |
Yes he has his own opinion but again he started the thread off with calling anyone who thinks that the Switch is eating PS4's sales as wrong basically by declaring it a 'myth' according to him immediately. Not much of a discussion to have if he already has his foot firmly planted on one side and won't even consider what anyone else says. Again, the thread was basically just "agree with me or you're wrong" from the beginning.
Lawlight said:
Even if he was talking about specific posts, you’re still asking him to go through hundreds of posts. To what end? Who know. What will you do if he links to those posts? |
You're saying that is if it's unreasonable for me to ask for proof, yet he keeps on saying "some people" without saying who he's even talking about, or which posts he is. So, I don't even know if he is talking about real people or just strawmen.
Jranation said:
I wonder why..... Maybe cause it doesn't break any rules or standards? |
Personally I'd call it spam and the mods did say they'd crack down on posts like the ones you make but looks like they never followed through.
Why do you wrote such short pointless posts? Are you trying to increase your post count or something?
FloatingWaffles said:
Yes he has his own opinion but again he started the thread off with calling anyone who thinks that the Switch is eating PS4's sales as wrong basically by declaring it a 'myth' according to him immediately. Not much of a discussion to have if he already has his foot firmly planted on one side and won't even consider what anyone else says. Again, the thread was basically just "agree with me or you're wrong" from the beginning. |
Seriously though nobody who disagrees has even tackled the point I made. Miyamotto is the best example. The spin doctor himself. He pretends he's already addressed it and then waffles on about something else just to avoid the point.
VGPolyglot said:
You're saying that is if it's unreasonable for me to ask for proof, yet he keeps on saying "some people" without saying who he's even talking about, or which posts he is. So, I don't even know if he is talking about real people or just strawmen. |
Okay, so the level of discourse in this entire topic has been atrocious. You asked for a fair amount of evidence that has been frequently refused.
I could just say something like "It's pretty clear that the Switch has the potential of cannibalizing Sony sales. If you disagree, I look forward to your numbers that prove otherwise (since the burden of proof isnt on the person making the claim, right)." That's nonsense. How can you talk to that kind of statement?
If we want a higher level is discussion that isn't based on strawmen and vagaries, I'll help you out. I went through the MC thread looking at all of the cannibalism related pieces of discussion that happened before Kerotan started this echo chamber. Even if it didn't say the word 'cannibal,' but seemed kind of related, I posted it below:
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8642332 -> mentions Switch taking share from PS4 (no cannibal)
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8642366 -> mentions Switch vs PS4 (no cannibal)
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8642395 -> ASKS whether Switch will start cannibalising PS4 as a point of discussion (yes cannibal)
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8642438 -> reiterates the question, with a personal conclusion (implied cannibal)
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8642452 -> Kerotan post about PS4 (no cannibal)
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8642481 -> replies to the question about cannibalism (yes cannibal)
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8642696 -> Kerotan replies to the post about cannibalism calling it a 'myth' (yes cannibal)
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8642739 -> replies to Kerotan and says the Switch is eating everyone's lunch (no cannibal)
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8642955 -> replies to Kerotan (yes cannibal)
Three people (including Kerotan) used this word before the thread was created.
Three.
Three does not make a myth. And one of them came in here and retracted the statement.