Here is your bone, the American Recovery and Reinvestment act.  Not sure what thought process you are talking about.  You said getting rid of regulations was a good thing but then buckle when trying to support your stance.  I guess if you cannot support your opinion then it best to just ignore it.  I get it, its an old tactic.  Now I have answered your question lets continue.  When you are ready to provide your opinion on this post, lets see how much actual research you do within your answer or will you just throw another excuse on the pile and deflect.

I totally agree that economic debates are pointless until we have more data.  Saying something will be this or that especially for macroeconomics which sometimes takes years to see the results is hard to predict.  If you look at the Housing market before the bubble burst and all hell broke loose, things were running hot.  As I have mentioned we will see how things shake up within the next few years.  Things always need to bake first before we see the true results.  Anyway, at the moment I look on these things with interest.  

I think almost everything Trump has done within his term of office until now was bad. He separates the world and is the perfect representation of egoism in this world.

I'd even say he is even a worse president than I expected him to be during the election time.

Haha thats rich. Your projection is on another level dude! It’s almost impressive how unaware you are. When have I not supported my stance? I didn’t reply to your “boohoo California” and personal insult bullshit? I don’t give a crap about California. California’s problems are California’s fault. I said the degregulation was good for the economy and told you how. Showed you how it was effective immediately. It took you 25 posts to answer the question and even then it’s just a name. No thought, no consequence, you probably just pulled it from some cnn article after a quick google. I would be happy to shit on that for you later. “Another excuse and deflection” lmao. I wouldn’t steal your thunder bro.

Love that movie.

Midterms. 

There is a democrat senator running for reelection in Montana I believe (probably gonna lose there). Every president ever has done this. George Bush came to my town in 2008 for midterms. What Trump is doing is normal for any president.

So wait, you complain about Trump not acting like a 'president' (which is wrong in itself because their is no universal standard to acting like a normal president), and then when he does something most presidents tend to do, you complain?

Im not saying you HAVE to like the guy, but come on now. Stuff like this will win him reelection.

As for your last question I don't care and it has nothing to do with what you brought up previously

You're calling him out for something so pathetic and something most presidents do. I'm surprised at the rate you go that you haven't called him out for breathing and contaminating the air that the poor children inhale too.

I call Trump out when he actually does something WRONG, not when he does what typical presidents do and promote senators in midterms. If you feel it is injust for him to rally for senators of the same party, that level of sheer wrongness WILL win elections for him, because it comes off as the other side shouldn't be allowed to voice an opinion, which is textbook fascism (and trust me, I don't like to throw this term willy nilly). Am I saying you are one? No, but Trump is doing what Obama literally did for Hillary 2 years ago, so the fact that Trump is evil for it comes off as hypocrisy and a willful distaste for the other side.

Most of these rallies are to stay close to his base and not alienate himself in Washington, which is a smart move. FDR addressed the media through fireside chats over the radio, and while I dislike FDR, this was great and genius. Many people thought the same way you did about Trump in that he was wasting time and could be doing much more, when in reality it made him more relatable to the general public and showed he makes efforts to connect to the public. I honestly think presidents should do this in the future to show they are still tide and true to the people that got them there.

And as such, since he's around everyday joes, he uses exaggerated terminology. If you have ever used exaggerated terminology (which all of us have), I fail to see how one can pass judgement on it when they have performed the exact same actions they criticize. He's talking to the everyday folk, not the UN council.