By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Donald Trump: How Do You Feel about Him Now? (Poll)

 

Last November,

I supported him and I still do - Americas 91 15.77%
 
I supported him and I now don't - Americas 16 2.77%
 
I supported him and I still do - Europe 37 6.41%
 
I supported him and I now don't - Europe 7 1.21%
 
I supported him and I still do - Asia 6 1.04%
 
I supported him and I now don't - Asia 1 0.17%
 
I supported him and I still do - RoW 15 2.60%
 
I supported him and I now don't - RoW 2 0.35%
 
I didn't support him and still don't. 373 64.64%
 
I didn't support him and now do. 29 5.03%
 
Total:577
SpokenTruth said:
massimus said:

Like what can you give an example? That sounds like some bullshit. What costs are involved in shutting down and reopening the government? I know about the retroactive pay which is some bullshit honestly. Only in the public sector would that happen. Still though, it doesn’t cost money to retroactively pay someone. They were going to get paid that anyway. Losing revenue on the parks is not a cost and I doubt it’s significant.

It does sound odd, I don’t believe it. If it is indeed true then it shows how bloated and worthless the federal government is. It is a tool, that’s what happens when you independent equal branches. It’s one of the few beauties left in our system. 

The back pay isn't a cost but it's to show that you aren't saving money either.

As for shutdown and restart up costs, that's huge.  Imagine you had a $4 trillion company and within 2 weeks had to prepare for a shut down and 2 weeks later had to spin it all back up again.  Granted, not everything shuts down, but you get my point.  The overtime, extra processing, expeditions, etc...add up to a lot.  And the shutting down of national parks is no small dollar. And the costs of bringing everything back up again.

https://www.newsweek.com/heres-how-much-government-shutdown-could-cost-786073

"The last shut down caused 800,000 federal employees to be placed on furlough and many more employees were late on receiving their paychecks. Those furloughed federal employees then spent less and their shopping dropped by 7 percent.

During that time, the Office of Management and Budget estimated that the shutdown cost Americans $2 billion in lost productivity. The shutdown also impacted tourism by forcing National Parks to close, costing $500 million in lost revenue, according to Fortune

The government shutdown this year could impede defense department contracts leading to an increase in weapons costs, according to Reuters."

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-42779948

"In 2013, the combination of indirect and direct costs amounted to as much as 0.6% of quarterly GDP or $24bn, according to some analyses."

 

https://www.npr.org/2018/01/21/579584199/the-economic-impact-of-a-government-shutdown

"The economists who add this up say it works out to about $2 billion a day in lost output to the economy every day the shutdown persists."

 

Just Google it.  Even Fox News will tell you they cost more money to shutdown than to keep operating.  Still sound like bullshit?

I have not checked all the links but the ones I looked at did not say anything about cost. Paying the 2 billion in retroactive pay for no work performed is not a cost. They shouldn’t be paid for doing no work, it’s that simple. “The furloughed workers not spending money” isn’t a cost. The public perception on public markets is not a cost. Yes I still think it’s bullshit, reaching bullshit.



Around the Network
massimus said:

No republicans always get blamed for shutdowns. Obama did the same thing trump said he would do and it was the republicans fault. Now it’s trumps fault. My point is that it’s nobodys fault. When the branches are at odds it shuts down, that’s the American system. It’s not dumb. McConnell like the spineless hack he is, is waiting until after the midterms to hold the vote. He is scared, he’s a typical RINO pushover. Say good things during the election and then reverse rule in DC. Trump is trying call out these people before the midterms, he said let’s have the vote now and let the people know which pussy republicans we need to replace. I think that’s great, he’s not as dumb as you think he is. The Republican Party needs a kick in its ass and a steel beam to support their jelly backs.

 

He won the states. If all of the illegal aliens were contained in NY and California then your popular vote point would be relevant. He does have the support. I think it’s fairly obvious with his approval numbers. Since when did the losing half of the country get consessions? Half of the country and not a single republican voted for Obamacare yet here we are. How is that any different?

 

He isn’t not going to get any votes from democrats regardless. They haven’t won yet, he doesn’t have to do anything. He needs to be more worried about the do-nothing republicans.

 

Im not reaching, it’s obvious. 26 states sued Obama because he was bussing in immigrants to there states and dumping them there. Did you just ignore the border crisis that happened? Did you ignore all of the obnoxious shit Trump was saying during the primary? How he mopped the floor with pro amnesty people like Jen bush? He ran on borders and he won because he was the only one addressing the border. Immigration, economy and SCOTUS picks are why he won the presidency. There aren’t enough “trump can do no wrong” fanatics to get him elected. I don’t have any stats other than polls but I think it’s  fairly obvious what people mean about immigration. You have a border or you don’t, you protect the border or you don’t. Trump won with divisive rhetoric, it’s not reaching. Obama didn’t protect the border ops of course they loved him.

 

Its Dumb to go on Twitter and demand that Dems give him what he wants or he will shutdown the government.  You keep talking about the Republican party but its not the Republican party he is making his demands to its the Dems.  Actually, I cannot even follow your argument because no where is the President throwing any Republican under the bus for his wall.  So you are saying this is some grand scheme by Trump to put pressure on McConnell to fund his wall when they already have a bill to do so.  

It's dumb to believe that this will motivate the Dems to do anything when the political risk for them is negligible at best.  You still have not given one point where this is a good thing for Trump.  How is a government shutdown going to move any Dems to fund his wall.  Why would they even budge if there is no political risk for them and if anything might end up being a win.  So if the Dems come out on top of this whole ploy are you telling me that this was the grand plan Trump envisioned and suddenly everything he wants to pass will come to fruition with a Congress more blue then red.  If this is what you are saying then I am more than willing to see how this plays out and proven wrong that Trump is smarter than my view of him.

Yes, Trump won the states, lets see how that shakes out during the midterms.  You act as if that win currently is the same good feelings still present today.  I personally have no clue so will claim nothing at this point but one thing is for sure, there is still a large divide in people opinion of him.

Your third paragraph doesn't make sense with your previous arguments.  If he doesn't need the Dems then why cry wolf talking about a shutdown if they do not support his wall.  Evidently he does need the Dems or we would not even be having this conversation. If he nuke the Republican party and they lose seats how exactly will that help his cause.  I am truly not understanding your logic on this one.

You are right, that Trump won the Republican primary and killed it and he definitely won over Hillary but then again it was Hillary.  Obama won over her and I am sure Bernie probably would have as well if he toned the socialistic aspect of his platform a tad and wasn't obstructed by the DNC.  Not sure who will be there for the Dems when we get to go through this all again but it should be interesting to see if your border issue is as you predict.



Machiavellian said:

Its Dumb to go on Twitter and demand that Dems give him what he wants or he will shutdown the government.  You keep talking about the Republican party but its not the Republican party he is making his demands to its the Dems.  Actually, I cannot even follow your argument because no where is the President throwing any Republican under the bus for his wall.  So you are saying this is some grand scheme by Trump to put pressure on McConnell to fund his wall when they already have a bill to do so.  

He doesn't cower in the corner like Mcconnell. Talk big during elections and then do nothing. He was not making demands of the democrats. They are only loudmouth jerks at this point, powerless. He was talking to the people in charge, the people that send the bills to his desk. The republicans in congress need to do the negotiating. He was saying that if it's not in the bill he will keep vetoing it, essentially. If the republicans don't cave like they do to democrats then he will allow the shutdown. I think he has walked it back some because the cowards he likes were begging for cover during the midterm. Let's flip the coin though right? Lets vote on it. Let's get people engaged on the top priority of our country before our midterm. Let's see what the vast majority looks like.

Maybe, it's dumb to go on twitter in general. How many careers have ended because somebody said some dumb shit when they were fucked up? Like the guardians of the galaxy director getting fired for 10 year old tweets or whatever.  The actors just signed a public note telling people to get a fucking life essentially. Culture twitter politics is Trumps battlegrounds, for better or worse. He slings shit with the trolls. That's why they shadow ban him and try to sue him because he blocked people on his personal account. People have been trying to eat him since the beginning and he's mopping the floor with them. It's why they are so outraged, he's immune to their bullshit. It doesn't work on him. That's the humor in it to me.

 


It's dumb to believe that this will motivate the Dems to do anything when the political risk for them is negligible at best.  You still have not given one point where this is a good thing for Trump.  How is a government shutdown going to move any Dems to fund his wall.  Why would they even budge if there is no political risk for them and if anything might end up being a win.  So if the Dems come out on top of this whole ploy are you telling me that this was the grand plan Trump envisioned and suddenly everything he wants to pass will come to fruition with a Congress more blue then red.  If this is what you are saying then I am more than willing to see how this plays out and proven wrong that Trump is smarter than my view of him.

It's dumb trying to find a reason to motivate democrats. Trump might be running again. "Hey I tried to fix it, your congress sucks." He could do some executive orders but the next democrat will just wipe it out. It's not substantial. A government shutdown won't move any dems to funding, the dems are hoping for a shutdown because they generally win public appeal during these things. It's not 2013, the landscape is much different. I'm not saying that at all. That is nothing close to what i'm saying. The dems can kick rocks for all I care.
 

Yes, Trump won the states, lets see how that shakes out during the midterms.  You act as if that win currently is the same good feelings still present today.  I personally have no clue so will claim nothing at this point but one thing is for sure, there is still a large divide in people opinion of him.

I know anywhere he goes the rallies are flooded out the door. His popularity has not changed for worse since he got elected. I don't think the divide is as big as you think it is. Some border states forgo their responsibility and it affects everyone.
 

Your third paragraph doesn't make sense with your previous arguments.  If he doesn't need the Dems then why cry wolf talking about a shutdown if they do not support his wall.  Evidently he does need the Dems or we would not even be having this conversation. If he nuke the Republican party and they lose seats how exactly will that help his cause.  I am truly not understanding your logic on this one.

If they republican party loses a seat on this issue then they deserve it. In my opinion this is the most certain way to win.

You are right, that Trump won the Republican primary and killed it and he definitely won over Hillary but then again it was Hillary.  Obama won over her and I am sure Bernie probably would have as well if he toned the socialistic aspect of his platform a tad and wasn't obstructed by the DNC.  Not sure who will be there for the Dems when we get to go through this all again but it should be interesting to see if your border issue is as you predict.

The super delegate system in the democratic party is a joke, their votes are worthless. Not that it matters they are all a carbon copy of each other. Trump would have smoked Bernie even worse than Clinton imo. Clinton at least pretended to be a free trader, she was still fooling the grey democrats.

 



SpokenTruth said:
massimus said:

I have not checked all the links but the ones I looked at did not say anything about cost. Paying the 2 billion in retroactive pay for no work performed is not a cost. They shouldn’t be paid for doing no work, it’s that simple. “The furloughed workers not spending money” isn’t a cost. The public perception on public markets is not a cost. Yes I still think it’s bullshit, reaching bullshit.

You said you didn't read the links and your response further shows it.  Please, read them.  Takes a few minutes and you'll fully understand.   A quick point, the $2 billion is not back pay to furloughed government employees.  Just....read them.

I read the “according to some sources” link from the Senate report. I don’t care what NPR or Newsweek has to say. There is not a single cost in the link I read. The estimated 2 billion for furloughed workers is in your link dude. Look at the “according to some sources link” and look under negatively impacts jobs section. Furloughed workers not spending money is not a cost. I would copy and paste it but I can’t on my phone. You can’t use a 2013 shutdown to make your point either. The gdp wasn’t 4.1 in 2013, the jobs market doesnt look how it did in 2013. Saying that it will negatively impact markets based on that is disingenuous. Even if it did impact markets like it did in 2013, it still wouldn’t be a cost. That’s just Newsweek babble. If you can find a cost in that senate report then please, point it out.



SpokenTruth said:
massimus said:

I read the “according to some sources” link from the Senate report. I don’t care what NPR or Newsweek has to say. There is not a single cost in the link I read. The estimated 2 billion for furloughed workers is in your link dude. Look at the “according to some sources link” and look under negatively impacts jobs section. Furloughed workers not spending money is not a cost. I would copy and paste it but I can’t on my phone. You can’t use a 2013 shutdown to make your point either. The gdp wasn’t 4.1 in 2013, the jobs market doesnt look how it did in 2013. Saying that it will negatively impact markets based on that is disingenuous. Even if it did impact markets like it did in 2013, it still wouldn’t be a cost. That’s just Newsweek babble. If you can find a cost in that senate report then please, point it out.

So you read the reports from the Joint Economic Committee, the Office of Management and Budget and saw the associated reports from Standard and Poor's, Goldman Sachs and Moody's....and you're just going to call them liars?

Also, GDP growth during the quarter for the 2013 shutdown was 3.9%.  But that's completely irrelevant because..."the Joint Economic Committee said the combination of indirect and direct costs amounted to as much as 0.6% of quarterly GDP or $24 billion" for the 2013 shutdown.

No I have not. I won’t call them liars until I read it. If the have claimed that a government shutdown costs the government 24 billion dollars and use the same excuses as that senate report then yes. They are fabrications.

 

Where did you get that number from lmao? Try 1.8%... Obama never hit 3.9% growth, not even close. That’s not a cost on the government, that was a loss in the markets due to public perception. It’s not a cost it’s a consequence. The situation is a lot different than it was in 2013. There is no reason to think the same thing will happen. 



Around the Network
SpokenTruth said:
massimus said:

No I have not. I won’t call them liars until I read it. If the have claimed that a government shutdown costs the government 24 billion dollars and use the same excuses as that senate report then yes. They are fabrications.

 

Where did you get that number from lmao? Try 1.8%... Obama never hit 3.9% growth, not even close. That’s not a cost on the government, that was a loss in the markets due to public perception. It’s not a cost it’s a consequence. The situation is a lot different than it was in 2013. There is no reason to think the same thing will happen. 

I think you are confusing annual GDP growth with quarterly growth.  This 4.1% Trump figure you keep reading about it a quarterly figure, not annual.  And yes, the economy did growth at 3.9% in Q4 of 2013.  In fact, the economy hit over 4% four times under Obama.  5.1% Q2 2014, 4.9% Q3 2014, 4.7% Q4 2011 and 4.5% Q4 2009.

You’re right. If the annual GDP was 1.8 then that 4% quarterly doesn’t mean shit though. What was the annual gdp for those years? It was in the negatives in 2009 I believe lol. Growth from -2% isn’t hard.  And the job market was ass back then.  My point is that using the 2013 shutdown as evidence of cost doesn’t even work for what you are trying to say, market losses and whatnot. A loss in revenue is not a cost. Let alone the real cost of it which is nothing. 

This article says Q4 2013 was only 2.6.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/samanthasharf/2014/06/25/u-s-gdp-dropped-2-9-in-the-first-quarter-2014-sharply-lower-from-second-estimate/amp/

Last edited by massimus - on 02 August 2018

massimus said:

He doesn't cower in the corner like Mcconnell. Talk big during elections and then do nothing. He was not making demands of the democrats. They are only loudmouth jerks at this point, powerless. He was talking to the people in charge, the people that send the bills to his desk. The republicans in congress need to do the negotiating. He was saying that if it's not in the bill he will keep vetoing it, essentially. If the republicans don't cave like they do to democrats then he will allow the shutdown. I think he has walked it back some because the cowards he likes were begging for cover during the midterm. Let's flip the coin though right? Lets vote on it. Let's get people engaged on the top priority of our country before our midterm. Let's see what the vast majority looks like.

This does not make any sense.  How exactly is the Republican party going to make the Dems vote on anything which gives them absolutely nothing.  Only the President can bring them to the table and since he is too busy trying to bully them, they will do absolutely nothing.  A shutdown does not benefit him or the Republicans so why would any Dem even entertain any bill with the wall in it.  The Dems can easily wait that out and they do not have to make any moves because the wall isn't even something big among Republicans constitutes.  You have provided absolutely nothing that make this some grand enlightenment plan but if you are going to auto approve every Trump action I guess you have to believe.

Maybe, it's dumb to go on twitter in general. How many careers have ended because somebody said some dumb shit when they were fucked up? Like the guardians of the galaxy director getting fired for 10 year old tweets or whatever.  The actors just signed a public note telling people to get a fucking life essentially. Culture twitter politics is Trumps battlegrounds, for better or worse. He slings shit with the trolls. That's why they shadow ban him and try to sue him because he blocked people on his personal account. People have been trying to eat him since the beginning and he's mopping the floor with them. It's why they are so outraged, he's immune to their bullshit. It doesn't work on him. That's the humor in it to me.

I do not know about that mopping the floor part, lets just agree to disagree.  If anything he will continue to say stupid stuff until he cannot pull something back and just like a lot of people who put permanent thoughts for the public to see without a filter, its only a matter of time before it become a real problem.  Social media is not his friend.

It's dumb trying to find a reason to motivate democrats. Trump might be running again. "Hey I tried to fix it, your congress sucks." He could do some executive orders but the next democrat will just wipe it out. It's not substantial. A government shutdown won't move any dems to funding, the dems are hoping for a shutdown because they generally win public appeal during these things. It's not 2013, the landscape is much different. I'm not saying that at all. That is nothing close to what i'm saying. The dems can kick rocks for all I care.

You know that "I tried to fix it but congress sucks"  did not work for Obama so I doubt its going to work for him.  When all is said and done, results matter not excuses.  The Dems will kick the rock, because it worked for the Republicans and it will work for them.  If they gain more seats you can believe it will be stalling city in Congress and if they gain control well you have another situation like Obama had.  The chance to get things auto signed by his party was now, doing anything to disrupt that is politically stupid.   

I know anywhere he goes the rallies are flooded out the door. His popularity has not changed for worse since he got elected. I don't think the divide is as big as you think it is. Some border states forgo their responsibility and it affects everyone.

You are right his rallies are good, but lets see if that still translate to results at the Polls.  I believe a lot of people did not vote when it was Hillary.  Lets see if the results will be the same after 4 years in office and a new candidate to contend with.

If they republican party loses a seat on this issue then they deserve it. In my opinion this is the most certain way to win.

Only thing to say to this is lets see.  I do not believe the outcome you believe will happen.  We will see if this is a smart move.

The super delegate system in the democratic party is a joke, their votes are worthless. Not that it matters they are all a carbon copy of each other. Trump would have smoked Bernie even worse than Clinton imo. Clinton at least pretended to be a free trader, she was still fooling the grey democrats.

No doubt that system is rigged to put in the person who does the most favors as a candidate.  Still surprised that Obama was able to win against Hillary the first time with this system.  Must be a lot of hate for H but then again Bernie burned a lot of bridges which cost him a lot.  I do not believe he understood how the system worked since he really wasn't part of the DNC.

 

Last edited by Machiavellian - on 06 August 2018

I wonder what evidence that Mueller has on Trump for him to admit that the tower meeting was not about adoption but instead getting dirt on Hillary. To be honest, he is probably right that anyone would take the meeting, the problem is that he already lied about what it was. Not only did he lie about it but he doctored Trump Jr lie about the meeting. I guess he and his lawyers want to get ahead of the whole thing so they can dictate the narrative but that is going to be hard when you are shone to lie about anything and everything until you are proven a liar. Also, didn't Trump Jr lie during a grand jury, if so there could be criminal charges in the wind. Not sure how Trump is going to handle that. Giving a pardon to your son for basically lying for you looks bad no matter how you slice it.



Just an occasional reminder that supporting trump in spite of - or more damningly, because of - all the things he's said and done makes you a terrible person. You're endorsing bigotry, classism, hatred, sexism, and pretty much everything else short of genocide. Not only does Trump consistently do whatever he wants regardless of what the nation wants or needs, but he's actively making America look bad, he's inciting wars with other nations, he's being remarkably immature, and he's being stunningly stupid when he does it. He doesn't seem to care about anyone but himself, he floats from one lie or misrepresentation to the next without a care in the world, he is provably wrong more often than he's right, he's full of hate, and I'm shocked that anyone with a heart could support him or his party.

Supporting Trump now, after all he's said and done and all the things he and his party have done to ruin the US's international relations, is akin to flying a confederate flag. you're outing yourself as racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, bigoted, and above all else, ignorant.

If you can't see just how bad he is for the US, then either you're blind, don't care, or actively want this to happen. No matter the case, if you support trump, you are a bad person either by willful ignorance or deliberate bigotry.



He is actually being a bigger failure than I thought. And I had very low expectations of him and really didn't think he would be elected.

The damage he is doing to Science, Environment, Climate, Health Care, Education, the Economy, Trade, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties, and the dangers he is putting in the USA court systems is going to take many years to undo.

I'm baffled when people still support him, but then there is Fox News and people believing the world is Flat and Evolution is just something Satin make up to trick non believers and then I feel sad.

It’s very strange, the few people I have met that support him have all been immigrates. They speak English with accents and do not look like the typical US Citizen. They tell me they like how he treats immigrants (keep them out) and doesn’t want the USA to be like Europe (with it’s good health care and all.) When I remind them they are immigrants they get quiet and say they never thought of that.



 

Really not sure I see any point of Consol over PC's since Kinect, Wii and other alternative ways to play have been abandoned. 

Top 50 'most fun' game list coming soon!

 

Tell me a funny joke!