p0isonparadise said: Anything less than a 95 would be a disaster. |
Yea, it will be worst 3D Mario ever if it gets 94 for instance. :D
p0isonparadise said: Anything less than a 95 would be a disaster. |
Yea, it will be worst 3D Mario ever if it gets 94 for instance. :D
p0isonparadise said: Anything less than a 95 would be a disaster. |
I would even say that a 95 would cause people to lose their minds.For some reason,scores are really important in this day and age.
Lonely_Dolphin said:
It's sad that a score different than what the hivemind thinks is automatically deemed a troll. The review itself should also be taken into account, and if they bring up valid points on why they scored the game the way they did, then it's just an honest opinion that happens to be unpopular. |
No one is forcing them to love the game, just to judge it honestly and objectively, not based on personal preference.
Edit: Didn't explain enough. Fixed it.
And do you really think 104/108 reviewers gave a game 90+ metascore, just because they're a hivemind?
Shaunodon said:
No one is forcing them to love the game, just to judge it honestly. |
Where did I say anything about being forced to love a game?
Hmm maybe I won't watch any video reviews yet or maybe one, decisions decisions.
Sunstrider said: Hmm maybe I won't watch any video reviews yet or maybe one, decisions decisions. |
If you watch one, you'll feel tempted to watch more.
Lonely_Dolphin said:
Where did I say anything about being forced to love a game? |
I edited my original reply for clarity before.
Wright said:
If you watch one, you'll feel tempted to watch more. |
Yeah, that's what I'm worried about.
Shaunodon said:
I edited my original reply for clarity before. |
And my question still remains.
Hivemind was just my cute way of saying majority.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.