By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Sony's motion sensing controller "Waggle"

As it was said in the Neo Gaf forum

"Sony needs to just focus on perfecting six-axis tilt functionality and leave the rest to Nintendo."

Those are my thoughts exactly.

Realistically there are no features that the wii possesses that Sony would want. But Nintendo does have the consumers as far as % goes.

So if either Sony or Microsoft did anything in the territory of "waggle" it would be nothing more than a stunt or a gimmick.

But as the wii has shown us, that is all it really takes.

....yeah, I went there.



̶3̶R̶D̶   2ND! Place has never been so sweet.


Around the Network
ultraslick said:
As it was said in the Neo Gaf forum

"Sony needs to just focus on perfecting six-axis tilt functionality and leave the rest to Nintendo."

Those are my thoughts exactly.

Realistically there are no features that the wii possesses that Sony would want. But Nintendo does have the consumers as far as % goes.

So if either Sony or Microsoft did anything in the territory of "waggle" it would be nothing more than a stunt or a gimmick.

But as the wii has shown us, that is all it really takes.

....yeah, I went there.

Because price, games, and public perception have absolutely nothing to do with it, and all it really takes to succeed is to have a gimmick.

 

Not only that, but to sell the most software worldwide, you only need create games for your gimmick console, the quality of said games doensn't matter, because all it takes is the gimmick.

 

 

Lemme tell you something bro. If the PS3 could perform ALCHEMY, it still woulda lost to the Wii, starting at 5 hundred and 99 United States Mint Crisp US dollars.

 

A gimmick is one thing. 650 after tax bucks with narn games in the box is an entirely different thing alltogether. I think you'll agree, after further deliberation.

 

...and it's not like we all went over to our friends house and saw them playing all those awesome PS3 launch titles, and said "You know, at 715 dollars, I gotta buy me a PS3 and...whatever game they were playing." Nosir. Word of mouth was not with the PS3, and it still isn't, even thought the word of mouth at this point, if finally not blatantly defaming the PS3, like it was all of last year.

 

 



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.

ZenfoldorVGI said:
ultraslick said:
As it was said in the Neo Gaf forum

"Sony needs to just focus on perfecting six-axis tilt functionality and leave the rest to Nintendo."

Those are my thoughts exactly.

Realistically there are no features that the wii possesses that Sony would want. But Nintendo does have the consumers as far as % goes.

So if either Sony or Microsoft did anything in the territory of "waggle" it would be nothing more than a stunt or a gimmick.

But as the wii has shown us, that is all it really takes.

....yeah, I went there.

Because price, games, and public perception have absolutely nothing to do with it, and all it really takes to succeed is to have a gimmick.

 

Not only that, but to sell the most software worldwide, you only need create games for your gimmick console, the quality of said games doensn't matter, because all it takes is the gimmick.

 

 

Lemme tell you something bro. If the PS3 could perform ALCHEMY, it still woulda lost to the Wii, starting at 5 hundred and 99 United States Mint Crisp US dollars.

 

A gimmick is one thing. 650 after tax bucks with narn games in the box is an entirely different thing alltogether. I think you'll agree, after further deliberation.

 

...and it's not like we all went over to our friends house and saw them playing all those awesome PS3 launch titles, and said "You know, at 715 dollars, I gotta buy me a PS3 and...whatever game they were playing." Nosir. Word of mouth was not with the PS3, and it still isn't, even thought the word of mouth at this point, if finally not blatantly defaming the PS3, like it was all of last year.


 I agree with everything you said. Almost

Wii play and wii sports and mario party and other party games do Exist. The wii was and is marketed and supplied beatifully.

The only thing I disagree with is the way you say " it still woulda lost to the Wii" in the past tense.

But I am sure you are referring to the way the PS3 lost in sales compared to the wii at launch. Which is fine.

I understand that the word gimmick imples a negative short term scheme, but why does it have to.

Can there be such a thing as a great gimmick? One that sells regardless of how well it is actually implemented on a large scale basis. One that has robbed the great Nintendo franchises from becoming anything more than what they were in the last generation. Boy I would  love to play the best selling SSBB for the wii, but I already played melee years ago. I would love to play SMG, but they put mario on rails!!, sweet.

You said: 

"Lemme tell you something bro. If the PS3 could perform ALCHEMY, it still woulda lost to the Wii, starting at 5 hundred and 99 United States Mint Crisp US dollars."  ( I love that mint crisp sentence by the way!)

I agree with you there. But doesn't that make you sad. Always knowing that video games cannot become more than what they always have been. And thanks largely in part to the successfull wii.... always will be.

I will always want to buy the ferrari in life. But What incentive will Sony have to make the PS4 a ferrari, just as they did for the PS3?   None.   Thank you Wii.



̶3̶R̶D̶   2ND! Place has never been so sweet.


i think this 'waggle' is just a codename. Simply because it sounds too stupid and childish (sry my opinion) to be true. If it will be a succes that will depend completely on the games attached and using the 'waggle'. And of course the price tag. 60 euro for a wii mote+nunchuck is already quite some money. what will they charge for this gimmick?



ultraslick said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
ultraslick said:
As it was said in the Neo Gaf forum

"Sony needs to just focus on perfecting six-axis tilt functionality and leave the rest to Nintendo."

Those are my thoughts exactly.

Realistically there are no features that the wii possesses that Sony would want. But Nintendo does have the consumers as far as % goes.

So if either Sony or Microsoft did anything in the territory of "waggle" it would be nothing more than a stunt or a gimmick.

But as the wii has shown us, that is all it really takes.

....yeah, I went there.

Because price, games, and public perception have absolutely nothing to do with it, and all it really takes to succeed is to have a gimmick.

 

Not only that, but to sell the most software worldwide, you only need create games for your gimmick console, the quality of said games doensn't matter, because all it takes is the gimmick.

 

 

Lemme tell you something bro. If the PS3 could perform ALCHEMY, it still woulda lost to the Wii, starting at 5 hundred and 99 United States Mint Crisp US dollars.

 

A gimmick is one thing. 650 after tax bucks with narn games in the box is an entirely different thing alltogether. I think you'll agree, after further deliberation.

 

...and it's not like we all went over to our friends house and saw them playing all those awesome PS3 launch titles, and said "You know, at 715 dollars, I gotta buy me a PS3 and...whatever game they were playing." Nosir. Word of mouth was not with the PS3, and it still isn't, even thought the word of mouth at this point, if finally not blatantly defaming the PS3, like it was all of last year.


 I agree with everything you said. Almost

Wii play and wii sports and mario party and other party games do Exist. The wii was and is marketed and supplied beatifully.

The only thing I disagree with is the way you say " it still woulda lost to the Wii" in the past tense.

But I am sure you are referring to the way the PS3 lost in sales compared to the wii at launch. Which is fine.

I understand that the word gimmick imples a negative short term scheme, but why does it have to.

Can there be such a thing as a great gimmick? One that sells regardless of how well it is actually implemented on a large scale basis. One that has robbed the great Nintendo franchises from becoming anything more than what they were in the last generation. Boy I would  love to play the best selling SSBB for the wii, but I already played melee years ago. I would love to play SMG, but they put mario on rails!!, sweet.

You said: 

"Lemme tell you something bro. If the PS3 could perform ALCHEMY, it still woulda lost to the Wii, starting at 5 hundred and 99 United States Mint Crisp US dollars."  ( I love that mint crisp sentence by the way!)

I agree with you there. But doesn't that make you sad. Always knowing that video games cannot become more than what they always have been. And thanks largely in part to the successfull wii.... always will be.

I will always want to buy the ferrari in life. But What incentive will Sony have to make the PS4 a ferrari, just as they did for the PS3?   None.   Thank you Wii.


No need to thank the Wii for that one as it is Sony and PS1 & PS 2 you will need to thank if you really think in thoose terms as Nintendo built the so called "Ferrari" with N64 and the gamecube but the inferior PS1 & PS 2 won thoose generations.

 



Vaio - "Bury me at Milanello"      R.I.P AC Milan

In the 60's, people took acid to make the world weird.
Now the world is weird  and people take Prozac  to make it normal.

If laughing is the best medicine and marijuana makes you laugh

Is marijuana the best medicine?

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind."

“If any creator has not played Mario, then they’re probably not a good creator. That’s something I can say with 100 percent confidence. Mario is, for game creators, the development bible.

Around the Network

Just a few comments:

1. Playing with your Wii sounds very childish.

2. Waggle is a term used for the Wii Remote already.

3. I've said many times that a Wii Remote type controller for PS2 would keep it alive for the life of the Wii since the PS2 and Wii get ports from each other already. The controls would then favor the PS2 because the default controller is better than the classic controller and GC controller (or at least better than classic and cheaper than GC, but relatively equal either way). Rather than having to buy a GC controller or Brawl, Kart, etc, you could just get a "waggle" or whatever for the PS2.