By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - First Super Mario Odyssey Review in! (EDGE)

Also worth considering is Edge being a physical publication obviously has a cover. So early code is also a competition from devs for cover space. That's also probably part of the reason they have the leverage. Giving them your code early if you are a big, promising release means you may end up on the cover.



Around the Network
Nuvendil said:
Also worth considering is Edge being a physical publication obviously has a cover. So early code is also a competition from devs for cover space. That's also probably part of the reason they have the leverage. Giving them your code early if you are a big, promising release means you may end up on the cover.

Yet Splatoon 2 got an 8. It was released on July 21st, yet reviewed in their magazine that released August 12th. 

The same issue that reviews Super Mario Odyssey is reviewing Metroid: Samus Returns. Metroid released September 15th and did not get a perfect score.

 

No? Nothing? ok...



KLXVER said:
Nuvendil said:

It is illegal to opperate as a supposedly impartial party reviewing or covering a product when you are in fact compensated in some manner for giving it a positive review or promotion and keeping said compensation undisclosed.  That is against the law in most territories.  Here in the States it is classified as a violation of FTC disclosure guidelines.

Can you give me an example where the law came down on a review site for this?

Not off the top of my head, but 1) I'm not a law professor, I don't have case law memorized or on my shelf and 2) 99.999% of publishers would never in a million years do something so profoundly stupid.  They don't even send much in the way of swag to publications, not even t shirts.  These companies are surrounded by lawyers that would tear them a new one if they ever did something so stupid.  Edge is respected but no single review outlet is worth the risk.  And especially given the frequency of leaks in the industry.  It's much safer and more worth it to spend money on marketing.

The only bribery attempts I've seen from publishers/devs was from indies who seem to buy into the "all these sites are bribed all the time" myth, the result being many sites and YouTubers won't review their game at all.



Chrizum said:
KLXVER said:

Ok, so we should only care about what EDGE have to say then? No other review site or publication is worth reading?

I'm just lurking this thread but I have to say it amazes me how you badly you misread and misinterpret everything other posters are saying. I'd only hope this is intentional as it really doesn't make you look good at all.

Like others have said, EDGE is one the most respected of gaming media and have been around for ages. They are one of the few paper magazines to survive the upswing of the internet and are obviously in a very good position in regards to publishers. When EDGE asks Nintendo to review SMO early so they can publish their review on time instead of weeks after launch, it's perfectly understandable why Nintendo chose to comply. Any other major publisher would have done the same, especially when you're confident you've deliverd a quality product.

It seems to be quoted as respected every time it gives a game anyone cares about a good score. SMO is my most anticipated game, but I still question Nintendo and EDGE. I guess its just how my mind works. I dont blindly accept everything. Even if they are respected.



Was going to keep this going but fuck it. I'm done with this guilty-until-proven-innocent one man witch hunt BS. Once the conspiracy theorist "I'm just not a sheep" retort comes out, I'm done.



Around the Network
Nuvendil said:
Was going to keep this going but fuck it. I'm done with this guilty-until-proven-innocent one man witch hunt BS. Once the conspiracy theorist "I'm just not a sheep" retort comes out, I'm done.

Yeah, opinions have no place in discussions!



KLXVER said:
Nuvendil said:
Was going to keep this going but fuck it. I'm done with this guilty-until-proven-innocent one man witch hunt BS. Once the conspiracy theorist "I'm just not a sheep" retort comes out, I'm done.

Yeah, opinions have no place in discussions!

I don't give a crap what your *opinions* are but you aren't giving an opinion.  You are digging you heels in, declaring your opinions fact, and demanding people dig through THOUSANDS of reviews given out over decades to find proof of innosence over an accusation made that has no evidentiary basis in the first place.

And more importantly, I do care when you casually brush off those disagreeng with you as sheep who blindly accept things while you are some keen intelect.  Forgive me if I find that condescending.



Nuvendil said:
KLXVER said:

Yeah, opinions have no place in discussions!

I don't give a crap what your *opinions* are but you aren't giving an opinion.  You are digging you heels in, declaring your opinions fact, and demanding people dig through THOUSANDS of reviews given out over decades to find proof of innosence over an accusation made that has no evidentiary basis in the first place.

And more importantly, I do care when you casually brush off those disagreeng with you as sheep who blindly accept things while you are some keen intelect.  Forgive me if I find that condescending.

I gave you two examples. I just googled "Splatoon 2 EDGE review" and "Metroid: Samus Returns EDGE review". It was pretty easy...



Dude! Accept the score and wait for other reviewers. If majority gives it a 10 as well...... Then WHAT???????



Pocky Lover Boy! 

Jranation said:
Dude! Accept the score and wait for other reviewers. If majority gives it a 10 as well...... Then WHAT???????

Im sure it will get alot of 10s. Thats not really the issue...