Price is not only those 2 things.  There are multiple conditions to how a price is determined for a market as I mentioned a few already.  On the PS4, Sony gets their take for each game sold for the PSVR including their own games.  On the PC they get none of that so selling in the PC space really gains them nothing unless they are going to really support it.  So far, Sony has shone no signs of support PC at all and its not the platform they consider bringing their games to.

As for the PSVR working on the PC, is this some typeo of hack.  I could see nothing from Sony and saw something on reddit but it appears hit or miss and you cannot use the move controllers and camera support is wonky.

I'll repeat myself, Sony stated that they make profit on the HW so the HW itself is sold at profit. PS4 was initially breaking even with the sale of one game and PSN+, then break even by itself and now making small profit by itself. So you are trying to make the pricetag of PSVR just have profit with SW sold, which is untrue.

You use KB+M, the camera itself works by tracing, it's a hack of course, Sony isn't supporting it. Yet, PSVR works on PC.

Actually I only found one statement from Sony on the PSVR and they did not say they make a profit, they said they are in the black.  This could mean a lot of things but it does not mean they are actually making a profit on the actual price of the hardware.

As for hacks, that is all well and good but it is a hack.  It has no support behind it from the company and no resources put behind the product on the PC.  This is not the same thing.

Dumbed down? The only thing dumbed down is the graphic fidelity. Heck Polybius without VR is the dumbed down version as that game can really use 120fps at the speed its going. But sure, the market isn't large enough to risk long expensive projects on it, thus most if not all VR exclusive games are pretty short. Yet the ones shared with normal screen usage are not dumbed down, rather enhanced by playing in VR.

RE7 without VR is the dumbed down version since you can't peak through cracks in the door or out a window.
Until dawn wouldn't work outside VR, how would you shoot in two different directions which would both be off-screen.
The speed challenges in Eagle flight would be near impossible with a controller.
How would you weave through a hail of bullets in Superhot VR. It's not a dumbed down version, it's a different game.
Dirt Rally is much easier in VR, that's not because its dumbed down, simply because you have a far better sense of speed and situational awareness.

Ofcourse for all a better sense of situational awereness is highly beneficial. I have far less need of a map in VR. I would have gotten hopelessly lost in the solus project on a screen. In VR I'm surprised how easy I can find my way around and back.

Anyway I don't know what you and your friends have been playing. There are plenty of misses too, happens with the experimental nature of a new way to play games. The worst I've played are Loading human: Chapter 1, Super Stardust Ultra, virZoom Arcade and Neptune Flux. Lot of mediocre stuff too but the same is true for normal game releases.

Oooohh... "the majority of people". Is that a big number? How many people are we talking about?

Oh, three people... you and your two friends. That seems to be a very representative group and not anecdotal at all!

http://www.alistdaily.com/digital/study-89-percent-of-vr-buyers-are-satisfied-with-their-purchase/

RE7 is the exception not the rule.

Farpoint for instance without VR would be considered a "bad" shooter as it is WAAAAY dumbed down compared to something like Battlefield/CoD/Titanfall/*insert random FPS here*

(Cut your quote down so it would not be so massive)

I do not care what a biased survey says. Even Google Cardboard scored high that alone shows it is baloney

I have 2 physical friends with VR headsets and 4 or 5 online. Not one of us think it is anything special. Not saying it does not deserve to exist but that it will be a niche. My point with the other guy was in no way has VR had anywhere close to the impact as Pong did and we have absolutely 0 evidence of it ever being anything but a niche at this point. I could care less if you like it or not if you do that is great I hope you enjoy it but I just do not see it becoming a mainstream thing ever. AR has a much better chance imo

It's not VR that makes it a mediocre shooter. Comparing it to extremely high budget shooters isn't "insert random fps"...

Some things work much better in FarPoint.

Aiming through the sights is very natural and easy to do.
It's much easier to quickly aim between multiple targets or shoot one way while checking another direction, some of the boss encounters will be much harder without VR plus AIM as well as the timed challenges.
Hiding behind cover is completely natural, no problem with sticky or auto cover as in traditional shooters.
It's also much easier to shoot from cover, around the side, over the top, through cracks. You can peer through a crack while holding the gun over your head to shoot.

The walking speed is indeed dumbed down, hopefully devs will come over the fear of motion sickness and stop limiting movement for those that are accustomed to VR. Yet what you get extra in complete control over the gun and usage of cover already makes it a much better way to play shooters. AZ Sunshine with the AIM controller is pretty good already.