No tell that to us. We're entertaining it. She had what she had to say about her failed campaign. Let it end there. Humans, sheesh. She's got no power over any of us, we should be worried about Trump and his trash cabinet. You know, the people who can ACTUALLY screw our lives over?

I call bullshit.  Look at the state of Texas and college tuition here.  Good old George W and republicans took off the caps of tuition increase per year in the state of Texas.  You know what happened when the caps were removed?  Cost of tuition increased through the roof.

The college I went to in early 2000s (state not private) was about 3-4k in tuition per year.  It is about 10k in tuition alone per year now. I believe in the early 80s it was a few thousands if that to get a degree. 

https://www.depts.ttu.edu/financialaid/costToAttend.php

So much for letting the free market solve itself.  How's all those monopolies going now?  Why don't we just let companies form monopolies in telecom, cable, pharma, or any other industry.  What's the need of a trust bust?  You are so worried about getting ruled by the government you let all the companies merge into one big shit storm.  Have fucking fun because guess what?  Reality is shit

1. Emails were leaked showing the DNC favored Hillary and were in fact supporting her. They were taken to court over it and they basically said we don't have to be fair. Bernie supports were screwed over a fair primary race. So yes they stayed home and contributed to Hillary losing. That's not butthurt that's refusing to take part in the political game the DNC was playing and that they continue to play. The DNC has been recieving record low donations people are pissed and they refuse to acknowledge it.

2. Polls showed Bernie beating Trump by a wider margin than Hillary. At the end of the day we don't know what would have happened and the DNC contributed in robbing us of really finding out.

3. Any real American would have done the American thing and voted for the candidate they believed in or stayed at home and not vote at all. That's our right as Americans. We're not here to treat the election by saying "Well at least she's not as bad as that guy". If that's how you're voting step your game up and become a real American. Their are third party candidates you don't have to vote for Hillary because they tell you it's a waste. That's how they control the sheep.

1. Emails were leaked showing the DNC favored Hillary and were in fact supporting her. They were taken to court over it and they basically said we don't have to be fair. Bernie supports were screwed over a fair primary race. So yes they stayed home and contributed to Hillary losing. That's not butthurt that's refusing to take part in the political game the DNC was playing and that they continue to play. The DNC has been recieving record low donations people are pissed and they refuse to acknowledge it.

2. Polls showed Bernie beating Trump by a wider margin than Hillary. At the end of the day we don't know what would have happened and the DNC contributed in robbing us of really finding out.

3. Any real American would have done the American thing and voted for the candidate they believed in or stayed at home and not vote at all. That's our right as Americans. We're not here to treat the election by saying "Well at least she's not as bad as that guy". If that's how you're voting step your game up and become a real American. Their are third party candidates you don't have to vote for Hillary because they tell you it's a waste. That's how they control the sheep.

Caps on tuition don't solve the problem. A school can charge whatever the hell it wants, imo. If it costs too much, then people could not afford to go and enrollment would decrease, forcing them to reduce cost.

The reason they CAN raise the costs is because the government made it so that the poorest of the poor can go into huge debt. Like 90% of my friends all were paying for their school completely through loans. They and their families could not afford the school at all. Didn't matter if the school cost 3k a semester or 30k a semester, they would just get loans to cover it. No one got denied loans.

Now if they were more strick on handing out loans, or capping loan amounts, then schools could not charge whatever the hell they wanted. If I could only get a 20k a year loan, I could not afford to go to a 40k a year school. That school would be forced to lower its prices so they could fill enrollment. But since I can get a 40k a year loan, the school can charge that amount. In both scenerios, my situation is the same. I'm not from a richer or poorer family, I dont' have anymore or less colateral, my cosigner is the same, ect. They just let me take out a bigger loan for no reason other than I said the school I am going to costs more. The schools KNOW that students can take out rediculous loans and thus they know they can raise tuition.

Your thinking is backwards. Don't cap the schools limit on charging tuition, the market will self regulate that. There are only so many rich people that could afford super high tuition. Cap the limit on loans though. WIth unlimited loans, essentially everyone becomes super rich, thus the schools charge/raise tuition as if everyone is super rich. They don't care that everyone graduates with 50k+ in loans, because they are guaranteed that money. Did you know you can declare bankrupcy on everything in life except school loans. So not only the schools, but the loaners are guaranteed to always get their money, thus why they hand it out like candy to anyone who asks.

@ #1: So what if they favored her? Big whoop. They favored her in 2008 and she lost to Obama. When Obama pulled ahead, the superdelegates and the DNC put their support behind him. You do know that political parties are private institutions and their leadership and members can favor whoever the hell they want to, right? And FWIW, Sanders was and still is an independent, not a Democrat.

This is why Obama beat Hillary while Sanders lost against her:

Sanders just didn't have the support Obama did in 2008, and, except for a very narrow window in late March/early April, Sanders was always behind Hillary in the polls. Sanders lost fair and square.

@ #2: So what? Clearly most primary voters didn't care about general election polling at the time.

@ #3: And that attitude right there is part of the reason why we have Donald Trump sitting in the White House. You saw a Giant Douche and Turd Sandwich running for President. I saw an establishment Democrat and a dangerous, megalomaniacal man-child who coddles racists, thinks government exists to make life easier for the rich and harder for everyone who isn't rich, and who threatens to undo every progressive reform back to the New Deal and perhaps beyond. Anybody who didn't see a very real difference between Clinton and Trump, anyone who thought they were equally as bad or close to it, is blind.

Feh. That guy has no idea what he's talking about. When was the last time an honest-to-God left-wing Democrat in the vein of Bernie Sanders won a general election? Since the end of WW2, we've seen the following Democrats win the presidency: Truman, JFK, LBJ, Carter, Bill Clinton, and Obama. Of those seven men, how many of them were reasonably close to Sanders? Not a damn one.

Y'know, I really like Sanders. I've "Felt the Bern" long before it was popular. Many of his supporters were still in diapers when I first started supporting his ideals. I voted for him in the primary, and I would have voted for him time and time again if I lived in Vermont. But again, I knew that Trump was simply too dangerous to simply go "Well, Hillary sucks so I'm staying home/voting third-party." I may like Sanders, but I'm not an ideological purist, and I'm not suicidal. But some Bernie Bros helped put the round in the chamber because Hillary was "2centrist4me," and time will tell if Trump will pull the trigger and blow this country's metaphorical brains out or merely just shoot it in the foot.

@ #1: So what if they favored her? Big whoop. They favored her in 2008 and she lost to Obama. When Obama pulled ahead, the superdelegates and the DNC put their support behind him. You do know that political parties are private institutions and their leadership and members can favor whoever the hell they want to, right? And FWIW, Sanders was and still is an independent, not a Democrat.

This is why Obama beat Hillary while Sanders lost against her:

Sanders just didn't have the support Obama did in 2008, and, except for a very narrow window in late March/early April, Sanders was always behind Hillary in the polls. Sanders lost fair and square.

@ #2: So what? Clearly most primary voters didn't care about general election polling at the time.

@ #3: And that attitude right there is part of the reason why we have Donald Trump sitting in the White House. You saw a Giant Douche and Turd Sandwich running for President. I saw an establishment Democrat and a dangerous, megalomaniacal man-child who coddles racists, thinks government exists to make life easier for the rich and harder for everyone who isn't rich, and who threatens to undo every progressive reform back to the New Deal and perhaps beyond. Anybody who didn't see a very real difference between Clinton and Trump, anyone who thought they were equally as bad or close to it, is blind.

Feh. That guy has no idea what he's talking about. When was the last time an honest-to-God left-wing Democrat in the vein of Bernie Sanders won a general election? Since the end of WW2, we've seen the following Democrats win the presidency: Truman, JFK, LBJ, Carter, Bill Clinton, and Obama. Of those seven men, how many of them were reasonably close to Sanders? Not a damn one.

Y'know, I really like Sanders. I've "Felt the Bern" long before it was popular. Many of his supporters were still in diapers when I first started supporting his ideals. I voted for him in the primary, and I would have voted for him time and time again if I lived in Vermont. But again, I knew that Trump was simply too dangerous to simply go "Well, Hillary sucks so I'm staying home/voting third-party." I may like Sanders, but I'm not an ideological purist, and I'm not suicidal. But some Bernie Bros helped put the round in the chamber because Hillary was "2centrist4me," and time will tell if Trump will pull the trigger and blow this country's metaphorical brains out or merely just shoot it in the foot.

Caps on tuition don't solve the problem. A school can charge whatever the hell it wants, imo. If it costs too much, then people could not afford to go and enrollment would decrease, forcing them to reduce cost.

The reason they CAN raise the costs is because the government made it so that the poorest of the poor can go into huge debt. Like 90% of my friends all were paying for their school completely through loans. They and their families could not afford the school at all. Didn't matter if the school cost 3k a semester or 30k a semester, they would just get loans to cover it. No one got denied loans.

Now if they were more strick on handing out loans, or capping loan amounts, then schools could not charge whatever the hell they wanted. If I could only get a 20k a year loan, I could not afford to go to a 40k a year school. That school would be forced to lower its prices so they could fill enrollment. But since I can get a 40k a year loan, the school can charge that amount. In both scenerios, my situation is the same. I'm not from a richer or poorer family, I dont' have anymore or less colateral, my cosigner is the same, ect. They just let me take out a bigger loan for no reason other than I said the school I am going to costs more. The schools KNOW that students can take out rediculous loans and thus they know they can raise tuition.

Your thinking is backwards. Don't cap the schools limit on charging tuition, the market will self regulate that. There are only so many rich people that could afford super high tuition. Cap the limit on loans though. WIth unlimited loans, essentially everyone becomes super rich, thus the schools charge/raise tuition as if everyone is super rich. They don't care that everyone graduates with 50k+ in loans, because they are guaranteed that money. Did you know you can declare bankrupcy on everything in life except school loans. So not only the schools, but the loaners are guaranteed to always get their money, thus why they hand it out like candy to anyone who asks.