Unless they fuck up really hard it should be. Depending how tolerant you are on frame drops below 60.

Good points. The problem with these kinds of threads is that it equates PC and console versions. It's conveniently ignored that PC uses higher quality assets and more complex rendering such as lighting. PC also uses actual 4k and actual 60fps.

All in all this means that PC versions are several times more demanding. If you consider that you have to stitch 3 PS4 Pros together to reach the performance of a 1080ti it puts the $800 price into perspective.

Hmm i dont have a Ti however i do run a 1080 paired with an i7700k. Ill try to run it at 4k however i dont expect 60. 30 frames will be alright.

I'm ready to take this over to the mod thread. Which I already did.

Yeah that's my biggest issue with 4K gaming. I fear the idea that next gen games will be 4K we litterally could have 500 GB 4K games, fun downloading them :s.

Maybe not 500GB but 200GB could become a norm. But internet is getting faster too and there will always be options to preload. The bigger problem I'm seeing is cheap console manufacturers omitting SSDs in their next consoles. As if load times aren't horrible enough right now.

Yeah, it's always frustrating when you go all in on top tier hardware and the game still recommends lower than maximum settings lol... once you look under the advanced tab, though, it almost always becomes very obvious why you can't usually slide every slider all the way to the right. 

Otherwise, I think the confusion about 4k is due (first and obviously) to most console gamers not also having a decked out PC, but also the clever marketing of Sony and Microsoft have people thinking that 4k is attainable in the $400-500 range, when in reality it's an exceptionally compromised (if still great-looking) 4k experience. Really, with these console versions I'd generally prefer rame rates and whatever additional assets/rendering they can include over the semi-4k resolution... I prefer consoles for some genres and like playing with my friends on them as well, so I hope they make the option available to choose between a better running 1080p and the "sort of" 4k option in most games.

lol I think 500gb games are still a ways off, but I very much expect to have my first ~150-200gb game in the few years... I suppose it depends on whether DLC, patches, and/or mods are included.

I know some games, like Halo 5, have already topped 100gb with patches included. Thankfully, even SSD of 1TB or larger are becoming more affordable, so hopefully we can keep up and avoid having to reinstall too often lol

Except the trailer I linked shows it at 4k 60fps and the game settings screenshot even sports a 60fps option...

DOn't use the options?.

I stopped using TXAA in GTA V because they claimed it would do away with the jags, but not cost as much as MSAA, yet you still need to have 2X MSAA enabled to make it work. HBAO+ asks for that bit more power in games like FF XIV, but it's not a massive difference to tank performance, visually it's not that much different either.

We'll soon see how AMD cards manage the game with gameworks turned on vs off.