Pacifists believe that violence is unjustifiable. Example, Ghandi.
He said “If someone slaps you on one side of your face, turn the other one to him."

Not "hit them back because it's justified."

He condemned all the groups for inciting violence...

Now yes, if the person who drove the car was a white supremacist, then Trump should go after those people specifically and call it out as terrorism. But lets have more information come in.

Eh, you cannot put BLM and the KKK in the same category. 

Eh, you cannot put BLM and the KKK in the same category. 

He won't outright condemn white supremasists and you know why he won't. Lets be honest here. "Both sides/all sides" is often a convienant excuse to wash one's hands of having to take a definitive stance. 

You just don't get it because you, like many of your stance, can't step back far enough to evaluate the reality of it all.

Protesting doesn't change the opinions of apposing sides, it solidifies it and emboldens it.

Protesting against a hate group doesn't make that hate group go away, it just enforces their already stupid ideas and opinions, and gives them a sense of validity to what they believe - in the white supremacists case, the opposition just makes them fight back harder, and increase the ferrocity of their actions.

This is almost always the case, because protesting does not encourage logical debate, protesting generally functions explicity to push an opinion or agenda on others and reject the opinion and agenda of others, it's a war of attrition, nobody ever wins, and without logical debate, opinions are never altered, they're just doubled down on and the rift between groups increases.

It isn't about who is right and who is wrong, because people never get to a point where they can explain why, it ultimately boils down to a shouting match, and the people who turned up in defense of either side, go home holding the same opinions they held the day before, only now they are a even less likely to question themselves.

You just don't get it because you, like many of your stance, can't step back far enough to evaluate the reality of it all.

Protesting doesn't change the opinions of apposing sides, it solidifies it and emboldens it.

Protesting against a hate group doesn't make that hate group go away, it just enforces their already stupid ideas and opinions, and gives them a sense of validity to what they believe - in the white supremacists case, the opposition just makes them fight back harder, and increase the ferrocity of their actions.

This is almost always the case, because protesting does not encourage logical debate, protesting generally functions explicity to push an opinion or agenda on others and reject the opinion and agenda of others, it's a war of attrition, nobody ever wins, and without logical debate, opinions are never altered, they're just doubled down on and the rift between groups increases.

It isn't about who is right and who is wrong, because people never get to a point where they can explain why, it ultimately boils down to a shouting match, and the people who turned up in defense of either side, go home holding the same opinions they held the day before, only now they are a even less likely to question themselves.