NATO said:
You just don't get it because you, like many of your stance, can't step back far enough to evaluate the reality of it all. Protesting doesn't change the opinions of apposing sides, it solidifies it and emboldens it. Protesting against a hate group doesn't make that hate group go away, it just enforces their already stupid ideas and opinions, and gives them a sense of validity to what they believe - in the white supremacists case, the opposition just makes them fight back harder, and increase the ferrocity of their actions. In instances where the perceived prevelance of a hate groups numbers are reduced, in actual fact all that has happened is the groups numbers have gone to ground, and hate groups hidden from plain sight are a much more dangerous group to deal with than the ones that you can point out in broad daylight. This is almost always the case, because protesting does not encourage logical debate, protesting generally functions explicity to push an opinion or agenda on others and reject the opinion and agenda of others, it's a war of attrition, nobody ever wins, and without logical debate, opinions are never altered, they're just doubled down on and the rift between groups increases. It isn't about who is right and who is wrong, because people never get to a point where they can explain why, it ultimately boils down to a shouting match, and the people who turned up in defense of either side, go home holding the same opinions they held the day before, only now they are a even less likely to question themselves. |
exactly... dialogue is the only solution to these issues and even that might not work, but it is the only solution
calling people "evil" and ostracising them instead of engaging them on their beliefs is not only lazy but it strenghens their resolve and somehow people don't get that even though its so obvious








