How much of a voting bloc? I really don't think there are enough white supremicists to change an election result. Yes, these people are pieces of shit, and if it is confirmed that a white supremicist drove that car into those people, it should be considered a terrorist attack by the president.

That still doesn't mean that they, as a group, promote violence. The KKK lived and breathed it, which is a shame, because the origins of the Klan were not built around that. However, that's what it became. BLM does not have a legacy like that, and as noted, its current leaders do not advocate for violence. So the two groups are vastly different in their meaning and message.

I am saying that modern media seem more than happy these days to lump the blame on "white people" as a generalized group, and whether or not doing so is justified makes little difference, the end result is the same, most people would just roll their eyes and move on, but radicalized people such as white supremacists do not, thus the media perpetuates the rift between races.

Are you saying the only possible alternative to protesting is to "do nothing" ?

That is flat out wrong, the only real way to dismantle sexism and racism and discrimination based on gender, sexuality, race or religious belief, is through education and debate.

Sitting at home and doing nothing is neither education nor debate.

Racists aren't going to stop being racist by people shouting "Racist!" at them, just as men who objectify women aren't going to suddenly decide "I think i'll start respecting women now" if a womens group with their tits out march past them with slogans painted on their bodies.

A large portion of humanity are a lost cause when it comes to the ism's we mostly attribute to being a detriment to society, and rather than focus time and energy in shouting at them for existing, that energy, time, and money would be better spent educating new generations not to follow suit.

Are you saying the only possible alternative to protesting is to "do nothing" ?

That is flat out wrong, the only real way to dismantle sexism and racism and discrimination based on gender, sexuality, race or religious belief, is through education and debate.

Sitting at home and doing nothing is neither education nor debate.

Racists aren't going to stop being racist by people shouting "Racist!" at them, just as men who objectify women aren't going to suddenly decide "I think i'll start respecting women now" if a womens group with their tits out march past them with slogans painted on their bodies.

A large portion of humanity are a lost cause when it comes to the ism's we mostly attribute to being a detriment to society, and rather than focus time and energy in shouting at them for existing, that energy, time, and money would be better spent educating new generations not to follow suit.

There are enough people who quietly share these views to give him a healthy voter bloc, and lets not forget he lost the popular vote and barely eeked out victories in swing states, so every voter bloc matters. They are a shrinking portion of the voter base, but they're still there for now. 

He will only acknowledge this as a terrorist attack if he is pressured into doing so, right now he would like to have this situation probably go away. Diet (wink wink/hush hush) racism works well for him, but when racism is shown it's full force, people realize how ugly it is and no one wants to be associated with *that* kind of racism. 

Playing the "all sides" card lets him tip toe the line while winking at white supremasists "see? I'm your guy, I didn't directly condemn you guys, it's all sides". The language is deliberate. Now there may come a point where he is eventually shamed into saying what he should say now as a leader, but likely he's hoping right now that this just blows over so he doesn't have to. 

There are enough people who quietly share these views to give him a healthy voter bloc, and lets not forget he lost the popular vote and barely eeked out victories in swing states, so every voter bloc matters. 

He will only acknowledge this as a terrorist attack if he is pressured into doing so, right now he would like to have this situation probably go away. Diet (wink wink/hush hush) racism works well for him, but when racism is shown it's full force, people realize how ugly it is and no one wants to be associated with *that* kind of racism. 

Playing the "all sides" card lets him tip toe the line while winking at white supremasists "see? I'm your guy, I didn't directly condemn you guys, it's all sides". The language is deliberate. Now there may come a point where he is eventually shamed into saying what he should say now as a leader, but likely he's hoping right now that this just blows over so he doesn't have to. 

77,000 voters in three states. In that case, there are probably millions of these people around America. The KKK barely has 1000s of people in its group, so there no, these people didn't win him the election. 

I'm aware that he has done that as well.
After all, he is the guy who was on every side of practically every issue. He plays both sides. And that's why he at times avoids denouncing these things, at least for a while, and then he goes out and does it to appease to the rest of the voters, and because he knows that his alt right/nazi supporters know that he is basically forced to do so as it is expected of him. But those days when he doesn't denounce it, and when he suggests they may be good people, they take note of that.